<trackbot> Date: 07 April 2010

<scribe> Meeting: XHTML2 WG Teleconference

M12N PER

Steven: Steven: We have a pub date of tomorrow [Pubrules]

Shane: Is the questionnaire ready?

Steven: Oh! I haven't received that message

Steven: The Bjoern DoC

[Slight modifications made to which specs different comments apply]

Shane: Issue 21, last sentence?

Steven: The question is whether an empty list of URIs is zero URIs or a single empty URI; it makes a difference

Shane: It has always been like this; let me check HTML4. Oh yes, it is a single URI there

Steven: With text that says it is a list in the spec

Shane: We always adopted the DTD as definitiveI could replace the empty string with #implied here

ShaneM: technically it defaults to %XHTML.profile;

Steven: I think it's OK to change it to implied, and it takes away the ambiguity of what an empty string means

ShaneM: note that it does not have a default in the schema implementation

Steven: I'll get on to the comm team about review dates and questionnaire

Relax

mgylling: http://www.itscj.ipsj.or.jp/sc34/open/1409.htm

mgylling: resolution 3
"Resolution 3: Liaison Statement to World Wide Web Consortium (W3C)

SC 34 instructs its Secretariat to forward the following Liaison Statement to W3C.

"SC 34 requests that the Editor's Draft 'XHTML Modularization to RelaxNG' be updated to become a Note, and that some minor bug fixes are incorporated, details of which will be supplied by our liaison officer"."

Shane: If we could publish our work as a note, it would be helpful

Markus: We should get Mohammed in the loop... if the request is declined, we could submit it from Daisy

Steven: Good plan