See also: IRC log
<trackbot> Date: 18 January 2011
<nyoung> I'm gonna hang up my phone and listen at David's desk
PROPOSAL: Accept the minutes of last meeting
<boris> +1
+1
RESOLUTION: PROPOSAL accepted
<boris> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/actions/91
<mhausenblas> ACTION-91?
<trackbot> ACTION-91 -- Michael Hausenblas to move accepted TC from wiki to http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/test-cases/ -- due 2011-01-25 -- OPEN
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/actions/91
<boris> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/wiki/R2RML_Test_Cases_v1
boris, I just updated the wiki page
<boris> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/wiki/R2RML_Test_Cases_v1
<boris> https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdb2rdf-tests/
scribe: Eric, betehess and I set up a repository to store the files related to the test cases
<mhausenblas> Michael: suggest to create a new page http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/wiki/TestCases and have only the protocol there
mhausenblas: great job
... you might want to create a new page
<Zakim> betehess, you wanted to comment quickly on the repository
betehess: the repository is write-enabled for this WG
mhausenblas: boris, please describe the architecture
<mhausenblas> ACTION-81?
<trackbot> ACTION-81 -- Juan Sequeda to and Eric to draft Direct Mapping TC -- due 2011-01-25 -- OPEN
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/actions/81
boris: 81 is still opened
mhausenblas, richard has 5 actions :-)
richard: no update for me
mhausenblas: any comment?
richard: I have a file ready to
be turned of into issues
... will do whenever I have time
mhausenblas: any other comments?
dmcneil: I have an issue with escaping the { }
<mhausenblas> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdb2rdf-wg/2011Jan/0019.html
<nateyoung> that was David McNeil from Revelytix
dmcneil: the document has not
addressed that at the moment
... we had a problem during the implementation
<nateyoung> he's on the phone, I'm on the IRC :)
juansequeda: we should go back on
track this week
... I believe that MacTed had to do a review
mhausenblas: he is not
around
... but any progress?
juansequeda: hopefully next week
mhausenblas: questions for all
the editors
... I quite often go through the ML
<mhausenblas> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdb2rdf-wg/2010Nov/0086.html
mhausenblas: here is a link to a
discussion between ericP, betehess, you...
... regarding set vs multiset
... I'm not that deep in what in means
... but I'd like to understand if this needs an issue for
that
juansequeda: not sure if that
need a issue
... I'll look at that that
<mhausenblas> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/issues/
juansequeda: ok to check an action on this issue
mhausenblas: ok to split in many
issues
... and one on the multiset issue
... so we can speak about that next week
betehess: please use the ML so we
can help you :-)
... especially because ericP and I initiated the thread
juansequeda: will do
<mhausenblas> ISSUE-X
mhausenblas: please remember to
include the issue number in ML threads
... actually whenever we talk about an issue, like IRC
... there might be another action item
<mhausenblas> ACTION-89?
<trackbot> ACTION-89 -- Michael Hausenblas to create a Linked Data issue and draft proposal to address -- due 2011-01-25 -- OPEN
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/actions/89
mhausenblas: that was part of one of my actions
<mhausenblas> ISSUE-7?
<trackbot> ISSUE-7 -- Linked Data aspects for mapping RDB2RDF -- raised
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/issues/7
mhausenblas: on ISSUE-7
<mhausenblas> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/issues
mhausenblas: I would like to formally propose to open this issue
<mhausenblas> close ACTION-89
<trackbot> ACTION-89 Create a Linked Data issue and draft proposal to address closed
mhausenblas: so the WG can acknoledge officially this issue
<mhausenblas> PROPOSAL: To accept the ISSUE-7
+1
<juansequeda> +1
<cygri> +1
mhausenblas: maybe someone want to take over?
RESOLUTION: the WG accepts the ISSUE-7
<mhausenblas> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdb2rdf-wg/2011Jan/0030.html
<mhausenblas> http://www.example.com/r2rml?string=Paris
juansequeda: I would like to
speak about hhalpin email
... we raised this topic a long time ago
... as the input will always a string
... how to deambiguite
... I'm curious to know what people think about it
... maybe a solution or an idea?
mhausenblas: if you have a string, you have to make sure that these URIs match their expectation
@@: I believe it's another topic
scribe: out of the scope of this group
juansequeda: I agree
... "it's your problem"
mhausenblas: ok but how can we
formalize that?
... as we have to come up with a solution easy enough
... like in term of expectations
... I don't know, but it's part of the challenge there
... it's in the charter
@@: maybe with user defined functions that output in RDF?
juansequeda: with the function
call approach, you may have a problem with the reverse function
needed for SPARQL for example
... if you search about a specific URI
<mhausenblas> Michael: I'm happy to take an action on this to review existing approaches incl. DBpedia and Uberblic lookup, Triplify way, OKKAM, etc and report on the options via the Wiki
juansequeda: so it may need to work both ways
mhausenblas: it makes sense that
I take an action on that
... and see what people out there actually do
<mhausenblas> ACTION: soeren to create Wiki page with options for disambiguation interface for well-known entities identifier [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2011/01/18-rdb2rdf-minutes.html#action01]
<trackbot> Sorry, couldn't find user - soeren
<mhausenblas> ACTION: Auer to create Wiki page with options for disambiguation interface for well-known entities identifier [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2011/01/18-rdb2rdf-minutes.html#action02]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-94 - Create Wiki page with options for disambiguation interface for well-known entities identifier [on Sören Auer - due 2011-01-25].