W3C

- DRAFT -

WAI AU

11 Jan 2010

Agenda

See also: IRC log

Attendees

Present
Jan, Jeanne, Greg_Pisocky, JuttaT, AndrewR
Regrets
Ann_M, SueAnn_N., Jeanne_S.
Chair
Jutta Treviranus
Scribe
Jan

Contents


 

 

Cynthia's comments....

B.2.2.8 Metadata for Discovery:

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-au/2009OctDec/0058.html

JT: Learning content management systems do this.

GP: What is meant by this

JT: In IEEE LOM and Dublin Core (?) there is an element where you can put an EARL statement re: the accessibility of a resourece
... Allows learner to search by accessibility requirement...

JR: Is it widely enough implemented

JT: THere is a google service to get this
... Note to put here is that it's not all or nothing - you could declare you need certain checkpoints or guidelines
... Should we refer to the google serveice?

JR: Pls send the URL
... Can put in Related resources

Guideline B.2.5

<scribe> ACTION: JR to Come up with a proposal for bringing in Cynthis'a ideas into B.2.5 without increasing bloat - already 9 SCs [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2010/01/11-au-minutes.html#action01]

<trackbot> Created ACTION-224 - Come up with a proposal for bringing in Cynthis'a ideas into B.2.5 without increasing bloat - already 9 SCs [on Jan Richards - due 2010-01-18].

<scribe> ACTION: JR to Suggest B.2.5 Rationale reword to be positive [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2010/01/11-au-minutes.html#action02]

<trackbot> Created ACTION-225 - Suggest B.2.5 Rationale reword to be positive [on Jan Richards - due 2010-01-18].

Guideline B.3.1

JR: Group present agreed that it wan't important enough to add new SCs

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-au/2010JanMar/0011.html

Action item review

http://www.w3.org/TR/UNDERSTANDING-WCAG20/conformance.html#uc-accessibility-support-head

<scribe> ACTION: JR, JS - get the weekly survey started again [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2010/01/11-au-minutes.html#action03]

<trackbot> Sorry, couldn't find user - JR,

Summary of Action Items

[NEW] ACTION: JR to Come up with a proposal for bringing in Cynthis'a ideas into B.2.5 without increasing bloat - already 9 SCs [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2010/01/11-au-minutes.html#action01]
[NEW] ACTION: JR to Suggest B.2.5 Rationale reword to be positive [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2010/01/11-au-minutes.html#action02]
[NEW] ACTION: JR, JS - get the weekly survey started again [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2010/01/11-au-minutes.html#action03]
 
[End of minutes]

Minutes formatted by David Booth's scribe.perl version 1.135 (CVS log)
$Date: 2010/01/11 21:14:18 $

Scribe.perl diagnostic output

[Delete this section before finalizing the minutes.]
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.135  of Date: 2009/03/02 03:52:20  
Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/

Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00)

No ScribeNick specified.  Guessing ScribeNick: Jan
Inferring Scribes: Jan
Default Present: Jan, Jeanne, Greg_Pisocky, JuttaT, AndrewR
Present: Jan Jeanne Greg_Pisocky JuttaT AndrewR
Regrets: Ann_M SueAnn_N. Jeanne_S.
Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-au/2010JanMar/0012.html
Got date from IRC log name: 11 Jan 2010
Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2010/01/11-au-minutes.html
People with action items: jr

[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]