W3C

- DRAFT -

SV_MEETING_TITLE

03 Feb 2011

See also: IRC log

Attendees

Present
Bob_Powers, +1.610.651.aaaa, +1.518.276.aabb, +20416aacc, [IPcaller], EricP, +1.781.431.aadd
Regrets
Chair
SV_MEETING_CHAIR
Scribe
bobP

Contents


Scott: TMO summary

Michel: Finishing up the final revisions for paper

<mscottm> Joanne is "herding all the cats" - nice :)

Michel: draft ready today, submission early next week
... then want to look at specific tasks: SNPs and genetic variation
... looking at genetic testing, alleles and significance
... Matthias organizing paper around this
... then we want to develop more semantically interlinked clinical records
... reaching out to see if others have places to incorporate semweb

Scott: We have an inviation for a special issue; how to RDFize SNP identifiers and connect to patient data
... also TMO, the podium presentation was accepted at TBI

Joanne: Conference is March 7-9

<ericP> per inviting EHR systems, Ben Adida of Indivo is already interested in expressing their EHRs in RDF. I2B2 folks still more skeptical

Scott: Recently ran across person in Harland's(?) group
... Task force is TM or TMO? Recently blogged about the task forces.

<mscottm> Didn't actually blog about the task forces yet http://www.w3.org/blog/hcls

Susie: Make sure that messaging is well described going forward.
... TMO, not just focussed on ontology any more

Scott: Terminology task force: Picking up again
... trying to talk about clinical reports, in context of breast cancer
... having trouble getting matched records about same patient
... but we've gotten some good data, now looking at how to RDFize
... triple store is coming soon
... complicating factor is that hospitals are just now starting to put records on-line
... situation is still settling as to contents
... US radiology systems are isolated, not normalized

Joanne: Would like to see more Terminology-TMO cooperation
... can we combine triple stores?

<matthias_samwald> (just dialed in again)

Scott: Focussed now on breast cancer in Terminology
... we could consider how to work w. i2b2, of interest to everybody

ericP: Tim Lebo working on EHR expression

Susie: i2b2 has ontology hive, is a navigable tree

ericP: They are talking about hierarchy of terms; provide tree-space for finding concepts
... but no real graph

Susie: i2b2 has talked about integrating actual ontologies

ericP: i2b2 may be using OWL in the snomed-mapping sense
... Integrating TMO w Terminology: Tim Lebo working on EHR modelling in EHR

<mscottm> ACTION: Scott gives sample RDF to Tim to put in Indivo [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2011/02/03-hcls-minutes.html#action01]

ericP: give Tim what to express

Scott: LODD, want an article that summarizes best practices
... Elgar made a work-flow diagram
... two main use cases: relational and XML
... Indivo XML, explaining how it works, fallback position

Joanne: RPI is giving a hands-on tutorial at CSHALS
... LODD and RPI group should review tutorial
... outline for tutorial is on the CSHALS site

Scott: LODD contents is mostly on the wiki
... Where does following your nose w. cool URIs lead?
... Ex, when you have data where URIs don't resolve, this has always been one of the foo-bar problems
... extra effort to produce resolvable URIs, then this is where there will be gaps
... so think of federated systems as a stop-gap
... on the way to deep semantic views
... create semweb with federated views, even if URIs don't resolve by themselves

Susie: Focus of paper should be around helping people use the data
... but, when to federate is an interesting topic

Scott: BioRDF is developing nicely, sign-on from interested parties
... NIST will tell us about microarray requirements

Joanne: We are covering microarray in the tutorial

Scott: Attach gene lists to mage-tabs
... one of the steps, then we need an RDF analogue for gene lists; all has gotten started
... Gene Atlas group is finishing up some RDF
... hoping to hear from them about results, hopefully align all this
... There are some datasources that will roll in
... OPS Open Pharmacological Space
... such projects will create some data, have written on the blog about this

<mscottm> s/NIF/NIST/

Summary of Action Items

[NEW] ACTION: Scott gives sample RDF to Tim to put in Indivo [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2011/02/03-hcls-minutes.html#action01]
 
[End of minutes]

Minutes formatted by David Booth's scribe.perl version 1.135 (CVS log)
$Date: 2011/02/03 17:04:04 $

Scribe.perl diagnostic output

[Delete this section before finalizing the minutes.]
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.135  of Date: 2009/03/02 03:52:20  
Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/

Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00)

FAILED: s/NIF/NIST/
No ScribeNick specified.  Guessing ScribeNick: bobP
Inferring Scribes: bobP

WARNING: No "Topic:" lines found.

Default Present: Bob_Powers, +1.610.651.aaaa, +1.518.276.aabb, +20416aacc, [IPcaller], EricP, +1.781.431.aadd
Present: Bob_Powers +1.610.651.aaaa +1.518.276.aabb +20416aacc [IPcaller] EricP +1.781.431.aadd

WARNING: No meeting title found!
You should specify the meeting title like this:
<dbooth> Meeting: Weekly Baking Club Meeting


WARNING: No meeting chair found!
You should specify the meeting chair like this:
<dbooth> Chair: dbooth

Got date from IRC log name: 03 Feb 2011
Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2011/02/03-hcls-minutes.html
People with action items: gives rdf sample scott

WARNING: No "Topic: ..." lines found!  
Resulting HTML may have an empty (invalid) <ol>...</ol>.

Explanation: "Topic: ..." lines are used to indicate the start of 
new discussion topics or agenda items, such as:
<dbooth> Topic: Review of Amy's report


[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]