ISSUE-60: New wording for XMLLiteral context preservation?
XMLLiteral context preservation
New wording for XMLLiteral context preservation?
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- LC Comment - RDFa Core 1.1
- Raised by:
- Manu Sporny
- Opened on:
- 2010-11-12
- Description:
- Submitted by Gregg Kellogg:
Is there new wording for RDFa core 1.1 7.5 step 11 on what needs to be done for XMLLiteral context preservation? I recall that this was essentially going to revert to just xmlns preservation for all in-scope definitions. - Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- Re: Last Call Response to ISSUE-60: XMLLiteral context preservation (from gregg@kellogg-assoc.com on 2011-01-17)
- Last Call Response to ISSUE-60: XMLLiteral context preservation (from msporny@digitalbazaar.com on 2011-01-16)
- RDFa WG telecon minutes for 2011-01-13 (from msporny@digitalbazaar.com on 2011-01-13)
- Re: Telecon Agenda - January 13th 2011, 1400 UTC (from mark.birbeck@webbackplane.com on 2011-01-13)
- Telecon Agenda - January 13th 2011, 1400 UTC (from msporny@digitalbazaar.com on 2011-01-10)
- ISSUE-60 (XMLLiteral context preservation): New wording for XMLLiteral context preservation? [LC Comment - RDFa Core 1.1] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2010-11-12)
Related notes:
More information here:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdfa-wg/2010Oct/0256.html
Closing issue, the person that raised the issue is happy with the RDFa WG decision.
Manu Sporny, 1 Feb 2011, 14:33:06Display change log