ISSUE-14: Which aggregates to include

Which aggregates to include

State:
CLOSED
Product:
Raised by:
Opened on:
2009-05-07
Description:
Related Actions Items:
No related actions
Related emails:
  1. Re: issue round-up, part 1 (from lee@thefigtrees.net on 2010-05-18)
  2. Re: issue round-up, part 1 (from axel.polleres@deri.org on 2010-05-18)
  3. Re: issue round-up, part 1 (from axel.polleres@deri.org on 2010-05-18)
  4. Re: issue round-up, part 1 (from steve.harris@garlik.com on 2010-05-18)
  5. Re: issue round-up, part 1 (from lee@thefigtrees.net on 2010-05-17)
  6. Re: issue round-up, part 1 (from andy.seaborne@talis.com on 2010-05-17)
  7. issue round-up, part 1 (from lee@thefigtrees.net on 2010-05-16)
  8. Prioritised list of open issues (query, my bits) (from steve.harris@garlik.com on 2010-02-08)
  9. Summary of open issues on query. (from andy.seaborne@talis.com on 2010-02-03)
  10. just before we start... agenda now reflecting last TC's agreements (from axel.polleres@deri.org on 2009-11-02)

Related notes:

[LeeF]: we're talking about which aggregate functions to include in SPARQL/Query

7 May 2009, 14:57:13

[LeeF]: http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Design:Aggregate

29 Sep 2009, 03:20:40

[LeeF]: RESOLVED: Close ISSUE-14 with the consensus that SPARQL 1.1 defines the following aggregates: COUNT, SUM, MIN, MAX, AVG, GROUP_CONCAT, and SAMPLE

25 May 2010, 14:20:05

Display change log ATOM feed


Chair, Staff Contact
Tracker: documentation, (configuration for this group), originally developed by Dean Jackson, is developed and maintained by the Systems Team <w3t-sys@w3.org>.
$Id: 14.html,v 1.1 2013-03-28 18:39:06 brett Exp $