See also: IRC log
trackbot, start meeting
<trackbot> Meeting: Authoring Tool Accessibility Guidelines Working Group Teleconference
<trackbot> Date: 06 June 2011
<Jan> Scribe: jeanne
<scribe> scribe: jeanne
JR: We have only received comments from 1 person, we could postpone 2 weeks and send a reminder.
Alex: We are still reviewing.
Greg: How about 2nd week in July?
Jeanne: I was hoping to just do 2 weeks.
Greg: We have to address Andrew's comments which missed the deadline last time.
Jan: What if we re0submitted Andrew's comments
Greg: that would be ok.
... July 1 would be a natural stop, the end of a quarter
Jeanne: I really want to keep pushing to move forward - if we wait too long, it won't be urgent.
Jan: It has already been May 24
deadline, so 2 weeks is a month delay.
... maybe we should let it go. We are still making changes
based on the Microsoft comments. Incorporate the comments we
have received in the current discussion
<Jan> Resolution: Not to re-open comment period on the April 26 public WD.
Greg: schedule?
Jan: Finish the comments, publish another draft in 4 weeks and then if there are no comments, we can go to Last Call.
Alex: I don't think this group can afford to cycle another Last Call.
<Jan> http://www.w3.org/WAI/AU/tracker/actions/open
<Jan> http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35520/20110503/results#xq30
Jan: Jutta wants this to be AA
Alex: Metadata is a vague term, when you only need an association.
Jan: I'm open to other terms.
<Jan> ACTION: JR to reword using programmatically associated or similar term (AL may suggest term) [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2011/06/06-au-minutes.html#action01]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-340 - Reword using programmatically associated or similar term (AL may suggest term) [on Jan Richards - due 2011-06-13].
<Jan> Resolution: Accept the response to GL28
<Jan> Resolution: Accept the response to GL29
<Jan> Skip over this due to action item on MS49
Alex: Dynamic user content is the new issue.
Jan: The checker can only give status on what the checker can check. Even if the content is dynamic, the report can still be generated.
Alex: Then it has to be in a slice of time that has to be acknowledged and the association may not be able to be made
<Jan> ACTION: JR to acknowledge that dynamic content does provide a challenge to determining a "status" [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2011/06/06-au-minutes.html#action02]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-341 - Acknowledge that dynamic content does provide a challenge to determining a "status" [on Jan Richards - due 2011-06-13].
<Jan> Skip over this due to action item on MS49
Jan: What I mean is that the program would save the association of alt text with the image
<Jan> ACTION: AL to look into implementations of alt-text association saving (B.2.3.4 Save for Reuse) [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2011/06/06-au-minutes.html#action03]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-342 - Look into implementations of alt-text association saving (B.2.3.4 Save for Reuse) [on Alex Li - due 2011-06-13].
Jeanne: Every clipboard gallery that I have worked with saves the title of the image - if for no other reason than for searching.
<Jan> Wait for AL's action.
<Jan> Wait for AL's action.
<Jan> GG7
Cherie: you can ignore my commment then.
<Jan> Resolution: All accept response to GG7.
JAn: I believe we changed the definition of prominence on the list.
<Jan> ACTION: JR to look up what was decided about prominence and apply it to UAWG6 [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2011/06/06-au-minutes.html#action04]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-343 - Look up what was decided about prominence and apply it to UAWG6 [on Jan Richards - due 2011-06-13].
Jan will reword with a standard conditional
<Jan> ACTION: JR to reword with conditional on potential for accessibility problems. [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2011/06/06-au-minutes.html#action05]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-344 - Reword with conditional on potential for accessibility problems. [on Jan Richards - due 2011-06-13].
<Jan> Wait for AL's action.
<Jan> Wait for JR's action on prominence.
<Jan> B.2.5 - MS54
Jan: some templates won't let you post until you have entered some minimal information. That's what I meant by minimal instructions.
Alex: It makes sense to me here, but I won't know what a minimal instruction when there is a blank template.
Jan: As soon as it reaches the
point of publishing, that is when we have to test it.
... in the case of blank templates, there would be no
instructions
<Jan> ACTION: JR clarify for accessible templates that there may be no instructions for blank document type templates. [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2011/06/06-au-minutes.html#action06]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-345 - Clarify for accessible templates that there may be no instructions for blank document type templates. [on Jan Richards - due 2011-06-13].
<Jan> ACTION: JR to propose conditional on inaccessible potential [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2011/06/06-au-minutes.html#action07]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-346 - Propose conditional on inaccessible potential [on Jan Richards - due 2011-06-13].
<Jan> Wait for other answers.
<Jan> Didn't finish GL41...
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.136 of Date: 2011/05/12 12:01:43 Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00) Found Scribe: jeanne Inferring ScribeNick: jeanne Found Scribe: jeanne Inferring ScribeNick: jeanne Present: Greg Tim Jan Jeanne Alex Cherie Regrets: Sarah P. Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-au/2011AprJun/0051.html Found Date: 06 Jun 2011 Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2011/06/06-au-minutes.html People with action items: al jr[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]