ISSUE-60: New wording for XMLLiteral context preservation?

XMLLiteral context preservation

New wording for XMLLiteral context preservation?

State:
CLOSED
Product:
LC Comment - RDFa Core 1.1
Raised by:
Manu Sporny
Opened on:
2010-11-12
Description:
Submitted by Gregg Kellogg:

Is there new wording for RDFa core 1.1 7.5 step 11 on what needs to be done for XMLLiteral context preservation? I recall that this was essentially going to revert to just xmlns preservation for all in-scope definitions.
Related Actions Items:
No related actions
Related emails:
  1. Re: Last Call Response to ISSUE-60: XMLLiteral context preservation (from gregg@kellogg-assoc.com on 2011-01-17)
  2. Last Call Response to ISSUE-60: XMLLiteral context preservation (from msporny@digitalbazaar.com on 2011-01-16)
  3. RDFa WG telecon minutes for 2011-01-13 (from msporny@digitalbazaar.com on 2011-01-13)
  4. Re: Telecon Agenda - January 13th 2011, 1400 UTC (from mark.birbeck@webbackplane.com on 2011-01-13)
  5. Telecon Agenda - January 13th 2011, 1400 UTC (from msporny@digitalbazaar.com on 2011-01-10)
  6. ISSUE-60 (XMLLiteral context preservation): New wording for XMLLiteral context preservation? [LC Comment - RDFa Core 1.1] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2010-11-12)

Related notes:

More information here:

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdfa-wg/2010Oct/0256.html

Manu Sporny, 12 Nov 2010, 19:22:41

Closing issue, the person that raised the issue is happy with the RDFa WG decision.

Manu Sporny, 1 Feb 2011, 14:33:06

Display change log ATOM feed


Chair, Staff Contact
Tracker: documentation, (configuration for this group), originally developed by Dean Jackson, is developed and maintained by the Systems Team <w3t-sys@w3.org>.
$Id: 60.html,v 1.1 2015/03/27 14:12:25 vivien Exp $