See also: IRC log
<trackbot> Date: 07 January 2010
<gfreed> partial regrets: geoff f has to leave the call at 11:30.
<Marco_Ranon> probably P32 was me, Marco Ranon. i'm using skype
<Marco_Ranon> i'm on the phone but i ca't hear much
I'll scribe
<scribe> Scribe: Joshue
MS: Lots over overdue actions
<MikeSmithX> action-7?
<trackbot> ACTION-7 -- Gregory Rosmaita to propose braille media type (as opposed to simply tactile) or sub-type after consulting with Braille-in-DAISY and others -- due 2010-01-07 -- OPEN
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/HTML/track/actions/7
MS: I don't see GJR on the call
<MikeSmithX> action-7 due 2010-01-15
<trackbot> ACTION-7 propose braille media type (as opposed to simply tactile) or sub-type after consulting with Braille-in-DAISY and others due date now 2010-01-15
<MikeSmithX> action-6?
<trackbot> ACTION-6 -- Richard Schwerdtfeger to address fragments versus entire pages as alternatives with HTML WG members -- due 2010-01-07 -- OPEN
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/HTML/track/actions/6
MS: Rich, anything to report?
RS: We have to talk about this in the canvas WG
<MikeSmithX> action-6: Rich says they still need to address in Canvas TF
<trackbot> ACTION-6 address fragments versus entire pages as alternatives with HTML WG members notes added
RS: We haven't addressed this yet
MS: Do you want to take another week?
RS: Two weeks please, I'll post to the HTML WG list
<MikeSmithX> action-6 due 2010-01-21
<trackbot> ACTION-6 address fragments versus entire pages as alternatives with HTML WG members due date now 2010-01-21
<MikeSmithX> action-5?
<trackbot> ACTION-5 -- Richard Schwerdtfeger to david Bolter to ask if the use of contenteditable areas for representing rich text with caret position in the shadow dom would be acceptable for HTML 5 and canvas -- due 2010-01-06 -- OPEN
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/HTML/track/actions/5
RS: I did discuss this with David, I will drop him a line. He was to look into this with the Mozilla Team.
<MikeSmithX> action-5: Rich says he talked with davidb and waiting for him to report back
<trackbot> ACTION-5 David Bolter to ask if the use of contenteditable areas for representing rich text with caret position in the shadow dom would be acceptable for HTML 5 and canvas notes added
<MikeSmithX> action-5 due 2010-01-21
<trackbot> ACTION-5 David Bolter to ask if the use of contenteditable areas for representing rich text with caret position in the shadow dom would be acceptable for HTML 5 and canvas due date now 2010-01-21
<MikeSmithX> action-4?
<trackbot> ACTION-4 -- Richard Schwerdtfeger to get back with the Mozilla team to ensure there are no issues with allowing standard HTML5 input controls in the shadow DOM -- due 2010-01-06 -- OPEN
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/HTML/track/actions/4
MS: The last one is also on Rich.
<MikeSmithX> action-4: Rich talked talked with davidb, will follow up with him
<trackbot> ACTION-4 Get back with the Mozilla team to ensure there are no issues with allowing standard HTML5 input controls in the shadow DOM notes added
<MikeSmithX> action-4 due 2010-01-21
<trackbot> ACTION-4 Get back with the Mozilla team to ensure there are no issues with allowing standard HTML5 input controls in the shadow DOM due date now 2010-01-21
RS: I did talk to DavidB on that also. Am pinging him now. Another 2 weeks please.
<MikeSmithX> action-3?
<trackbot> ACTION-3 -- Cynthia Shelly to create revised summary proposal for January 14th, 2010 -- due 2009-12-24 -- OPEN
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/HTML/track/actions/3
<MikeSmithX> action-3: Cynthia met with Wendy, on track for next week
<trackbot> ACTION-3 Create revised summary proposal for January 14th, 2010 notes added
CS: Mine is due next week. I spoke to Wendy about this and it is on track.
MS: Ok
<MikeSmithX> action-4 due 2010-01-14
<trackbot> ACTION-4 Get back with the Mozilla team to ensure there are no issues with allowing standard HTML5 input controls in the shadow DOM due date now 2010-01-14
MS: I will change the due date to the 14th Jan
<MikeSmithX> action-4 due 2010-01-21
<trackbot> ACTION-4 Get back with the Mozilla team to ensure there are no issues with allowing standard HTML5 input controls in the shadow DOM due date now 2010-01-21
<MikeSmithX> action-3 due 2010-01-14
<trackbot> ACTION-3 Create revised summary proposal for January 14th, 2010 due date now 2010-01-14
MS: Next one on GJR also
<MikeSmithX> action-02?
<trackbot> ACTION-2 -- Gregory Rosmaita to deliver draft of change proposal for ARIA additions to HTML 5 by 2009-12-24 -- due 2009-12-24 -- OPEN
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/HTML/track/actions/2
<MikeSmithX> action-2 due 2010-01-14
<trackbot> ACTION-2 Deliver draft of change proposal for ARIA additions to HTML 5 by 2009-12-24 due date now 2010-01-14
MS: I will ask GJR on the list about this one
<MikeSmithX> action-1?
<trackbot> ACTION-1 -- Cynthia Shelly to write overall approach HTML support of ARIA -- due 2009-12-17 -- OPEN
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/HTML/track/actions/1
CS: I have done this
MS: Ok
<MikeSmithX> action-1: Cynthia sent to list
<trackbot> ACTION-1 Write overall approach HTML support of ARIA notes added
<MikeSmithX> close action-1
<trackbot> ACTION-1 Write overall approach HTML support of ARIA closed
MS: First up <canvas>, Rich?
RS: We meet before the break, no
real movement. Am setting up a call. We are discussing the
shadow DOM and content editable sections etc.
... Looking at rendering visual elements of the same components
also.
... Looking at CSS3 media queries, and hooking up with David
Singer. Prob no issue adding additional properties etc but
there should be an alternative even i no absolute match.
... Looking at alternative content, mashups etc. Fragments vs
source objects a la <video> elements. Here you may go to
an external service and grab content.
... There are many APIs for merging content, the question is
for a fragment do we want to support them or have a seperate
page (like in an iframe)
RS; The source for media types is limited, for objects to be pulled in and we need to make sure that we need a fragment - that will change spec
MS: Have you reached concensus, is there a bug?
RS: What is the process? Discuss
on list or raise bug?
... If it is not going to change there is really no bug. I want
to discuss that first.
MS: Ok. we need actionable bugs, this needs to be clear.
RS: I will post to the HTML WG and Ian for his thoughts.
DS: I think that filling bugs is a good idea, otherwise we may be asking the editor to do something prematurely.
RS: Do you want to talk to address this?
DS: We should discuss it first.
RS: What do people think about
using fragments as alternative types etc?
... I want to get peoples thoughts.
MS: It sounds like <canvas>
is moving along fine
... Dave can you give us a summary on <video>?
DS: We should start on the wiki, not a lot to report right now..but work on the wiki will be a good place to start.
MS: I'll put the URL into minutes later.
<kliehm> http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/HTML/wiki/Main_Page
MS: The first call focussed on
ARIA integration and getting the conformance criteria agreed
upon.
... So how much progress have we made? Steve?
SF: We are a standstill at the
moment.
... Same as where we were before Xmas
MS: What do people think we can do to move this forward?
SF: Do it piecemeal and file bugs as we go.
MS: Ok
... Any objections?
CS: I have a suggestion, could be work on it during this call?
MS: Yes
SF: Can we send a bug to the list, discuss at meeting and then it would be filed?
MS: Lets do that
SF: Bugs can be posted and brought in, discussed etc. Good way to get going.
MS: Good idea, we need to make this a priority. Lets do that.
SF: When we put a bug in that is
rejected, does it go into issue tracker? We don't want loads of
bugs but issues about ARIA that need to be addressed?
... So a bug that is rejected gets escalated to the issue
tracker.
MS: Yes, right.
CS: Are we still not deciding what the categories are?
SF: We can talk it
CS: The glaring issues etc
SF: Yes
MS: Ok, thats all on that.
<Laura> Bug Collection, Development, Status and Resolution: http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/HTML/wiki/Bugs
MS: These are the bugs that are
marked with the numeronym a11y
... Some resolved, fixed etc
... I will look at the ones that are not marked with task force
keywords
... In the interest of looking at the most recent..
<MikeSmithX> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8674
MS; [To all] Please look through the list, if you want to discuss on the call get in queue
MS: Hixie has rejected this one, and made a suggestion.
<discussion on <menu> and bug>
SF: I am confused about comment - breaking backwards compat?
MS: Yeah, me 2
... Do we want to add the task force keyword to this?
... Yes, no?
SF: Maybe Rich could answer this?
CS: Implementors I talk to will not want to base their APIs on nesting.
SF: Right
JS: The proposed solution may not be adequate
MS: I will add the keyword, if
new info comes along etc I will add to the bug
... Otherwise we will consider escalating.
CS: Henny can you talk to Opera?
HS: Yes
<Laura> Escalating a Bug to an Issue: http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/HTML/wiki/Bugs/Escalating_a_Bug_to_an_Issue
<MikeSmithX> ACTION: Cynthia to follow up with IE team about whether implementers are willing to use parent/child/nesting relationships could be used in mappings logic [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2010/01/07-html-a11y-minutes.html#action01]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-8 - Follow up with IE team about whether implementers are willing to use parent/child/nesting relationships could be used in mappings logic [on Cynthia Shelly - due 2010-01-14].
MS: I won't go thru all these now, does anyone have high priority bugs they want to talk about on this call?
<silence>
MS: What about 8671?
<MikeSmithX> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8671
MS: Making the @label
required?
... It is a significant change to the spec..
CS: Do we need a consensus on what we need to talk about?
<Zakim> Michael_Cooper, you wanted to volunteer to take an action item to make a proposal for which bugs we should take on, for review at next meeting
<MikeSmithX> ack
MC: I volunteer to take an action for the bugs we should track,
I'll take an action
<MikeSmithX> ACTION: Cooper to make a proposal for which bugs we should take on, for review at next meeting [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2010/01/07-html-a11y-minutes.html#action02]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-9 - Make a proposal for which bugs we should take on, for review at next meeting [on Michael Cooper - due 2010-01-14].
SF: Can we denote if we don't
want to discuss them
... There is a duplication maybe?
MS: Yes
MC: I can use bugzilla
DS: Comments would be best, to say this has or hasn't been discussed.
MC: We should remove the TF keyword..to reduce noise etc
MS: Yes, thats a good idea
... Anything else that needs attention?
DS: Gez has been entering a lot of bugs, I am concerned about say Media a11y issue, and single pixel issues but maybe we miss the big picture?
JOC: Good point David, I agree
MC: We can use bugzilla for various groupings and create relationships between bugs.
DS: There is a big picture that needs to be developed.
JS: What Gez is doing, started at TPAC. There may have been a misunderstanding as to how much work needed to be done, so we wanted to identify issues. Item by item and pixel by pixel may not be the best approach, but we just need to identify what needs to be worked on.
<dsinger> Ok
JS: Keywords would provide a working mechanism, to get them on the table as such.
MS: I spoke with MC and JS about
this, the chairs perspective is that they dont pay much
attention to the Priority levels etc.
... They have no significance..Hixie has changed some of the
bugs - the editors change them, others with access can change
them- not really an issue for the WG or the a11y TF.
Thoughts?
JS: Again, a misunderstanding. The advice would be to leave it at default.
MS: Yes
MS: We will talk about this next week.
MS: ?
... Ok, next meeting. Next week, same time.
... Volunteers for scribe next week?
SF: I'll try
<dsinger> Bye
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.135 of Date: 2009/03/02 03:52:20 Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00) Succeeded: s/his/this/ Succeeded: s/week/weeks/ Found Scribe: Joshue Inferring ScribeNick: Joshue WARNING: No "Present: ... " found! Possibly Present: Ben Ben_Caldwell CS Cynthia_Shelly DS Geoff_Freed HS Henny JOC JS Janina Jon_Gunderson Joshue Laura MC MS Marco_Ranon MichaelC Michael_Cooper Microsoft Mike MikeSmithX P32 P41 P43 P49 P51 RS Rich SF Stevef action-1 action-3 action-4 action-5 action-6 dsinger eric_carlson frankolivier gfreed html-a11y iheni inserted joined jongunderson kford kliehm mhakkinen paulc richardschwerdtfe trackbot You can indicate people for the Present list like this: <dbooth> Present: dbooth jonathan mary <dbooth> Present+ amy Regrets: Laura Stephane Aurélien Markku Wendy Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-a11y/2010Jan/0065.html Found Date: 07 Jan 2010 Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2010/01/07-html-a11y-minutes.html People with action items: cooper cynthia WARNING: Input appears to use implicit continuation lines. You may need the "-implicitContinuations" option.[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]