See also: IRC log
<trackbot> Date: 08 March 2011
<scribe> Scribe: Mark
http://www.w3.org/2011/02/22-soap-jms-minutes.html
No objections to approving the minutes
Agenda approved as-is
We will defer the question of skipping next week's call until the end
Daylight saving starts in the US next week
(Check the timeandate.com link )
Topic Action Items
Eric: action-244 - CXF *does*
support WSDL
... ( judging by the samples they have)
... (which use the extension elements)
... Will email the CXF list to confirm
... action-245 - Yves was initally negative, but t hat might be
down to a misunderstanding... Eric is clarifying
Derek: action-222 - QA dept. will look at this later in April. They had some reservations about using CXF - would prefer to test with another vendor's product
Eric: TIBCO can sympathise -
customers may prefer to see interoperability with a commercial
product - bu tthen Progress's implementation is likely to be
based on CXF
... Problems are likely to be logistic and bureaucratic
Format of implementation compliance report
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-soap-jms/2011Mar/0000.html
Mark: Gives overview of test report format
Eric: Tempted by XML and a stylesheet but don't want to over-engineer
action mark to produce a complete vesion of the test results template
<trackbot> Created ACTION-246 - Produce a complete vesion of the test results template [on Mark Phillips - due 2011-03-15].
Eric: Doesn't need to be
super-formal - but it gives us a template to follow
... Once we have a template we should circle back to CXF to ask
them if they'd submit a version (Eric can have a first stab at
this)
... Main use for these documents would be as evidence of
implementations to the W3C
Matthew: Some observations about
the test suite...
... It's not always clear about the criteria for determining
pass/fail
... For example, no complete WSDL documents
... Are the messages rough examples, or the precise message
which must be sent received.... what if the ordering is
different or additional elements are present
Eric: Don't want to overwork this, but if there are specific examples then please submit them
Matthew: OK, as IBM develops tests, WSDL will be developed... Could give that WSDL back to the test suite
Eric: We're not looking to test the SOAP, just the SOAP/JMS additions to the messages...
Matthew: Will submit issues to the group if defects are found in the tests (e.g. possible defect in Testcase 9)
Eric: Test changes have been following a slightly more lightweight process than spec. changes - we do not check the application of changes - so some defects may have crept in
Nothing new
Nothing new
We will plan for a call next week - will be cancelled if nothing to say
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.135 of Date: 2009/03/02 03:52:20 Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00) No ScribeNick specified. Guessing ScribeNick: mphillip Found Scribe: Mark Default Present: alewis, Derek, +44.238.026.aaaa, +1.650.846.aabb, Mark, eric, mgolbyki Present: alewis Derek +44.238.026.aaaa +1.650.846.aabb Mark eric mgolbyki Regrets: Phil Found Date: 08 Mar 2011 Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2011/03/08-soap-jms-minutes.html People with action items: WARNING: Input appears to use implicit continuation lines. You may need the "-implicitContinuations" option.[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]