See also: IRC log
Date: 21 Jan 2010
<scribe> Meeting: 165
<scribe> Scribe: Norm
<scribe> ScribeNick: Norm
-> http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2010/01/21-agenda
Accepted.
-> http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2009/01/07-minutes
-> http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2009/01/14-minutes
Accepted.
Norm will do his actions post haste.
Vojtech gives regrets; Norm gives regrets for 4 Feb, will decide whether or not to meet on 4 Feb at the 28 Jan call
Norm: I believe it was approved by W3M, we'll wait for Henry to confirm.
-> http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2010/01/lc-comments/
Vojtech: I think we need to make the context explicit.
Norm: Yes, I think that's an oversight
<scribe> ACTION: Norm to clarify p:string-replace wrt the context node for evaluating the replace example [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2010/01/21-xproc-minutes.html#action01]
Vojtech: That's just a typo, you can't refer to $foo
Norm: Right. My bad.
<scribe> ACTION: Norm to correct the typo in the p:string-replace example wrt $foo in @replace [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2010/01/21-xproc-minutes.html#action02]
Norm: I'll attempt to correct these errors and bring the draft and issues list up to date before the next meeting.
Norm: Thanks for all the new tests, Vojtech!
Vojtech: I added a couple of tests that are meant to test multipart response handling, but we need a server-side response first.
Norm: Right, I'll update the server side.
<scribe> ACTION: Norm to update tests.xproc.org so that there's a server-side script that returns a multipart message [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2010/01/21-xproc-minutes.html#action03]
Vojtech: The example that I saw often includes a MIME-version header. Is that something that is required or recommended?
Norm: I don't think it's required...
Vojtech: Is there another version of MIME?
Norm: No clue. Alex?
Alex: According to Wikipedia, the version is always "1.0"
Norm: Do you have a sense of the coverage?
Vojtech: The last area that I thought was missing was the multipart suppport. But I think we're getting there.
<scribe> ACTION: Norm to regenerate the coverage report [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2010/01/21-xproc-minutes.html#action04]
Vojtech: There are still two
contradictory XML Schema tests.
... I don't remember which tests, but it has to do with default
values for hints.
<scribe> ACTION: Norm to put the conflicting schema tests on the agenda for next week when Henry will be present [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2010/01/21-xproc-minutes.html#action05]
Norm: Can't really make progress without Henry, defer to next week.
Norm: Who's going to XML
Prague?
... I think Mohamed and I are going, anyone else?
Vojtech: I'm not sure.
Alex: I might be in Europe in March, so maybe.
Adjourned.
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.135 of Date: 2009/03/02 03:52:20 Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00) Succeeded: s/tests/tests, Vojtech/ Succeeded: s/There's/There are/ Found Scribe: Norm Inferring ScribeNick: Norm Found ScribeNick: Norm Default Present: Norm, PGrosso, V, Alex_Milows Present: Norm Paul Vojtech Alex Agenda: http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2010/01/21-agenda Found Date: 21 Jan 2010 Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2010/01/21-xproc-minutes.html People with action items: norm[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]