See also: IRC log
<trackbot> Date: 24 March 2011
yes, give me a minute
<scribe> scribenick: benjamin
<manu1> http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/track/products/8
<manu1> PROPOSAL: Close the following issues, official response was sent, multiple reminders to respond were sent to each comment submitter: ISSUE-46, ISSUE-66, ISSUE-67, ISSUE-69, ISSUE-70, ISSUE-72, ISSUE-73, ISSUE-74, ISSUE-76, ISSUE-78, ISSUE-79, ISSUE-80, ISSUE-81, ISSUE-82, ISSUE-84.
<manu1> +1
+1
<ivan> +1
<webr3> +1
<manu1> RESOLVED: Close the following issues, official response was sent, multiple reminders to respond were sent to each comment submitter: ISSUE-46, ISSUE-66, ISSUE-67, ISSUE-69, ISSUE-70, ISSUE-72, ISSUE-73, ISSUE-74, ISSUE-76, ISSUE-78, ISSUE-79, ISSUE-80, ISSUE-81, ISSUE-82, ISSUE-84.
manu: next issue is described on mailing list
<manu1> Subtopic: XML+RDFa spec bug
<manu1> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdfa-wg/2011Mar/0100.html
<manu1> http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/sources/rdfa-core/#evaluation-context
<manu1> Step 13: the parent subject is set to the value of new subject, if non-null, or the value of the parent subject of the current evaluation context;
<webr3> step 6: "otherwise, if parent object is present, new subject is set to the value of parent object. Additionally, if @property is not present then the skip element flag is set to 'true';"
<manu1> Ivan: The tests are correct and the spec is consistent.
<manu1> Ivan: Separate concern - do we want to set the new subject to the document for XML+RDFa?
<manu1> Ivan: Concerned about adding this at such a late stage.
<markbirbeck> @manu1 Sorry but had a meeting forced on me. Can keep looking at IRC though, if I can help, or you need a vote or something. :)
<markbirbeck> Ok. Can see screen from where I'm sitting. :)
<manu1> PROPOSAL: XML+RDFa does not assume an about="" on the root element. If authors want to generate a triple, they must explicitly set the subject.
<webr3> +1
<ivan> +1
<manu1> +1
+1
<manu1> RESOLVED: XML+RDFa does not assume an about="" on the root element. If authors want to generate a triple, they must explicitly set the subject.
<manu1> Ivan: Do we want to resolve the issues that Mischa raised?
manu: URI references are string sequences of characters
<webr3> URI-ref = ../
the issue of mischa is: http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/track/issues/87
<webr3> "URI"
<webr3> IRI or URI (no reference)
manu: We should wait for Shane to be on the call for resolving this, if it is an editorial change.
<manu1> Ivan: This is editorial in my view
<manu1> Manu: I agree
ivan: The change is editorial, we should leave it to Shane in my view
<webr3> I agree too, editorial
benjamin: as far as i understood it, it seems to be editorial
manu: Any other open issues before the second last call?
the group is not aware of any open issues
<manu1> These are the documents we're asserting should go to 2nd Last Call:
<manu1> http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/sources/rdfa-core/
<manu1> http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/sources/xhtml-rdfa/
manu: Publication date will be march, 29
<manu1> PROPOSAL: RDFa Core 1.1 and XHTML+RDFa 1.1 should proceed into the 2nd Last Call with a publication date targeted at March 29th with a Last Call period of 3 weeks from the publication date.
<ivan> +1
<webr3> +1
+1
<manu1> +1
<manu1> markbirbeck, ping
<markbirbeck> Sorry...
<markbirbeck> +1
<manu1> Knud: +1 (http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdfa-wg/2011Mar/0099.html)
<manu1> RESOLVED: RDFa Core 1.1 and XHTML+RDFa 1.1 should proceed into the 2nd Last Call with a publication date targeted at March 29th with a Last Call period of 3 weeks from the publication date.
manu: do we have to publish on the W3C blog?
ivan yes
<manu1> http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/sources/rdfa-api/
<webr3> document.getItemsByType(type)
ivan: how do i know what types are availlable in the document
<ivan> document.getSubjects()
ivan: you need a method like that
<webr3> why does HTML not have that? document.getElementByID(id) how do I know the id's ?
<webr3> how do you know which rel's, classes etc?
ivan: For example I want to highlight the RDF triples in the document. But where do I start?
<webr3> use the RDF API??
<webr3> document.data.getItemsByWhatever( s , p , o )
<webr3> (leave all null to get all objects) :)
<webr3> it's just merging the functions .getItemBySubject(type) and .getItemsByProperty(property, optional value) together though? still cuts in two
<webr3> not the getElements... RDF API doesn't handle them, only RDFa api does
<manu1> http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/sources/rdfa-api/#document-data
<manu1> var obj = document.data.parse("http://example.com");
<manu1> document.data.rdfa.parse("http://example.com");
<manu1> var doc = CreateDocument(XMLHttpRequest("http://example.com"));
<manu1> doc.data.query(...);
<webr3> the keep can of worms closed approach :)
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.135 of Date: 2009/03/02 03:52:20 Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00) Succeeded: s/were/where/ Succeeded: s/bupliosh/publish/ Found ScribeNick: benjamin Inferring Scribes: benjamin WARNING: No "Present: ... " found! Possibly Present: IPcaller Ivan Knud Manu P22 P24 PROPOSAL Subtopic benjamin joined manu1 markbirbeck rdfa scribenick trackbot webr3 You can indicate people for the Present list like this: <dbooth> Present: dbooth jonathan mary <dbooth> Present+ amy Regrets: Steven ShaneM Knud Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdfa-wg/2011Mar/0089.html Found Date: 24 Mar 2011 Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2011/03/24-rdfa-minutes.html People with action items: WARNING: Input appears to use implicit continuation lines. You may need the "-implicitContinuations" option.[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]