<trackbot> Date: 09 November 2010

<scribe> scribe: peaston

Last weeks minites

Minutes are approved

Review the agenda

Agenda acepted

Administrative items

Eric proposes skipping meeting

Thanksgiving week

Action Items

http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/tracker/actions/open

Close Action-220

<trackbot> ACTION-220 Review the FAQ closed

Close: Action-219

Close Action-219

<trackbot> ACTION-219 Check the test cases are up to date closed

Close ACTION:221

Close Action-221

<trackbot> ACTION-221 Send some orientation material on getting started and running CXF SOAP/JMS tests to Phil closed

Moving to PR (via CR? & LC)

<scribe> ACTION: eric to raise issue on items 2 and 3 of Peter's testing action-219 [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2010/11/09-soap-jms-minutes.html#action01]

<trackbot> Created ACTION-224 - Raise issue on items 2 and 3 of Peter's testing action-219 [on Eric Johnson - due 2010-11-16].

<scribe> ACTION: Peter to apply Action-219 changes to test spec [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2010/11/09-soap-jms-minutes.html#action02]

<trackbot> Created ACTION-225 - Apply Action-219 changes to test spec [on Peter Easton - due 2010-11-16].

Peter to act on items 1,2,3

Review of FAQ followup

Should WSDL2.0 be in FAQ

No-one feels a pressing need for WSDL2.0 be mentioned in FAQ

<scribe> ACTION: Eric to open issue on EXI mail exchange [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2010/11/09-soap-jms-minutes.html#action03]

<trackbot> Created ACTION-226 - Open issue on EXI mail exchange [on Eric Johnson - due 2010-11-16].

Could be an FAQ mention

Phil discussing JAXWS API constants e.g. SOAP/HTTP has 2 different values for SOAP 1.1. and SOAP 1.2

May be that these constants come from other specs

SOAP/JMS has one transport URI

Should SOAP/JMS be friendly and define 2 namespaces, or do we let JAXWS refine this

eric: we should raise this as an issue
... should we add a normative statement to the spec? or an FAQ

phil: feel that we should ward off future issues on distinguishing SOAP versions

Action Phil to raise issue on the SOAP/JMS namespace distiction betweemn SOAP 1.1 and 1.2 and present proposal

<trackbot> Created ACTION-227 - Raise issue on the SOAP/JMS namespace distiction betweemn SOAP 1.1 and 1.2 and present proposal [on Phil Adams - due 2010-11-16].

Specification Issues

AOB

This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.135  of Date: 2009/03/02 03:52:20  
Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/

Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00)

Found Scribe: peaston
Inferring ScribeNick: peaston

WARNING: No "Present: ... " found!
Possibly Present: Close Derek HTML_TF SW_RDB2RDF Team_ Team_Europe UAWG1 WAI_ WAI_PFWG WS_SOAP-JM Yves active alewis eric joined padams2 phil sk soap-jms trackbot
You can indicate people for the Present list like this:
        <dbooth> Present: dbooth jonathan mary
        <dbooth> Present+ amy

Found Date: 09 Nov 2010
Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2010/11/09-soap-jms-minutes.html
People with action items: eric peter

WARNING: Input appears to use implicit continuation lines.
You may need the "-implicitContinuations" option.