See also: IRC log
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-mw4d/2010Feb/0002.html
http://www.w3.org/2010/01/18-mw4d-minutes.html
approved
steph: charter http://www.w3.org/2010/01/MW4Dcharter2.html
steph explains the W3C process
nicolas: how long the whole process ?
steph: probably till mid march
nicolas: critical mass ?
steph: issue indeed
mira: how are we going to organize
the big work ?
mira: difficult to select case studies we
select
... on the other hand, focusing on best practices, innovative approached
nicolas: both relevant. how to select them ? that's the question
selecting one domain might be the right way.
do we do our own aggregation ?
mira: lots of difference
nicolas: so look at concept first instead of doing a per domain
?
mira: yes
hard to compare initiatives between them
e.g esoko close to txteagles
lots of government initiative
mira: a way to start this might be to gather input form the groups on examples
on business models, impact, adoption model
impact evaluation
nicolas: bit and pieces in tools and business model around, we can collect
not true for adoption methodology
mira: adoption ?
nicolas: e.g. co-creation
low hanging fruits: impact, business models tools
mira: perhaps reorganizing resources available
nicolas: let's start with this 3 and see if extra work needed ?
mira: +1
<betty> Is it possible to put ideas into a table? The rows are domains. The columns are concepts. W3C members can write from their convenient starting points.
<betty> E.g. I find Mira's ideas is more feasible, since I'm doing impact analysis troughout domains. Other members working on specific domain may find another way around. There'll be compilation of the table towards the end of writing process.
stephane: +1
steph: how do we move on ?
nicolas: start with the three points
and request contribution on th elist
renjish: prioritizing the list first is critical
good approach ?
ordering ?
nicolas: ask the mailing-list with the three and see
Resolution: start to address business model, impact analysis and tools and see who are the contributors
<scribe> ACTION: steph to organize the wiki [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2010/02/15-mw4d-minutes.html#action01]
<scribe> ACTION: stephane identify relevant resources from each theme [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2010/02/15-mw4d-minutes.html#action02]
nicolas: interested to contribute to business model
mira: interested to contribute to impact analysis
<betty> My research is about impact analysis, so I can contribute on that part.
renjish: interested in the all three,
particularly from the agriculture and government aspect
... idneitfying hte question we want to adress in the document ?
for bmodel, you cannot analyze them without impact analysis
so what are the questions ?
steph: good question. we will take one theme per one theme during next call and define the structure of the doc, scope, objectives, etc.
steph: for those interested, and interesting initiative by the telecom regulatory authority of india: http://www.trai.gov.in/WriteReadData/trai/upload/misc/127/Callforpapers.pdf
march 8th