W3C

Mobile Web Best Practices Working Group Teleconference

19 Oct 2010

Agenda

See also: IRC log

Attendees

Present
jeffs (+ observer), adam, jo, francois, EdC, Kai_Dietrich, SeanP
Regrets
Chair
Jo
Scribe
francois

Contents


Observer

<jeffs> one of our graduate students (Yerbol Yembergenov) is getting ready to start up with the SVG WG, and if no one minds he will be observing today's BPWG WG meeting

jo: Jeff has an observer. Any objection to that?

[none heard]

Charter extension

jo: Good news is that transition of MWABP to Proposed Recommendation has been approved.
... Congratulations to the group and the editor, Adam!

francois: The Proposed Recommendation phase is targeted towards W3C Membership. During the PR review period (4 weeks minimum), AC reps from members companies are requested to fill out a questionnaire to show support or to request changes in the document. At the end of the review period, the group may have to respond to the comments that may have been received. Nothing to be done during the review period except remind your AC reps to fill out the questionnaire and support the specification as-is.

jo: in short, Adam, you may not entirely be done, beware!
... One thing is sure, the PR review period will go after our charter end date (end of this month).
... What I propose is that we request extension to the end of the year.

francois: No need to meet, no need to have calls indeed during the PR review period.

<jo> PROPOSED RESOLUTION: The BPWG requests extension of its charter to

<jo> 2010-12-31 solely in order to allow Mobile Web Application Best Practices

<jo> to complete its transition to Rec. The WG does not intend to meet other than to review any pR comments and resolve them.

francois: We'll precise that charter extension is solely to assist MWABP to rec

<EdC> +1

<jeffs> +1

<Kai> +1

<SeanP> +1

<adam> +1

+1

RESOLUTION: The BPWG requests extension of its charter to 2010-12-31 solely in order to allow Mobile Web Application Best Practices to complete its transition to Rec. The WG does not intend to meet other than to review any PR comments and resolve them.

<jeffs> +1

jo: Great! (Copyright ©2010, DKA)

Guidelines for Web Content Transformation Proxies

jo: We are to publish the guidelines as a WG Note.

<jeffs> +1 for CT Guidelines for publication as a WG Note

jo: francois and I have prepared the updated draft. Only nits in the Status of this document section.

-> Latest draft of CT guidelines

Most important changes:

[[ The Mobile Web Best Practices Working Group eventually resolved to discontinue the work on this document and to publish it as a Working Group Note. The Working Group hopes that this Note may serve as a basis for discussion and negotiation among players.

Other than changes to this section, the document has not changed since its publication as a W3C Candidate Recommendation. In particular, the use of normative language has been kept as-is. ]]

<jo> PROPOSED RESOLUTION: The BPWG requests publication of the CT Guidelines dated 18 October 2010 as a WG Note

<EdC> +1

<jeffs> +1

<SeanP> +1

<Kai> +1 works for me as written

jo: If everyone agrees here, I suggest we simply resolve to publish that draft as a WG Note.

+1

<adam> +1

RESOLUTION: The BPWG requests publication of the CT Guidelines dated 18 October 2010 as a WG Note

jo: So CT Guidelines done.
... Anything else on that topic?

[none heard]

AOB

jo: As mentioned on the agenda, we are basically done.
... waiting for comments on the MWABP PR
... I suggest that we don't meet in the meantime.

<Kai> Informal gathering?

<jo> PROPOSED RESOLUTION: The WG will not meet again unless there are comments arising from the PR period on MWABP

<Kai> +1

+1

<jeffs> +1

<adam> +1

<SeanP> +1

RESOLUTION: The WG will not meet again unless there are comments arising from the PR period on MWABP

jo: My heart is filled with sorrow for having to put an end to this, as well as joy!

<jo> ACTION-1035?

<trackbot> ACTION-1035 -- Daniel Appelquist to create a plan to raise awareness on mobileOK through some campaign -- due 2009-12-18 -- OPEN

<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/track/actions/1035

<jo> ACTION-1073?

<trackbot> ACTION-1073 -- Jo Rabin to talk with Francois about what is needed to enact the above resolution on CT Guidelines -- due 2010-10-05 -- OPEN

<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/track/actions/1073

jo: Looking at remaining actions. Dan requested that we left action-1035 open, probably as a memorial of some kind.
... next action is done.

close ACTION-1073

<trackbot> ACTION-1073 Talk with Francois about what is needed to enact the above resolution on CT Guidelines closed

Jo: Jumping to actions that are pending reviews

ACTION-1072?

<trackbot> ACTION-1072 -- François Daoust to prepare distribution of comments for BP2. -- due 2010-10-05 -- PENDINGREVIEW

<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/track/actions/1072

close ACTION-1072

<trackbot> ACTION-1072 Prepare distribution of comments for BP2. closed

ACTION-1074?

<trackbot> ACTION-1074 -- François Daoust to send transition request to PR for MWABP -- due 2010-10-05 -- PENDINGREVIEW

<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/track/actions/1074

close ACTION-1074

<trackbot> ACTION-1074 Send transition request to PR for MWABP closed

jo: And that, my dears, should be it.
... No open issues.
... Looking back at actions.

ACTION-1?

<trackbot> ACTION-1 -- Dean Jackson to test action - ignore -- due 2005-07-17 -- CLOSED

<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/track/actions/1

jo: First action was on 17 July 2005, and we went all the way to action 1074. Great!
... Are there any business of any sort you'd like to discuss?

Informal gathering

jo: Kai, you're the party guy, what do you suggest? :)

kai: nothing in particular, did you have anything in mind?

jo: not really, it's not in our power to request another meeting, unfortunately.
... let's leave that as an open thought
... I'd like to add some personal thanks on record.

<jeffs> +1 to applause for W3C team members Dom and Francois

<adam> +1

jo: First of all, I'd like to thank Dom and Francois for their fantastic support from W3C side.

<EdC> +1

<Kai> +1, well done and thank you so much!

[fd: merci!]

<jo> PROPOSED RESOLUTION: WG would like to thank FD and preceding Team Reps, especially Dom for their unparalleled support

<EdC> +1

<jeffs> +1

<Kai> +1

RESOLUTION: WG would like to thank FD and preceding Team Reps, especially Dom for their unparalleled support

jo: Secondly, I'd like to thank Eduardo and Tom Hume to have contributed as Invited Experts. Eduardo, I'd really like to thank you for the quality of your consistent technical comments

<jo> PROPOSED RESOLUTION: WG expresses its sincere thanks to EdC and Tom for their contributions to the WG

<SeanP> +1

<adam> +1

<jeffs> +1

<Kai> +1

+1

RESOLUTION: WG expresses its sincere thanks to EdC and Tom for their contributions to the WG as Invited Experts

jo: With that, I'd like to thank my colleague Dan Appelquist, and I think we're done!

Kai: well, not quite. We'd like to thank you as well!

<jeffs> many thanks to Jo and Dan for their great work keeping the meetings productive and on-track without losing their great senses of humor

<jo> [thanks!]

<jo> EdC yes!

PROPOSED RESOLUTION: WG expresses its sincere thanks to Dan and Jo to have lead the boat from start to end!

<Kai> +1

<EdC> +1

<jeffs> +1

<adam> +1

+1

<Kai> you won't get off that easily :-)

<SeanP> +1

RESOLUTION: WG expresses its sincere thanks to Dan and Jo to have lead the boat from start to end!

jo: No further calls from the time being.

[call adjourned]

Summary of Action Items

[End of minutes]

Minutes formatted by David Booth's scribe.perl version 1.135 (CVS log)
$Date: 2010/10/19 14:26:37 $