ISSUE-54: Do we need (descriptions of) property functions in SD? Is this in scope for us?

Do we need (descriptions of) property functions in SD? Is this in scope for us?

State:

CLOSED

Product:

Raised by:

Opened on:

2010-02-16

Description:

Related Actions Items:

No related actions

Related emails:

1. SPARQL WG Agenda Tuesday May 4, 2010 (from lee@thefigtrees.net on 2010-05-03)
2. Re: ISSUE-54: Do we need (descriptions of) property functions in SD? Is this in scope for us? (from steve.harris@garlik.com on 2010-03-07)
3. Re: ISSUE-54: Do we need (descriptions of) property functions in SD? Is this in scope for us? (from lee@thefigtrees.net on 2010-03-07)
4. Re: ISSUE-54: Do we need (descriptions of) property functions in SD? Is this in scope for us? (from andy.seaborne@talis.com on 2010-03-07)
5. Re: ISSUE-54: Do we need (descriptions of) property functions in SD? Is this in scope for us? (from andy.seaborne@talis.com on 2010-03-07)
6. Re: ISSUE-54: Do we need (descriptions of) property functions in SD? Is this in scope for us? (from greg@evilfunhouse.com on 2010-03-05)
7. Re: ISSUE-54: Do we need (descriptions of) property functions in SD? Is this in scope for us? (from andy.seaborne@talis.com on 2010-03-05)
8. Re: ISSUE-54: Do we need (descriptions of) property functions in SD? Is this in scope for us? (from lee@thefigtrees.net on 2010-03-04)
9. Re: ISSUE-54: Do we need (descriptions of) property functions in SD? Is this in scope for us? (from andy.seaborne@talis.com on 2010-03-04)
10. Re: ISSUE-54: Do we need (descriptions of) property functions in SD? Is this in scope for us? (from gearon@ieee.org on 2010-03-03)
11. Re: ISSUE-54: Do we need (descriptions of) property functions in SD? Is this in scope for us? (from greg@evilfunhouse.com on 2010-03-02)
12. Re: ISSUE-54: Do we need (descriptions of) property functions in SD? Is this in scope for us? (from andy.seaborne@talis.com on 2010-02-22)
13. Re: ISSUE-54: Do we need (descriptions of) property functions in SD? Is this in scope for us? (from greg@evilfunhouse.com on 2010-02-17)
14. Re: ISSUE-54: Do we need (descriptions of) property functions in SD? Is this in scope for us? (from lee@thefigtrees.net on 2010-02-17)
15. Re: ISSUE-54: Do we need (descriptions of) property functions in SD? Is this in scope for us? (from steve.harris@garlik.com on 2010-02-17)
16. Re: ISSUE-54: Do we need (descriptions of) property functions in SD? Is this in scope for us? (from gearon@ieee.org on 2010-02-17)
17. Re: ISSUE-54: Do we need (descriptions of) property functions in SD? Is this in scope for us? (from greg@evilfunhouse.com on 2010-02-16)
18. Re: ISSUE-54: Do we need (descriptions of) property functions in SD? Is this in scope for us? (from steve.harris@garlik.com on 2010-02-16)
19. Re: ISSUE-54: Do we need (descriptions of) property functions in SD? Is this in scope for us? (from lee@thefigtrees.net on 2010-02-16)
20. Re: ISSUE-54: Do we need (descriptions of) property functions in SD? Is this in scope for us? (from gearon@ieee.org on 2010-02-16)
21. ISSUE-54: Do we need (descriptions of) property functions in SD? Is this in scope for us? (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2010-02-16)

Related notes:

Display change log