See also: IRC log
<trackbot> Date: 28 September 2010
<fjh> ScribeNick: shivaram
<fjh> TPAC registration and planning
<fjh> Please complete WG questionnaire: http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/42458/tpac2010xmlsec/
<fjh> If attending remember to complete TPAC registration (separate from WG questionnaire)
<fjh> http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35125/TPAC2010reg/
<fjh> WG members expressed dismay at the length of time, almost a year, since the process to resolve ISSUE-91 started, and expressed the desire to obtain results
<fjh> WG members noted that W3 can issue formal request for disclosure at CR stage
<fjh> question - we might not need to create a PAG in order to make this request
<fjh> ACTION: tlr to answer whether W3 can make formal request for IPR disclosure without creating a PAG, and if so, does this happen when entering CR or earlier [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2010/09/28-xmlsec-minutes.html#action01]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-672 - Answer whether W3 can make formal request for IPR disclosure without creating a PAG, and if so, does this happen when entering CR or earlier [on Thomas Roessler - due 2010-10-05].
<fjh> ACTION: tlr to outline process for starting a PAG and share with WG [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2010/09/28-xmlsec-minutes.html#action02]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-673 - Outline process for starting a PAG and share with WG [on Thomas Roessler - due 2010-10-05].
<fjh> scantor: whatever specs the WG produces should be implementable by open source community
<fjh> gerald: an approach is to make ECC mandatory since algorithms are needed
Gerald-E: as a user we build products for a life time where we need to maintain longterm data security
<fjh> Approve 21 September 2010 minutes
<fjh> http://www.w3.org/2010/09/21-xmlsec-minutes.html
<fjh> Proposed RESOLUTION: Minutes from 21 September 2010 approved.
RESOLUTION: Minutes from 21 September 2010 approved
<fjh> Updated public papers portion of web site
<fjh> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-xmlsec/2010Sep/0012.html (Frederick)
<fjh> 3b) Updated "XML Security RELAX NG Schemas" to include RNG as well as RNC forms
<fjh> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec/2010Sep/0057.html (Frederick)
<fjh> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec/2010Sep/0052.html
scantor: fixed editorial issues.
Added paragraph on use of KeyInfo for trust establisment
... changed alg info
RESOLUTION: group accepts scantor's proposal, to change both 1.1 and 2.0 specifications
add scantor's proposed text to 2.0 spec
<fjh> ACTION: scantor to update 1.1 with change for X509SerialNumber [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2010/09/28-xmlsec-minutes.html#action03]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-674 - Update 1.1 with change for X509SerialNumber [on Scott Cantor - due 2010-10-05].
<fjh> ACTION-660?
<trackbot> ACTION-660 -- Scott Cantor to propose changes to C14N2 to support enveloped signature -- due 2010-09-14 -- OPEN
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/2008/xmlsec/track/actions/660
scantor to double check ACTION-660
<fjh> ACTION-638?
<trackbot> ACTION-638 -- Scott Cantor to make proposal for ISSUE-210, see also http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec/2010Aug/0043.html (uncomplicate section) -- due 2010-08-31 -- OPEN
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/2008/xmlsec/track/actions/638
<Gerald-E> I will have to send regrets for the face-to-face
<Gerald-E> thanks all..