See also: IRC log
<trackbot> Date: 23 August 2011
<scribe> Scribe: Mark
<scribe> Scribe: Mark
No modifications to agenda
http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/tracker/actions/245 - this is moot now that we have two implementations of the WSDL portions of the spec
<trackbot> ACTION-245 Check with Yves if we could allow only one implementation of the optional WSDL part closed
http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/tracker/actions/247 - Matthew - no status
http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/tracker/actions/249 - Mark Phillips - no progress
Eric: Sent an initial note on this to the mail list today
Eric: Will leave ACTION-250 open for now
Eric: We need to decide as a group that we will go ahead with this
Proposal is that we use the current editors draft in CVS (linked above) as our proposed recommendation
RESOLUTION: We will put forward the current editor's draft for public review with the aim of moving to PR
action mark to run the proposed PR draft through the pubrules checker
<trackbot> Created ACTION-252 - Run the proposed PR draft through the pubrules checker [on Mark Phillips - due 2011-08-30].
action on derek to Come up with a proposal for the status of the document (SOTD) text (in collaboration with Yves )
<trackbot> Sorry, couldn't find user - on
action derek to Come up with a proposal for the status of the document (SOTD) text (in collaboration with Yves )
<trackbot> Created ACTION-253 - Come up with a proposal for the status of the document (SOTD) text (in collaboration with Yves ) [on Derek Rokicki - due 2011-08-30].
action Eric to Figure out why the 2011 PR link says "public review" instead of "proposed recommendation"
<trackbot> Created ACTION-254 - Figure out why the 2011 PR link says "public review" instead of "proposed recommendation" [on Eric Johnson - due 2011-08-30].
Eric: Yves recommended that we demonstrate interoperability by showing one product working with another
Derek: Have been working for a
while to organise interops testing between Software AG and
... But no progress to date
Phil: Similar status with WebSphere - desirable to test WAS 8 with CXF, but no resources available
action Mark To investigate level of testing between WAS and WebSphere Message Broker
<trackbot> Created ACTION-255 - Investigate level of testing between WAS and WebSphere Message Broker [on Mark Phillips - due 2011-08-30].
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.136 of Date: 2011/05/12 12:01:43 Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00) No ScribeNick specified. Guessing ScribeNick: mphillip Found Scribe: Mark Found Scribe: Mark Default Present: Derek, [IBMUK], eric, alewis, padams Present: Derek [IBMUK] eric alewis padams Found Date: 23 Aug 2011 Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2011/08/23-soap-jms-minutes.html People with action items: WARNING: Input appears to use implicit continuation lines. You may need the "-implicitContinuations" option.[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]