See also: IRC log
<trackbot> Date: 22 March 2011
<scribe> scribenick: Ashok
No changes to agenda
<dug> http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/ra/11/03/2011-03-01.html
http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/ra/11/03/2011-03-01.html
RESOLUTION: Minutes approved w/o objection
Ram: Proposal looks good!
RESOLUTION: Issue 12112 resolved as proposed in bugzilla
No objections to proposal
RESOLUTION: Issue 11776 resolved as proposed in bugzilla
<dug> proposal: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/attachment.cgi?id=963
Dug has proposal in bugzilla -- comment 3
No objections to proposal
RESOLUTION: Issue
120093 resolved as proposed in bugzilla
... comment 3 by Doug Davis
Bob: We are at zero issues
... Talks about CR
<dug> ouch
Bob: I am unavailable for the
next 2 weeks
... can have a call next week if people wish
<dug> LOL
Bob: We need docs with the final
changes so folks can look at them
... minimum CR period is 3 weeks
... sound right to people?
Yves: Depends on how long it takes to gather results
Bob: Discusses testing required
<dug> http://www.soaphub.org/interop/status/WSRA
That's the status page for tests
<dug> +q
<dug> +q
Dug: Ram sent mail about one of the tests having to change based on ENUM updates
<dug> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-resource-access/2011Mar/0005.html
Doug: I can update the tests
<dug> -q
<dug> is that dave?
<asoldano> sorry, cheated again by EU and US chaning time in different weeks
Discussion of checking test coverage
Bob: We will do nxn tests pairwise and remotely
Li: Update your address in the table
Gil: I will have the Oracle
endpoint public by end of the week
... Oracle client implementation will take a couple of
weeks
Li: I can do that in a couple of days
Bob: Li can you check test coverage?
Li: There may be one change needed
Doug: I will send out note when the docs are updated ... 3/24
Bob: Target publication date the week of April 4
Yves: Will there be a change in the namespaces?
Bob: Change namespace date to
3/29
... estimated publication date April 15 or so
... minimum CR period brings us out to May 6
... there are no features at risk
... Is this a good target?
No objections
Bob: We will meet next week and tighten up some of the dates
<dug> testing
Bob: we need a meeting next week to have a vote on the docs
Ram: I will not be able to attend
Bob: Shall we do an email
ballot
... if we get the docs on 3/24 can we have a ballot on
3/29?
<dug> test
<Bob_> ACTION: Yves set up wbs for cr ballot [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2011/03/22-ws-ra-minutes.html#action01]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-178 - Set up wbs for cr ballot [on Yves Lafon - due 2011-03-29].
Bob: Yves, could you set up a ballot ... yes/no on each document
<Bob_> conclude by March 19 end of business
<asoldano> bye
Adjourned
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.135 of Date: 2009/03/02 03:52:20 Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00) Found ScribeNick: Ashok Inferring Scribes: Ashok WARNING: No "Present: ... " found! Possibly Present: Ashok_Malhotra Bob Bob_ Bob_Freund Doug Doug_Davis Dug1 Gil Gilbert_Pilz Microsoft Ram Yves aaaa aabb aacc asoldano dug gpilz joined li proposal scribenick trackbot ws-ra You can indicate people for the Present list like this: <dbooth> Present: dbooth jonathan mary <dbooth> Present+ amy Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-resource-access/2011Mar/0009.html WARNING: No meeting chair found! You should specify the meeting chair like this: <dbooth> Chair: dbooth Found Date: 22 Mar 2011 Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2011/03/22-ws-ra-minutes.html People with action items: yves[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]