W3C

- DRAFT -

SV_MEETING_TITLE

12 Oct 2010

See also: IRC log

Attendees

Present
Werner, MarkA, tmichel, Joakim, Daniel, Véronique
Regrets
Chair
Daniel
Scribe
Thierry

Contents


<JS> Hello

<scribe> scribe: Thierry

<Vero> http://www.w3.org/2010/10/12-mediaann-minutes.html

Propose to accept previous minutes

http://www.w3.org/2010/10/05-mediaann-minutes.html

no objections

no telecon on tuesday during TPAC as we meet on Thrusday and friday

<Joakim> having problem to call bridge again: +33.4.26.46.79.03

Action items:

close ACTION-223

<trackbot> ACTION-223 Check for overlap between html5 and mawg issues closed

close ACTION-265

<trackbot> ACTION-265 Make a review of media fragments LC doc closed

<scribe> closed ACTION-269

close ACTION-280

<trackbot> ACTION-280 Check the normative parts of the document according to comment 2418 closed

open ACTION-280

reopen ACTION-280

<trackbot> ACTION-280 Check the normative parts of the document according to comment 2418 re-opened

reopen ACTION-283

<trackbot> ACTION-283 Send mail to Geolocation WG for an example, or controlled voca that can be used for the ma:location property re-opened

<Joakim> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2010Oct/0058.html

close ACTION-283

<trackbot> ACTION-283 Send mail to Geolocation WG for an example, or controlled voca that can be used for the ma:location property closed

close ACTION-288

<trackbot> ACTION-288 Unify the XPATH expressions in the mapping tables according to the last substantial comment of Robin closed

<Joakim> no nio

<Joakim> no no

question is accurancy really mandatory?

issue for Daniel was to get some example code to include into our spec

let's wait for geolocation WG response

close ACTION-289

<trackbot> ACTION-289 Deal with the last editorial comment of Robin closed

close ACTION-291

<trackbot> ACTION-291 Put agreed version of ontology to url pointed to by namespace closed

ACTION-293 pending a new version of the property table. raphael should send this new version today

close ACTION-298

<trackbot> ACTION-298 Contact WebIDL for requesting information about the planned direction for the webservices closed

close ACTION-300

<trackbot> ACTION-300 Contact the Geolocation WG and see if they'd be OK to make the accuracy optional closed

close ACTION-303

<trackbot> ACTION-303 Inform the Media Capture WG about our LC document closed

close ACTION-310

<trackbot> ACTION-310 Add hyphens in Java-Script in the figure closed

close ACTION-315

<trackbot> ACTION-315 Update the group web site to reflect the plural in the title and to make working his cvs closed

close ACTION-316

<trackbot> ACTION-316 Pursue development of WebIDL for REST at the Coordination Group meeting closed

reopen ACTION-316

<trackbot> ACTION-316 Pursue development of WebIDL for REST at the Coordination Group meeting re-opened

close ACTION-317

<trackbot> ACTION-317 Ping tobias about reply to media fragments guys comments closed

close ACTION-322

<trackbot> ACTION-322 Send mail to api doc editors to attend call next week closed

close ACTION-323

<trackbot> ACTION-323 Book telecon bridge for api call closed

the LC Comments status is as follows:

=====

Agreed: Commenter approved disposition

******

-- LC Comment -2389 on Media Ontology spec

-- LC Comment -2398 on Media Ontology spec (jose)

-- LC Comment -2403 on Media Ontology spec

-- LC Comment -2404 on Media Ontology spec

-- LC Comment -2410 on Media API spec Jo Rabin

-- LC Comment -2394 on Media API spec (timeless : need to send final draft for review.).

<scribe> On going (response from commenter- partial or no agreement):

***********************************************************

** LC Comment -2393 on Media Ontology spec (deasagree for speex or VP8 and codec)

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2010Sep/0245.html

--> ACTION: Thierry to investigate.

** LC Comment -2405 on Media Ontology spec (Doug)

satisfied by our response but would like to see it in the spec.

Confused by your solution around the "ma" prefix, and would like to

see it in writing.

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2010Oct/0021.html

--> ACTION: Véronique to see with Raphael or Wonsuk about new wording in the spec

** LC Comment -2418 on Media Ontology spec (need to respond to 3 unsolved issues) see to do

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2010Sep/0242.html

--> ACTION: Véronique to investigate 3 unsolved issues

--------------

** LC Comment -2395 on Media API spec(deasagree for speex or VP8 and codec)

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2010Sep/0246.html

--> ACTION: Thierry to investigate.

** LC Comment -2419 on Media API spec (need to respond to unsolved issues)

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2010Sep/0233.html

Proposal from Chris:

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2010Oct/0045.html

--> ACTION: Chris to investigate unsolved issues)

** LC Comment -2406 on Media API spec (Doug)

Should discuus this further with Doug during a telecon. Doug should provide Scenario. Doug kind of agree ... should make this statement more clear.

http://lists.w3.org/A

LC comment Ontology

LC Comment -2405 is almost done. We have resolve the intro and dublin core issue in the latest draft

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2010Oct/0054.html

werner Also I don't understand his conclusion.

he says we have many

details for video formats, which is not true also.

PCM is practically uncompresssed

but all the audio

format parameters seem to assume that audio will be accessed in PCM

format such as audio/L16

not sure were this comes from ?

1 - we don't know how he comes to this conclusion about

2 size of a video 8 bits per channel is not specified

so there are not so many details for video formats in the Media API spec

LC Comment -2419 on Media API spec (need to respond to unsolved issues)

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2010Sep/0233.html

Proposal from Chris:

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2010Oct/0045.html

All to review Chris proposal

Summary of Action Items

[End of minutes]

Minutes formatted by David Booth's scribe.perl version 1.135 (CVS log)
$Date: 2010/10/12 14:28:28 $

Scribe.perl diagnostic output

[Delete this section before finalizing the minutes.]
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.135  of Date: 2009/03/02 03:52:20  
Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/

Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00)

No ScribeNick specified.  Guessing ScribeNick: tmichel
Found Scribe: Thierry

WARNING: Dash separator lines found.  If you intended them to mark
the start of a new topic, you need the -dashTopics option.
For example:
        <Philippe> ---
        <Philippe> Review of Action Items

Default Present: +1.201.807.aaaa, wbailer, MarkA, tmichel, joakim
Present: +1.201.807.aaaa wbailer MarkA tmichel joakim

WARNING: No meeting title found!
You should specify the meeting title like this:
<dbooth> Meeting: Weekly Baking Club Meeting

Got date from IRC log name: 12 Oct 2010
Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2010/10/12-mediaann-minutes.html
People with action items: 

WARNING: Input appears to use implicit continuation lines.
You may need the "-implicitContinuations" option.
[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]