<trackbot> Date: 21 December 2010

<eric> Peter, are you going to make it on the phone?

Appointment of the scribe

<scribe> Scribe: Mark

Approval of prior meeting minutes

No objections to approving minutes

Review the agenda

We will skip the meeting on 28th Dec.

Assume meeting of 4th Jan will proceed

Review Action Items

Mark: Acions 230, 234, and 235 are done

close action-230

<trackbot> ACTION-230 Apply the changes for ISSUE-67 closed

close action-234

<trackbot> ACTION-234 Apply the resolution for ISSUE-68 closed

close action-235

<trackbot> ACTION-235 Get details of potential BytesMessageproblem closed

Peter: ACTION-233 is done - CXF have implemented the change

close action-233

<trackbot> ACTION-233 Forward proposal for ISSUE-65 to CXF folk for their approval closed

Moving to PR (via CR? & LC)

Waiting for second implementation

Specification Issues:

ISSUE-69 - BytesMessage Ambiguity

<eric> http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/tracker/issues/69

Amy: In favour of amendment

Peter: No objections

RESOLUTION: ISSUE-69 is open

Eric: Wonder if the two MUSTs can be merged into one. Is it testable. Does it warrant a new assertion?

Amy: Don't think it's testable - not based on a documented wire protocol - could be phrased as a warning because results will be unpredictable if writeBytes/readBytes not used

<eric> Alternate: If the message is formatted as a JMS BytesMessage, then the sender and and receiver MUST use the writeBytes() and readBytes() methods, respectively.

RESOLUTION: Eric's amended proposal (above) is accepted

action mark to apply the resolution as written in the chat

<trackbot> Created ACTION-236 - Apply the resolution as written in the chat [on Mark Phillips - due 2010-12-28].

http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/tracker/issues/65

Deferred for a minute

http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/tracker/issues/67

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-soap-jms/2010Dec/0011.html

http://dev.w3.org/2008/ws/soapjms/soapjms.html

<eric> http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2008/ws/soapjms/soapjms.xml.diff?r1=1.105&r2=1.106&f=h

Correct specification link and diff link above

RESOLUTION: Application of resolution for ISSUE-67 is accepted

Back to ISSUE-65: http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/tracker/issues/65

<eric> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-soap-jms/2010Dec/0001.html

RESOLUTION: Proposal of resolution for ISSUE-65 is accepted

<scribe> ACTION: Mark to apply the resolution for ISSUE-65 [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2010/12/21-soap-jms-minutes.html#action01]

<trackbot> Created ACTION-237 - Apply the resolution for ISSUE-65 [on Mark Phillips - due 2010-12-28].

http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/tracker/issues/68

<eric> Is this the link: http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2008/ws/soapjms/soapjms.xml.diff?r1=1.106&r2=1.107&f=h

Some discussion on the mailing list on whether the example should use the 4 paramter send method instead of the producer

Amy: It is not incorrect - in some cases it makes sense to use the producer as long as within thread boundaries

Eric: For documentation purposes the more wordy methods in the sample make it clearer

RESOLUTION: Application of resolution for ISSUE-68 is accepted

<scribe> ACTION: mark to roll back incorrectly applied changes to CR [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2010/12/21-soap-jms-minutes.html#action02]

<trackbot> Created ACTION-238 - Roll back incorrectly applied changes to CR [on Mark Phillips - due 2010-12-28].

URI scheme

Unaddressed feedback here: http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss/current/msg02090.html

Eric: Feedback from Tim Bray
... Will respond in the new year once the public review period has closed
... Awaiting feedback from Oracle after reminder

AOB?

None

This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.135  of Date: 2009/03/02 03:52:20  
Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/

Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00)

No ScribeNick specified.  Guessing ScribeNick: mphillip
Found Scribe: Mark
Default Present: +1.919.663.aaaa, alewis, +1.650.846.aabb, eric, +44.196.287.aacc, mark, +1.617.519.aadd, peaston
Present: +1.919.663.aaaa alewis +1.650.846.aabb eric +44.196.287.aacc mark +1.617.519.aadd peaston
Found Date: 21 Dec 2010
Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2010/12/21-soap-jms-minutes.html
People with action items: mark

WARNING: Input appears to use implicit continuation lines.
You may need the "-implicitContinuations" option.