W3C

- DRAFT -

XHTML2 Working Group Teleconference

21 Apr 2010

Agenda

See also: IRC log

Attendees

Present
+1.763.767.aaaa, ShaneM, Steven, Gregory_Rosmaita, MoZ(remote), Alessio(remote)
Regrets
Chair
Steven
Scribe
Steven

Contents


<trackbot> Date: 21 April 2010

<Steven> hi

<Steven> Happy birthday fpr yesterday

<Steven> for

<ShaneM> thx

<Steven> Scribe: Steven

PERs

Steven: THe PER of M12N was published this week
... I am now working with the relevant people to get a transition call for the other three.

M12N in RelaxNG

[I hope MoZ is watching]

Steven: So we got the go ahead to publish a note

<oedipus> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xhtml2/2010Apr/0009

Steven: does it match M12N 2e yet?

Shane: Don't think so
... I need to make sure; only a couple of minor tweaks

Steven: I believe MoZ has some errata to give us
... assuming I'm right in thinking that he is the liaison officer for SC34

Shane: We had a problem with XHTML2, but that has nothing to do with this
... It hasn't been published as a note before

Steven: I got the blessing yesterday

<ShaneM> and do you have comments for us Moz? love to get them integrated.

Shane: I would like Markus to read it too

<oedipus> s/SHane/Shane/G

Steven: Please ping him

Shane: I will

<oedipus> Media Types http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/2010/ED-xhtml-media-types-20100218/

<inserted> scribenick: oedipus

SP: best time to push to minimize any potential obstacles; publish 3 notes: XHTML2, RelaxNG and Media Types, would be good to publish all 3 simultaneously

SM: could do

<MoZ> For the moment, Murata San hasn't send me any material

<MoZ> I will push him again for that

SP: would be preferred course of action unless objections

plus 1 to submitting all 3 at once

SP: will keep SM up-to-date on transition call progress

SM: agenda says have publication date

SP: that was a copy-and-paste error

SM: no worries
... any objections to responses sent about query we received?

SP: no objection - did you answer questions

SM: 2 questions

SP: [reading] looks ok to me
... always had leading minus, right?

SM: never raised as issue -- PR is about fixing raised issues
... unofficial response - need to check if crossposted to html-editor as well; sent to www-html
... replied on public-xhtml2 list

SP: thanks shane

[ADJOURN]

Summary of Action Items

[End of minutes]

Minutes formatted by David Booth's scribe.perl version 1.135 (CVS log)
$Date: 2010/04/21 14:05:47 $

Scribe.perl diagnostic output

[Delete this section before finalizing the minutes.]
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.135  of Date: 2009/03/02 03:52:20  
Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/

Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00)

Succeeded: s/yahoooo!//
Succeeded: s/SH/Sh/
Succeeded: s/SH/Sh/
FAILED: s/SHane/Shane/G
Succeeded: i/best time to push to/scribenick: oedipus
Succeeded: s/alway had leading/always had leading/
Found Scribe: Steven
Inferring ScribeNick: Steven
Found ScribeNick: oedipus
ScribeNicks: oedipus, Steven
Default Present: +1.763.767.aaaa, ShaneM, Steven, Gregory_Rosmaita
Present: +1.763.767.aaaa ShaneM Steven Gregory_Rosmaita MoZ(remote) Alessio(remote)
Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xhtml2/2010Apr/0010
Found Date: 21 Apr 2010
Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2010/04/21-xhtml-minutes.html
People with action items: 

[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]