ISSUE-12: Presence and syntactic detail of HAVING clause

Presence and syntactic detail of HAVING clause

State:
CLOSED
Product:
Raised by:
David Charboneau
Opened on:
2009-05-07
Description:
Related Actions Items:
No related actions
Related emails:
  1. Re: RDF WG Resolution Regarding Various Forms of String Literals (from david@3roundstones.com on 2011-06-20)
  2. Re: RDF WG Resolution Regarding Various Forms of String Literals (from andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com on 2011-06-20)
  3. Re: RDF WG Resolution Regarding Various Forms of String Literals (from andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com on 2011-06-20)
  4. AW: RDF WG Resolution Regarding Various Forms of String Literals (from axel.polleres@deri.org on 2011-06-20)
  5. Re: RDF WG Resolution Regarding Various Forms of String Literals (from steve.harris@garlik.com on 2011-06-20)
  6. Re: RDF WG Resolution Regarding Various Forms of String Literals (from lee@thefigtrees.net on 2011-06-20)
  7. RDF WG Resolution Regarding Various Forms of String Literals (from david@3roundstones.com on 2011-06-15)
  8. Re: ISSUE-12 (HAVING vs FILTER) (from imikhailov@openlinksw.com on 2010-02-10)
  9. Re: ISSUE-12 (HAVING vs FILTER) (from axel.polleres@deri.org on 2010-02-09)
  10. ISSUE-12 (HAVING vs FILTER) (from andy.seaborne@talis.com on 2010-02-09)
  11. Re: Agenda SPARQL TC 2010-02-09 (from axel.polleres@deri.org on 2010-02-09)
  12. Re: Agenda SPARQL TC 2010-02-09 (from andy.seaborne@talis.com on 2010-02-09)
  13. Prioritised list of open issues (query, my bits) (from steve.harris@garlik.com on 2010-02-08)
  14. Summary of open issues on query. (from andy.seaborne@talis.com on 2010-02-03)
  15. Re: agenda for tomorrow... (from axel.polleres@deri.org on 2009-12-07)
  16. Re: agenda for tomorrow... now here's the agenda. (from axel.polleres@deri.org on 2009-12-07)
  17. Re: agenda for tomorrow... (from andy.seaborne@talis.com on 2009-12-07)
  18. Re: HAVING vs. FILTER (was: Re: Views on the outcomes of F2F) (from axel.polleres@deri.org on 2009-11-13)
  19. HAVING vs. FILTER (was: Re: Views on the outcomes of F2F) (from lee@thefigtrees.net on 2009-11-12)
  20. Re: Views on the outcomes of F2F (from gearon@ieee.org on 2009-11-10)
  21. Re: Views on the outcomes of F2F (from steve.harris@garlik.com on 2009-11-10)
  22. Re: Views on the outcomes of F2F (from gearon@ieee.org on 2009-11-10)
  23. Views on the outcomes of F2F (from andy.seaborne@talis.com on 2009-11-10)
  24. Checking in on our issues (from lee@thefigtrees.net on 2009-09-28)

Related notes:

[LeeF]: general consensus that we need equivalent of a HAVING clause

7 May 2009, 14:53:02

http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/meeting/2010-02-09#resolution_4

Axel Polleres, 9 Feb 2010, 16:49:34

Display change log ATOM feed


Chair, Staff Contact
Tracker: documentation, (configuration for this group), originally developed by Dean Jackson, is developed and maintained by the Systems Team <w3t-sys@w3.org>.
$Id: 12.html,v 1.1 2013-03-28 18:39:05 brett Exp $