ISSUE-134: Section 7.5, Step 11 Ambiguity in RDFa Core 1.1
processing step clarification
Section 7.5, Step 11 Ambiguity in RDFa Core 1.1
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- RDFa Core, Lite, and XHTML+RDFa CR comments
- Raised by:
- Ivan Herman
- Opened on:
- 2012-04-23
- Description:
- Raised on behalf of Alex Milowski, see his mail:
http://www.w3.org/mid/CABp3FNJ9FWvWiBwYJp0ybEDuEC4430OuyrnTOmD=UkQUzmLD6A@mail.gmail.com
The request is to modify one of the clauses in the processing step descriptions as follows:
"if the @rel, @rev, and @content attributes are not present and one of
@resource, @href, or @src are present, as a resource obtained from one
of the following:" - Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- Re: ISSUE-134 (processing step clarification): Section 7.5, Step 11 Ambiguity in RDFa Core 1.1 [RDFa Core, Lite, and XTHML+RDFa CR comments] (from alex@milowski.com on 2012-04-25)
- RE: ISSUE-134 (processing step clarification): Section 7.5, Step 11 Ambiguity in RDFa Core 1.1 [RDFa Core, Lite, and XTHML+RDFa CR comments] (from grantsr@gmail.com on 2012-04-24)
- Re: Telecon Agenda - April 26th 2012, 1500 UTC (from scorlosquet@gmail.com on 2012-04-24)
- Re: Telecon Agenda - April 26th 2012, 1500 UTC (from ivan@w3.org on 2012-04-24)
- Re: Telecon Agenda - April 26th 2012, 1500 UTC (from ivan@w3.org on 2012-04-23)
- Re: ISSUE-134 (processing step clarification): Section 7.5, Step 11 Ambiguity in RDFa Core 1.1 [RDFa Core, Lite, and XTHML+RDFa CR comments] (from ivan@w3.org on 2012-04-23)
- ISSUE-134 (processing step clarification): Section 7.5, Step 11 Ambiguity in RDFa Core 1.1 [RDFa Core, Lite, and XTHML+RDFa CR comments] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2012-04-23)
Related notes:
Discussed here:
http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/meetings/2012-04-26#ISSUE__2d_134__3a__RDFa_Core_1__2e_1__2c__Section_7__2e_5__2c__Step_11_wording_ambiguity
RESOLVED: Regarding Section 7.5, Step 11, while the text is not as clear as it should be, making a change at this point could be more problematic than leaving the text as is.
http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/meetings/2012-04-26#resolution_3
Response from submitter:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdfa-wg/2012Apr/0149.html
Display change log