Bug Triage sub-team - HTML A11Y TF

07 Sep 2010


See also: IRC log


kliehm, Michael_Cooper
Laura_Carlson, Joshue_O'Connor, Marco_Ranon


<scribe> scribe: MichaelC

rrsgaent, make log world

Select a lead

Only two people on call, postponing until more of us here

Modus Operandi

going through "wontfix" bugs

need to verify "fixed" bugs

and look at new bugs

<scribe> -> New a11y bugs in last 2 weeks: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/buglist.cgi?keywords=a11y&chfieldfrom=-2w&chfieldto=Now&chfield=[Bug+creation]

<scribe> -> New bug snapshots http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/HTML/wiki/Bugs/New_A11Y_Bug_Snapshot

We need to catch up on Laura's snapshots, they have new bugs going back to April 2010

once we catch up, she doesn't need to do snapshots, the bugzilla query above will find all new a11y bugs in the past 2 weeks

Laura just needs to tag a11y as appropriate

also need to look at needsinfo

Let's assign 10 new bugs each to decide if a11ytf priority next week

next week, we should start on needsinfo bugs, assign a few each as homework to complete

New bugs

Starting with http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/HTML/wiki/Bugs/New_A11Y_Bug_Snapshot_20100904

filtering out ones already a TF priority

Martin to take 9473, 9474, 9876, 10168, 10450, 10451

Marco to take 10455 10562 10463 10464 10465 10467

Josh to take 10478 10481 10482 10484 10485 10486

Michael to take 10489, 10493, 10494, 10496 10497 10518 10525

determine if these should be a a11ytf bug

(some may have already had that status rejected)

suggest additional work to kickstart activity if possible, e.g., to whom to assign it, any additional info might be needed, etc.

Homework assignments from last week

skipping reviews from Michael and Martin because we don't have any third POV available on those

reviewing Josh's because we're 2nd & 3rd POV

== 9473 ==

<kliehm> http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/issue-109-objection-poll/results

this has been escalated to Tracker, there's a call for objection survey on the change proposal

note: Josh reviewed 9212 instead of 9871, so 9871 is still unreviewed

== 9212 ==

not consensus, partly because not sure we understand this, postponing until Josh back to present his view

== 9216 ==

We reopened as part of a prior triage

<scribe> scribe: MichaelC

Summary of Action Items

[End of minutes]

Minutes formatted by David Booth's scribe.perl version 1.135 (CVS log)
$Date: 2010/09/07 16:18:50 $

Scribe.perl diagnostic output

[Delete this section before finalizing the minutes.]
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.135  of Date: 2009/03/02 03:52:20  
Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/

Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00)

Found embedded ScribeOptions:  -final


Found Scribe: MichaelC
Inferring ScribeNick: MichaelC
Found Scribe: MichaelC
Inferring ScribeNick: MichaelC
Default Present: kliehm, Michael_Cooper
Present: kliehm Michael_Cooper

WARNING: Fewer than 3 people found for Present list!

Regrets: Laura_Carlson Joshue_O'Connor Marco_Ranon
Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-a11y/2010Sep/0048.html
Got date from IRC log name: 07 Sep 2010
Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2010/09/07-a11y-bugs-minutes.html
People with action items: 

WARNING: Input appears to use implicit continuation lines.
You may need the "-implicitContinuations" option.

[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]