13:58:44 <RRSAgent> logging to http://www.w3.org/2011/05/05-rdfa-irc
RRSAgent IRC Bot: logging to http://www.w3.org/2011/05/05-rdfa-irc ←
13:58:46 <trackbot> RRSAgent, make logs world
Trackbot IRC Bot: RRSAgent, make logs world ←
13:58:48 <trackbot> Zakim, this will be 7332
Trackbot IRC Bot: Zakim, this will be 7332 ←
13:58:48 <Zakim> ok, trackbot; I see SW_RDFa()10:00AM scheduled to start in 2 minutes
Zakim IRC Bot: ok, trackbot; I see SW_RDFa()10:00AM scheduled to start in 2 minutes ←
13:58:49 <trackbot> Meeting: RDF Web Applications Working Group Teleconference
13:58:49 <trackbot> Date: 05 May 2011
13:58:56 <manu> Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdfa-wg/2011May/0028.html
13:58:59 <manu> Chair: Manu
13:59:10 <manu> Present: Ivan, Ted, Nathan, Benjamin, Manu, ShaneM, Knud
13:59:57 <Zakim> SW_RDFa()10:00AM has now started
Zakim IRC Bot: SW_RDFa()10:00AM has now started ←
14:00:04 <Zakim> + +1.612.217.aaaa
Zakim IRC Bot: + +1.612.217.aaaa ←
14:00:10 <ShaneM> zakim, I am aaaa
Shane McCarron: zakim, I am aaaa ←
14:00:10 <Zakim> +ShaneM; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +ShaneM; got it ←
14:00:23 <Zakim> +??P16
Zakim IRC Bot: +??P16 ←
14:00:26 <manu> zakim, I am ??P16
Manu Sporny: zakim, I am ??P16 ←
14:00:26 <Zakim> +manu; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +manu; got it ←
14:01:06 <Zakim> + +3539149aabb
Zakim IRC Bot: + +3539149aabb ←
14:01:20 <Knud> zakim, I am +aabb
Knud Möller: zakim, I am +aabb ←
14:01:20 <Zakim> sorry, Knud, I do not see a party named '+aabb'
Zakim IRC Bot: sorry, Knud, I do not see a party named '+aabb' ←
14:01:24 <MacTed> Zakim, code?
Ted Thibodeau: Zakim, code? ←
14:01:24 <Zakim> the conference code is 7332 (tel:+1.617.761.6200 tel:+33.4.26.46.79.03 tel:+44.203.318.0479), MacTed
Zakim IRC Bot: the conference code is 7332 (tel:+1.617.761.6200 tel:+33.4.26.46.79.03 tel:+44.203.318.0479), MacTed ←
14:01:30 <Zakim> +??P25
Zakim IRC Bot: +??P25 ←
14:01:41 <Knud> zakim, I am aabb
Knud Möller: zakim, I am aabb ←
14:01:41 <Zakim> +Knud; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +Knud; got it ←
14:01:42 <Zakim> +Kingsley_Idehen
Zakim IRC Bot: +Kingsley_Idehen ←
14:01:49 <MacTed> Zakim, Kingsley_Idehen is OpenLink_Software
Ted Thibodeau: Zakim, Kingsley_Idehen is OpenLink_Software ←
14:01:50 <Zakim> +OpenLink_Software; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +OpenLink_Software; got it ←
14:01:56 <MacTed> Zakim, OpenLink_Software is temporarily me
Ted Thibodeau: Zakim, OpenLink_Software is temporarily me ←
14:01:56 <Zakim> +MacTed; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +MacTed; got it ←
14:01:56 <Benjamin> zakim, i am +??P25
Benjamin Adrian: zakim, i am +??P25 ←
14:01:56 <Zakim> sorry, Benjamin, I do not see a party named '+??P25'
Zakim IRC Bot: sorry, Benjamin, I do not see a party named '+??P25' ←
14:02:16 <MacTed> Zakim, who's here?
Ted Thibodeau: Zakim, who's here? ←
14:02:16 <Zakim> On the phone I see ShaneM, manu, Knud, ??P25, MacTed
Zakim IRC Bot: On the phone I see ShaneM, manu, Knud, ??P25, MacTed ←
14:02:17 <Zakim> On IRC I see Benjamin, Zakim, RRSAgent, Knud, ShaneM, MacTed, danbri, manu, ivan, webr3, manu1, trackbot
Zakim IRC Bot: On IRC I see Benjamin, Zakim, RRSAgent, Knud, ShaneM, MacTed, danbri, manu, ivan, webr3, manu1, trackbot ←
14:02:20 <Knud> zakim, mute me
Knud Möller: zakim, mute me ←
14:02:20 <Zakim> Knud should now be muted
Zakim IRC Bot: Knud should now be muted ←
14:02:22 <MacTed> Zakim, who's noisy?
Ted Thibodeau: Zakim, who's noisy? ←
14:02:23 <manu> zakim, who is making noise?
Manu Sporny: zakim, who is making noise? ←
14:02:33 <Zakim> MacTed, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: ShaneM (14%), manu (22%), ??P25 (75%)
Zakim IRC Bot: MacTed, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: ShaneM (14%), manu (22%), ??P25 (75%) ←
14:02:43 <Zakim> manu, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: manu (15%), MacTed (19%), ??P25 (48%)
Zakim IRC Bot: manu, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: manu (15%), MacTed (19%), ??P25 (48%) ←
14:02:47 <MacTed> Zakim, ??p25 is Benjamin
Ted Thibodeau: Zakim, ??p25 is Benjamin ←
14:02:47 <Zakim> +Benjamin; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +Benjamin; got it ←
14:03:00 <Benjamin> zakim, mute me
Benjamin Adrian: zakim, mute me ←
14:03:00 <Zakim> Benjamin should now be muted
Zakim IRC Bot: Benjamin should now be muted ←
14:03:16 <MacTed> Zakim, mute me
Ted Thibodeau: Zakim, mute me ←
14:03:18 <Zakim> MacTed should now be muted
Zakim IRC Bot: MacTed should now be muted ←
14:04:07 <manu> Scribe: Knud
(Scribe set to Knud Möller)
14:04:21 <manu> scribenick: Knud
14:05:18 <Knud> Manu: PaySwarm developer sandbox going live today - depends heavily on RDFa and JSON-LD: http://payswarm.com/
Manu Sporny: PaySwarm developer sandbox going live today - depends heavily on RDFa and JSON-LD: http://payswarm.com/ ←
14:05:22 <manu> Sandbox demo details available here: http://payswarm.com/wiki/WordPress_Recipes_Demo
Manu Sporny: Sandbox demo details available here: http://payswarm.com/wiki/WordPress_Recipes_Demo ←
14:05:39 <Zakim> +??P36
Zakim IRC Bot: +??P36 ←
14:05:58 <webr3> zakim, i am ??p36
Nathan Rixham: zakim, i am ??p36 ←
14:05:58 <Zakim> +webr3; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +webr3; got it ←
14:06:51 <manu> Topic: Publish the RDF Interfaces spec as a FPWD
14:07:06 <webr3> -> http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/sources/rdf-interfaces/Overview-src.html
Nathan Rixham: -> http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/sources/rdf-interfaces/Overview-src.html ←
14:07:16 <Knud> Nathan giving update of latest changes, reflecting feedback from RDF Web Apps community and WG members
Nathan giving update of latest changes, reflecting feedback from RDF Web Apps community and WG members ←
14:07:26 <ivan> zakim, dial ivan-voip
Ivan Herman: zakim, dial ivan-voip ←
14:07:26 <Zakim> ok, ivan; the call is being made
Zakim IRC Bot: ok, ivan; the call is being made ←
14:07:27 <Zakim> +Ivan
Zakim IRC Bot: +Ivan ←
14:07:41 <Zakim> -Benjamin
Zakim IRC Bot: -Benjamin ←
14:07:44 <Knud> Nathan: small changes based on feedback
Nathan Rixham: small changes based on feedback ←
14:07:53 <ivan> zakim, dial ivan-voip
Ivan Herman: zakim, dial ivan-voip ←
14:07:53 <Zakim> ok, ivan; the call is being made
Zakim IRC Bot: ok, ivan; the call is being made ←
14:08:13 <Zakim> +??P43
Zakim IRC Bot: +??P43 ←
14:08:23 <Benjamin> zakim, i am ??P43
Benjamin Adrian: zakim, i am ??P43 ←
14:08:23 <Zakim> +Benjamin; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +Benjamin; got it ←
14:08:30 <Zakim> -Ivan
Zakim IRC Bot: -Ivan ←
14:08:35 <Benjamin> zakim, who is making noise?
Benjamin Adrian: zakim, who is making noise? ←
14:08:46 <Zakim> Benjamin, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: manu (28%), webr3 (20%), Benjamin (89%)
Zakim IRC Bot: Benjamin, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: manu (28%), webr3 (20%), Benjamin (89%) ←
14:08:48 <Benjamin> zakim, mute me
Benjamin Adrian: zakim, mute me ←
14:08:49 <Zakim> Benjamin should now be muted
Zakim IRC Bot: Benjamin should now be muted ←
14:09:20 <Knud> Nathan: is "property" a keyword in python?
Nathan Rixham: is "property" a keyword in python? ←
14:09:29 <Knud> Ivan: no, it's not, no problem to use it
Ivan Herman: no, it's not, no problem to use it ←
14:09:56 <manu> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4621718/python-how-to-unshadow-the-keyword-property
Manu Sporny: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4621718/python-how-to-unshadow-the-keyword-property ←
14:09:57 <Knud> Nathan: "property" currently changed to "predicate"
Nathan Rixham: "property" currently changed to "predicate" ←
14:10:34 <Knud> ivan: can't see property keyword in official documentation of python
Ivan Herman: can't see property keyword in official documentation of python ←
14:10:57 <Knud> Ivan: maybe python 3...
Ivan Herman: maybe python 3... ←
14:11:38 <ivan> http://docs.python.org/release/3.1.3/reference/lexical_analysis.html
Ivan Herman: http://docs.python.org/release/3.1.3/reference/lexical_analysis.html ←
14:11:45 <Knud> manu: anyway, we can publish now and change it later, if we have to
Manu Sporny: anyway, we can publish now and change it later, if we have to ←
14:11:47 <webr3> -> 2.7 http://docs.python.org/reference/lexical_analysis.html#keywords
Nathan Rixham: -> 2.7 http://docs.python.org/reference/lexical_analysis.html#keywords ←
14:12:27 <webr3> what would we prefer? .property or .predicate
Nathan Rixham: what would we prefer? .property or .predicate ←
14:12:47 <Knud> ivan: if 2.7 doesn't have property keyword, then 2.4 doesn't either
Ivan Herman: if 2.7 doesn't have property keyword, then 2.4 doesn't either ←
14:13:08 <manu> http://kbyanc.blogspot.com/2007/06/python-property-attribute-tricks.html
Manu Sporny: http://kbyanc.blogspot.com/2007/06/python-property-attribute-tricks.html ←
14:13:17 <Knud> manu: "property" is a built-in function
Manu Sporny: "property" is a built-in function ←
14:13:51 <Knud> manu: do we want to change the spec for this?
Manu Sporny: do we want to change the spec for this? ←
14:15:06 <Knud> manu: in past discussions, we noted that some people have a problem with the term "predicate"
Manu Sporny: in past discussions, we noted that some people have a problem with the term "predicate" ←
14:15:42 <webr3> i can't see anybody who's going to be using or implementing this API having a problem with 'predicate' (personally)
Nathan Rixham: i can't see anybody who's going to be using or implementing this API having a problem with 'predicate' (personally) ←
14:16:22 <Knud> ivan: predicate or property won't make a big difference for RDF community
Ivan Herman: predicate or property won't make a big difference for RDF community ←
14:16:37 <MacTed> Zakim, unmute me
Ted Thibodeau: Zakim, unmute me ←
14:16:37 <Zakim> MacTed should no longer be muted
Zakim IRC Bot: MacTed should no longer be muted ←
14:16:52 <webr3> property = rdf predicates and html rels - joined
Nathan Rixham: property = rdf predicates and html rels - joined ←
14:17:43 <Knud> ivan: "property" for an RDFa person might have a restricted meaning, because of we have @property and @rel
Ivan Herman: "property" for an RDFa person might have a restricted meaning, because of we have @property and @rel ←
14:18:59 <Knud> ted: "attribute" might be universally understood
Ted Thibodeau: "attribute" might be universally understood ←
14:19:03 <webr3> +1 predicate
Nathan Rixham: +1 predicate ←
14:19:53 <Knud> Manu: any concerns for publishing the spec as FPWD?
Manu Sporny: any concerns for publishing the spec as FPWD? ←
14:20:23 <Knud> Ivan: no - whatever we handle today, we handle today. The rest can be in the next version of the spec
Ivan Herman: no - whatever we handle today, we handle today. The rest can be in the next version of the spec ←
14:21:03 <webr3> RDFNode.value is an issue
Nathan Rixham: RDFNode.value is an issue ←
14:21:47 <Knud> Ivan: RDFNode.value naming is still under debate
Ivan Herman: RDFNode.value naming is still under debate ←
14:22:37 <Knud> Ivan: name, lexicalValueare possibilities, but we didn't really like any of them
Ivan Herman: name, lexicalValueare possibilities, but we didn't really like any of them ←
14:23:22 <Knud> Manu: maybe use lexicalValue temporarily, see if community is happy with it?
Manu Sporny: maybe use lexicalValue temporarily, see if community is happy with it? ←
14:24:12 <Knud> Ted: still missing an explicit warning that this whole spec might still change a lot
Ted Thibodeau: still missing an explicit warning that this whole spec might still change a lot ←
14:24:25 <Knud> Ivan: even though it is already labelled "working draft"
Ivan Herman: even though it is already labelled "working draft" ←
14:25:43 <Knud> ivan: however, the overall structure is pretty stable
Ivan Herman: however, the overall structure is pretty stable ←
14:26:02 <Zakim> -ShaneM
Zakim IRC Bot: -ShaneM ←
14:26:02 <Knud> manu: were triplesets taken out entirely?
Manu Sporny: were triplesets taken out entirely? ←
14:26:07 <Knud> nathan: yes, they were
Nathan Rixham: yes, they were ←
14:27:38 <Zakim> +McCarron
Zakim IRC Bot: +McCarron ←
14:27:41 <Knud> ivan: there could be text saying that "RDF WG is working on graph naming - this might find its way into this spec also"
Ivan Herman: there could be text saying that "RDF WG is working on graph naming - this might find its way into this spec also" ←
14:27:45 <Knud> manu: I'd prefer that we tell people that we intend to put in graph naming / graph literals / g-boxes / whatever RDF WG ends up calling them.
Manu Sporny: I'd prefer that we tell people that we intend to put in graph naming / graph literals / g-boxes / whatever RDF WG ends up calling them. ←
14:28:51 <manu> PROPOSAL: Publish the RDF Interfaces as a FPWD, including changes discussed today, with a short-name of rdf-interfaces, with a target publication date of May 10th 2011.
PROPOSED: Publish the RDF Interfaces as a FPWD, including changes discussed today, with a short-name of rdf-interfaces, with a target publication date of May 10th 2011. ←
14:28:54 <ivan> +1
Ivan Herman: +1 ←
14:28:57 <webr3> +1
Nathan Rixham: +1 ←
14:28:58 <manu> +1
Manu Sporny: +1 ←
14:28:58 <Benjamin> +1
Benjamin Adrian: +1 ←
14:29:00 <Knud> Knud: +1
Knud Möller: +1 ←
14:29:13 <Knud> Shane: +1
Shane McCarron: +1 ←
14:29:28 <MacTed> +1
Ted Thibodeau: +1 ←
14:29:41 <manu> RESOLVED: Publish the RDF Interfaces as a FPWD, including changes discussed today, with a short-name of rdf-interfaces, with a target publication date of May 10th 2011.
RESOLVED: Publish the RDF Interfaces as a FPWD, including changes discussed today, with a short-name of rdf-interfaces, with a target publication date of May 10th 2011. ←
14:30:56 <webr3> q+ to say oops, may be a problem with lexicalValue
Nathan Rixham: q+ to say oops, may be a problem with lexicalValue ←
14:31:02 <ivan> q+
Ivan Herman: q+ ←
14:31:07 <Knud> manu: 2nd last call exited without any major criticism
Manu Sporny: 2nd last call exited without any major criticism ←
14:31:09 <manu> ack webr3
Manu Sporny: ack webr3 ←
14:31:09 <Zakim> webr3, you wanted to say oops, may be a problem with lexicalValue
Zakim IRC Bot: webr3, you wanted to say oops, may be a problem with lexicalValue ←
14:32:02 <Knud> nathan: "lexicalValue" not good choice for b-nodes
Nathan Rixham: "lexicalValue" not good choice for b-nodes ←
14:33:01 <Knud> nathan: how about keeping "value" and "valueOf", as it is now?
Nathan Rixham: how about keeping "value" and "valueOf", as it is now? ←
14:33:08 <Knud> ivan: no, that's too misleading
Ivan Herman: no, that's too misleading ←
14:34:28 <Knud> (lots of ideas being thrown around)
(lots of ideas being thrown around) ←
14:34:34 <Knud> manu: nominalValue?
Manu Sporny: nominalValue? ←
14:34:42 <Knud> ivan: hm, not bad
Ivan Herman: hm, not bad ←
14:35:53 <Knud> ivan: maybe put an issue in the document to indicate that this term might change
Ivan Herman: maybe put an issue in the document to indicate that this term might change ←
14:36:23 <Zakim> -McCarron
Zakim IRC Bot: -McCarron ←
14:36:38 <manu> ISSUE: Figure out a word to use when referring to the 'value' of a RDFNode
ISSUE: Figure out a word to use when referring to the 'value' of a RDFNode ←
14:36:38 <trackbot> Created ISSUE-95 - Figure out a word to use when referring to the 'value' of a RDFNode ; please complete additional details at http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/track/issues/95/edit .
Trackbot IRC Bot: Created ISSUE-95 - Figure out a word to use when referring to the 'value' of a RDFNode ; please complete additional details at http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/track/issues/95/edit . ←
14:36:45 <Zakim> +McCarron
Zakim IRC Bot: +McCarron ←
14:37:13 <ivan> q+
Ivan Herman: q+ ←
14:37:25 <manu> ack ivan
Manu Sporny: ack ivan ←
14:37:34 <Knud> Topic: Scheduling RDFa Core and XHTML+RDFa Candidate Recommendation
14:37:54 <Knud> manu: any preference as to the order of publishing these and the RDF API
Manu Sporny: any preference as to the order of publishing these and the RDF API ←
14:38:56 <Benjamin> http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/sources/rdf-api/
Benjamin Adrian: http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/sources/rdf-api/ ←
14:39:08 <Knud> ivan: we should be careful about this. We should publish all parts of the API (RDF API, RDFa API, RDF Interfaces) together.
Ivan Herman: we should be careful about this. We should publish all parts of the API (RDF API, RDFa API, RDF Interfaces) together. ←
14:39:34 <Benjamin> zakim, unmute me
Benjamin Adrian: zakim, unmute me ←
14:39:34 <Zakim> Benjamin should no longer be muted
Zakim IRC Bot: Benjamin should no longer be muted ←
14:39:58 <Knud> Benjamin: document has been cleaned and updated
Benjamin Adrian: document has been cleaned and updated ←
14:41:24 <Knud> manu: some things still need to be done
Manu Sporny: some things still need to be done ←
14:41:51 <webr3> I can do FPWD for interfaces any-time, I've just made all the changes bar adding a note about graph identifiers - can help benjamin w/ rdf-api from tomorrow if that helps
Nathan Rixham: I can do FPWD for interfaces any-time, I've just made all the changes bar adding a note about graph identifiers - can help benjamin w/ rdf-api from tomorrow if that helps ←
14:41:51 <Knud> Manu: I think we should really reserve two weeks for this
Manu Sporny: I think we should really reserve two weeks for this ←
14:43:16 <Benjamin> zakim, mute me
Benjamin Adrian: zakim, mute me ←
14:43:16 <Zakim> Benjamin should now be muted
Zakim IRC Bot: Benjamin should now be muted ←
14:44:17 <Knud> Ivan: why not publish as FPWD as soon as possible, with the caveat that some issues might still need to be resolved afterwards
Ivan Herman: why not publish as FPWD as soon as possible, with the caveat that some issues might still need to be resolved afterwards ←
14:44:33 <Knud> manu: let's see where we stand in a week
Manu Sporny: let's see where we stand in a week ←
14:45:34 <Knud> manu: some issues need to be handled still for RDFa Core Candidate Rec
Manu Sporny: some issues need to be handled still for RDFa Core Candidate Rec ←
14:45:43 <ShaneM> 'the w3c tax'
Shane McCarron: 'the w3c tax' ←
14:46:32 <Knud> Manu: IRI vs URI, CURIE/URI value space collision, fragment id comment from TAG
Manu Sporny: IRI vs URI, CURIE/URI value space collision, fragment id comment from TAG ←
14:46:56 <webr3> iirc - both of those have equiv issues open on the RDF WG too
Nathan Rixham: iirc - both of those have equiv issues open on the RDF WG too ←
14:48:01 <Knud> ivan: CURIE/URI value space collision problem seems to be the one that really needs work
Ivan Herman: CURIE/URI value space collision problem seems to be the one that really needs work ←
14:50:41 <Knud> manu: benjamin and nathan and ivan will work on RDF API FPWD for next week or the week after
Manu Sporny: benjamin and nathan and ivan will work on RDF API FPWD for next week or the week after ←
14:52:01 <Knud> shane: can we have optional test cases for @role?
Shane McCarron: can we have optional test cases for @role? ←
14:52:06 <Knud> manu: yes, we can do that
Manu Sporny: yes, we can do that ←
14:52:41 <Zakim> -webr3
Zakim IRC Bot: -webr3 ←
14:52:43 <Knud> manu: you can commit test cases via github - manu, ivan, and gregg are the contact points for access rights
Manu Sporny: you can commit test cases via github - manu, ivan, and gregg are the contact points for access rights ←
14:52:49 <Knud> manu: Ok, so the plan is for Nathan and Benjamin to work on the RDF API spec and get it in shape for FPWD by next week or the week after. Shane will update RDFa Core and XHTML+RDFa 1.1 for CR while the WG members work on resolving all of the remaining 2nd LC issues.
Manu Sporny: Ok, so the plan is for Nathan and Benjamin to work on the RDF API spec and get it in shape for FPWD by next week or the week after. Shane will update RDFa Core and XHTML+RDFa 1.1 for CR while the WG members work on resolving all of the remaining 2nd LC issues. ←
14:53:22 <manu> Topic: CURIEorURI Value Space Collisions
14:53:27 <manu> http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/track/issues/90
Manu Sporny: http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/track/issues/90 ←
14:53:53 <manu> Niklas Lindström says "The Working Group should consider whether or not CURIEs should be further restricted in order to not conflict with future Internet protocol schemes."
Manu Sporny: Niklas Lindström says "The Working Group should consider whether or not CURIEs should be further restricted in order to not conflict with future Internet protocol schemes." ←
14:54:00 <manu> "For instance, not allowing CURIEs in that space to use anything after the prefix+':' other than say an isegment-nz-nc from RFC 3987, or something to that effect (like a "[A-Za-z0-9_-.]+" regexp)."
Manu Sporny: "For instance, not allowing CURIEs in that space to use anything after the prefix+':' other than say an isegment-nz-nc from RFC 3987, or something to that effect (like a "[A-Za-z0-9_-.]+" regexp)." ←
14:54:23 <Knud> ivan: sounds like a very rare problem
Ivan Herman: sounds like a very rare problem ←
14:55:24 <ivan> what about - db:resource/RRR
Ivan Herman: what about - db:resource/RRR ←
14:56:43 <manu> We could create a CURIE pattern that rejects anything that starts w/ *:// - that is a URL
Manu Sporny: We could create a CURIE pattern that rejects anything that starts w/ *:// - that is a URL ←
14:56:54 <manu> so this is a URL under the new pattern? foo://
Manu Sporny: so this is a URL under the new pattern? foo:// ←
14:57:20 <manu> however, it fails to protect us against this: sip:msporny@digitalbazaar.com
Manu Sporny: however, it fails to protect us against this: sip:msporny@digitalbazaar.com ←
14:58:32 <manu> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdfa-wg/2011Apr/0046.html
Manu Sporny: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdfa-wg/2011Apr/0046.html ←
15:03:30 <Zakim> -Knud
Zakim IRC Bot: -Knud ←
15:05:13 <MacTed> ACTION: manu to respond to Niklas about ISSUE-90 - backwards compat issues, Shane's response and dbpedia example.
ACTION: manu to respond to Niklas about ISSUE-90 - backwards compat issues, Shane's response and dbpedia example. ←
15:05:13 <trackbot> Created ACTION-75 - Respond to Niklas about ISSUE-90 - backwards compat issues, Shane's response and dbpedia example. [on Manu Sporny - due 2011-05-12].
Trackbot IRC Bot: Created ACTION-75 - Respond to Niklas about ISSUE-90 - backwards compat issues, Shane's response and dbpedia example. [on Manu Sporny - due 2011-05-12]. ←
15:05:20 <MacTed> RRSAgent, forget action 1
Ted Thibodeau: RRSAgent, forget ACTION-1 ←
15:05:20 <RRSAgent> I'm logging. I don't understand 'forget action 1', MacTed. Try /msg RRSAgent help
RRSAgent IRC Bot: I'm logging. I don't understand 'forget ACTION-1', MacTed. Try /msg RRSAgent help ←
15:05:23 <Benjamin> bye
Benjamin Adrian: bye ←
15:05:25 <Zakim> -manu
Zakim IRC Bot: -manu ←
15:05:25 <Zakim> -McCarron
Zakim IRC Bot: -McCarron ←
15:05:26 <MacTed> RRSAgent, drop action 1
Ted Thibodeau: RRSAgent, drop ACTION-1 ←
Formatted by CommonScribe
This revision (#1) generated 2011-05-05 15:38:55 UTC by 'msporny', comments: 'Minor fix-ups and changes to publication.'