See also: IRC log
First Report from Privacy and data usage control - Rigo
http://www.w3.org/2010/policy-ws/
<rigo> http://www.w3.org/2010/policy-ws/agenda.html
well attended
tbl was there for 2 days (!)
first day - Frederick Hirsch introduced DAP issues
absence of legal people
scribe: in the london workshop
real life issues from a telco....combine FB + AddressBook etc - real issues
everybody who as an AD and Web browser is a "data controller"
data protection directives....developers do not know the boundaries
need clear rules...good behaviour needed
EG: use of MAC address to find me....going beyond "expectations"
Nick Doty paper: simple policy negotiation mechanism
Suggestion: serialise P3P in JSON vocab - combine resulting semantics with Nick's work...
more research in UI....more guidelines....W3C needs to change the paradigm of the hand-off of the UI....
in Privacy...we (w3c) needs to more proactive and making UI more "aware"
Michael Hart paper: simple tagging system - resulting tag cloud was pretty precise
2nd Day - shaped by prez by Hal Abelson
<rigo> http://www.w3.org/2010/api-privacy-ws/papers/privacy-ws-37.html
Asks: "why are we doing all that"
Principle: I expect that this will not harm me....we need to protect these
EG: getting sacked for posting unsavoury photos on SN
Combine with Data Usage Rules - eg bar the HR dept from using this content
Solutions proposed by Yang + Jae (simple approach)
David Chadwick paper: lots of XACML work....complicated
Truth - in the middle
Market in the data-usage control (back end)
At the front end - market not so clear
How to get them to care?
Conclusion: propose a lightweight access to the API
What is the link between all these workshop?
<rigo> http://www.w3.org/News/2010.html#entry-8902
<rigo> http://www.iab.org/about/workshops/privacy
IAB workshop will be "broader"
IETF required a "security" section in all RFCs....perhaps need a "Privacy" section too...
Mac Address issue - rigo to post link to public-policy list
<rigo> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-privacy/
MAWG Feedback - RI to respond - "we are not happy" - but will not hold u up....
Meeting closed