W3C

- DRAFT -

WebFonts Working Group Teleconference

29 Jun 2011

See also: IRC log

Attendees

Present
Regrets
Chair
SV_MEETING_CHAIR
Scribe
John

Contents


<trackbot> Date: 29 June 2011

<Vlad> As part of the call I'd like to discuss and finalize this: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webfonts-wg/2011Jun/0093.html

<jdaggett> Vlad: i'm here, just trying to connect via skype...

Vlad opens with discussion of Samsung objection

JD: seems nothing new from Glenn

Vlad: difficult to get solid informaton re. concern

JD: Is Vlad aware of video spec referencing early W3C drafts?

Vlad: Not with reference to css-fonts.

V: Glenn now saying he is interested in future compatibility.

JD: All seem proxy arguments for making same origin restriction optional.

Vlad; Specs intended to enable interoperability.

Profile specs may differ, but this is not concern of W3C

Tal: Have there been other css-font changes that have been backwards incompatible?

JD: difficult to say due to problems of CSS2... not really implementable and hence removed for CSS3

V: Comfortable keeping fomal objection on record and making the case to W3C

JD: Is timing of objection re. css-fonts appropriate (not last call yet)

V: for WOFF spec timing is appropriate

<sgalineau> from his last message I do not think Glenn even understands that the requirement only applies to requests from the src descriptor

JD: Concern that Hakon wants same origin moved from css-fonts to other spec

JD But confident that can handleformal objection from Samsung

JD: Will bring up issue at CSS WG call re. locaton of same origin; move to vote.

Vlad will send draft liason message to CSS after this call.

<Vlad> As part of the call I'd like to discuss and finalize this: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webfonts-wg/2011Jun/0093.html

Liason asks CSS WG to support css-fonts draft to spec same origin

V: Open action items....

<Vlad> action 93 - close

<trackbot> Sorry, couldn't find user - 93

<jdaggett> sorry, i have to run now...

<Vlad> action 93?

<trackbot> Sorry, bad ACTION syntax

<Vlad> action 93, status?

<trackbot> Sorry, couldn't find user - 93,

<Vlad> action Vlad, status?

<trackbot> Sorry, couldn't find user - Vlad,

V: closing action item to draft liason w/ CSS WG

(93)

Tal: waiting for last call to end before closing test action

V: three more action items with Chris Lilley. WIll wait to hear from him re. these.

Other items?

Chris: Anyone else going to TypeCon?

John: yes

Call ended.

Summary of Action Items

[End of minutes]

Minutes formatted by David Booth's scribe.perl version 1.136 (CVS log)
$Date: 2011/06/29 14:36:16 $

Scribe.perl diagnostic output

[Delete this section before finalizing the minutes.]
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.136  of Date: 2011/05/12 12:01:43  
Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/

Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00)

No ScribeNick specified.  Guessing ScribeNick: John
Inferring Scribes: John

WARNING: No "Topic:" lines found.


WARNING: No "Present: ... " found!
Possibly Present: Chris JD John P37 Tal Vlad aaaa aabb aacc cslye erik jdaggett joined sergeym sgalineau sylvaing trackbot webfonts
You can indicate people for the Present list like this:
        <dbooth> Present: dbooth jonathan mary
        <dbooth> Present+ amy


WARNING: No meeting chair found!
You should specify the meeting chair like this:
<dbooth> Chair: dbooth

Found Date: 29 Jun 2011
Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2011/06/29-webfonts-minutes.html
People with action items: 

WARNING: Input appears to use implicit continuation lines.
You may need the "-implicitContinuations" option.


WARNING: No "Topic: ..." lines found!  
Resulting HTML may have an empty (invalid) <ol>...</ol>.

Explanation: "Topic: ..." lines are used to indicate the start of 
new discussion topics or agenda items, such as:
<dbooth> Topic: Review of Amy's report


[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]