See also: IRC log
JT has notes from last week...
Resolution all accept: PROPOSAL: A.3.2.4 Auto-Save (Extended): The authoring tool can be set to automatically save web content edits made using the authoring tool. (Level AAA)
Resolution: All accept PROPOSAL:
A.3.2.4 Auto-Save (Extended): The authoring tool can be set to
automatically save web content edits made using the authoring
tool. (Level AAA)
... All agree to PROPOSAL to shorten the way we indicate SC Level depends on WCAG 2.0
Regtrets: Jeanne S.
accessible templates (WCAG):
Templates that can be filled in to create web content that meets the WCAG 2.0 success criteria (Level A, AA or AAA), when both of the following are true:
(a) The author correctly follows any instructions provided (e.g., correctly responding to prompts, correctly replacing highlighted placeholders); and
(b) No further authoring occurs.
Note: Under these conditions, some templates will result in completely empty documents, which are considered accessible by default.
Resolution: all accept: PROPOSAL: update definition of accessible templates (WCAG) http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35520/20110616/results#xq18
PROPOSAL: B.2.4.1 Accessible Template Options (WCAG):
JR: Note: The accessible options may be identified.
JT: Note: It is recommended that the accessible options be identified, but this is not required.
Resolution: All accept PROPOSAL: update definition of accessible templates (WCAG) http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35520/20110616/results#xq18 with "Note: It is recommended that the accessible options be identified, but this is not required."
Resolution: All accept PROPOSAL: B.2.4.2 Identify Template Accessibility (Minimum)
Resolution: All accept PROPOSAL: B.2.4.x Identify Template Accessibility (Enhanced) http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35520/20110616/results#xq21
The status requirement is simply that the author receive information about the state of things from the accessibility checker. The note clarifies that the format of the report is not specified: "B.3.1.4 Status Report: Authors can receive an accessibility status report based on the results of the accessibility checks. (Level AA) Note: The format of the accessibility status is not specified....
scribe: For example, the status might be a listing of problems detected or a WCAG 2.0 conformance level, etc. "
Resolution: All accept proposed response : B.3.1.4 Status Report http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35520/20110616/results#xq22
Resolution: All accept B.3.1.5 Programmatic association of results (http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35520/20110616/results#xq23)
Resolution: All accept proposal on B.4.2.1 Model Practice (WCAG) in ATAG 2.0 http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35520/20110616/results#xq24
Cherie...15th of Sept better, Greg as well.
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.136 of Date: 2011/05/12 12:01:43 Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00) No ScribeNick specified. Guessing ScribeNick: Jan Inferring Scribes: Jan Default Present: Cherie, Jan, Jutta, Alex, Greg, Sueann, Tim_Boland Present: Cherie Jan Jutta Alex Greg Sueann Tim_Boland Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-au/2011AprJun/0093.html Got date from IRC log name: 27 Jun 2011 Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2011/06/27-au-minutes.html People with action items:[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]