13:32:36 <RRSAgent> logging to http://www.w3.org/2010/08/17-sparql-irc
RRSAgent IRC Bot: logging to http://www.w3.org/2010/08/17-sparql-irc ←
13:58:10 <AxelPolleres> trackbot, start meeting
(No events recorded for 25 minutes)
Axel Polleres: trackbot, start meeting ←
13:58:12 <trackbot> RRSAgent, make logs world
Trackbot IRC Bot: RRSAgent, make logs world ←
13:58:14 <trackbot> Zakim, this will be 77277
Trackbot IRC Bot: Zakim, this will be 77277 ←
13:58:14 <Zakim> ok, trackbot; I see SW_(SPARQL)10:00AM scheduled to start in 2 minutes
Zakim IRC Bot: ok, trackbot; I see SW_(SPARQL)10:00AM scheduled to start in 2 minutes ←
13:58:15 <trackbot> Meeting: SPARQL Working Group Teleconference
13:58:16 <trackbot> Date: 17 August 2010
13:59:20 <bglimm> Zakim, I am here. Why don't you get that?
Birte Glimm: Zakim, I am here. Why don't you get that? ←
13:59:21 <Zakim> I don't understand your question, bglimm.
Zakim IRC Bot: I don't understand your question, bglimm. ←
13:59:31 <kasei> heh
Gregory Williams: heh ←
14:00:02 <kasei> Zakim, who's here?
Gregory Williams: Zakim, who's here? ←
14:00:02 <Zakim> SW_(SPARQL)10:00AM has not yet started, kasei
Zakim IRC Bot: SW_(SPARQL)10:00AM has not yet started, kasei ←
14:00:03 <Zakim> On IRC I see MattPerry, SteveH, AlexPassant, NicoM, bglimm, OlivierCorby, Zakim, RRSAgent, AxelPolleres, LeeF, karl, kasei, pgearon, iv_an_ru, sandro, trackbot
Zakim IRC Bot: On IRC I see MattPerry, SteveH, AlexPassant, NicoM, bglimm, OlivierCorby, Zakim, RRSAgent, AxelPolleres, LeeF, karl, kasei, pgearon, iv_an_ru, sandro, trackbot ←
14:00:15 <AxelPolleres> Zakim, who is on the phone?
Axel Polleres: Zakim, who is on the phone? ←
14:00:15 <Zakim> SW_(SPARQL)10:00AM has not yet started, AxelPolleres
Zakim IRC Bot: SW_(SPARQL)10:00AM has not yet started, AxelPolleres ←
14:00:18 <Zakim> On IRC I see MattPerry, SteveH, AlexPassant, NicoM, bglimm, OlivierCorby, Zakim, RRSAgent, AxelPolleres, LeeF, karl, kasei, pgearon, iv_an_ru, sandro, trackbot
Zakim IRC Bot: On IRC I see MattPerry, SteveH, AlexPassant, NicoM, bglimm, OlivierCorby, Zakim, RRSAgent, AxelPolleres, LeeF, karl, kasei, pgearon, iv_an_ru, sandro, trackbot ←
14:00:19 <bglimm> What a crap. First Zakim does not recognize that I have called and not all circuits are busy!
Birte Glimm: What a crap. First Zakim does not recognize that I have called and not all circuits are busy! ←
14:00:30 <SteveH> bglimm, ah, I jsut beat you I guess
Steve Harris: bglimm, ah, I jsut beat you I guess ←
14:00:39 <bglimm> Sandro, Ivan, any chance that this will be fixed any time soon?
Birte Glimm: Sandro, Ivan, any chance that this will be fixed any time soon? ←
14:00:48 <AxelPolleres> Zakim, who is on the phone?
Axel Polleres: Zakim, who is on the phone? ←
14:00:48 <Zakim> SW_(SPARQL)10:00AM has not yet started, AxelPolleres
Zakim IRC Bot: SW_(SPARQL)10:00AM has not yet started, AxelPolleres ←
14:00:49 <Zakim> On IRC I see MattPerry, SteveH, AlexPassant, NicoM, bglimm, OlivierCorby, Zakim, RRSAgent, AxelPolleres, LeeF, karl, kasei, pgearon, iv_an_ru, sandro, trackbot
Zakim IRC Bot: On IRC I see MattPerry, SteveH, AlexPassant, NicoM, bglimm, OlivierCorby, Zakim, RRSAgent, AxelPolleres, LeeF, karl, kasei, pgearon, iv_an_ru, sandro, trackbot ←
14:01:00 <AxelPolleres> Zakim, this is SPARQL
Axel Polleres: Zakim, this is SPARQL ←
14:01:00 <Zakim> ok, AxelPolleres; that matches SW_(SPARQL)10:00AM
Zakim IRC Bot: ok, AxelPolleres; that matches SW_(SPARQL)10:00AM ←
14:01:11 <AxelPolleres> Zakim, who is on the phone?
Axel Polleres: Zakim, who is on the phone? ←
14:01:11 <Zakim> On the phone I see kasei, AxelPolleres, +44.208.439.aacc, +49.911.973.4.aadd, +33.4.92.38.aaee
Zakim IRC Bot: On the phone I see kasei, AxelPolleres, +44.208.439.aacc, +49.911.973.4.aadd, +33.4.92.38.aaee ←
14:01:28 <SteveH> Zakim, aacc is [Garlik]
Steve Harris: Zakim, aacc is [Garlik] ←
14:01:29 <Zakim> +[Garlik]; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +[Garlik]; got it ←
14:01:33 <Zakim> + +44.186.528.aaff
Zakim IRC Bot: + +44.186.528.aaff ←
14:01:36 <bglimm> Yes, SteveH, but I dialed in twice before and Zakim just did not recognise that
Birte Glimm: Yes, SteveH, but I dialed in twice before and Zakim just did not recognise that ←
14:01:38 <SteveH> Zakim, [Garlik] is temporarily me
Steve Harris: Zakim, [Garlik] is temporarily me ←
14:01:38 <Zakim> +SteveH; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +SteveH; got it ←
14:01:43 <OlivierCorby> Zakim, aaee is me
Olivier Corby: Zakim, aaee is me ←
14:01:43 <Zakim> +OlivierCorby; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +OlivierCorby; got it ←
14:01:44 <Zakim> + +1.603.897.aagg
Zakim IRC Bot: + +1.603.897.aagg ←
14:01:45 <bglimm> Zakim, +44.186.528.aaff is me
Birte Glimm: Zakim, +44.186.528.aaff is me ←
14:01:46 <Zakim> +bglimm; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +bglimm; got it ←
14:01:51 <Zakim> + +1.603.897.aahh
Zakim IRC Bot: + +1.603.897.aahh ←
14:01:54 <bglimm> now calling via France
Birte Glimm: now calling via France ←
14:01:55 <MattPerry> zakim, aagg is me
Matthew Perry: zakim, aagg is me ←
14:01:55 <Zakim> +MattPerry; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +MattPerry; got it ←
14:01:55 <AxelPolleres> Zakim, who is on the phone?
Axel Polleres: Zakim, who is on the phone? ←
14:01:58 <Zakim> On the phone I see kasei, AxelPolleres, SteveH, +49.911.973.4.aadd, OlivierCorby, bglimm, MattPerry, +1.603.897.aahh
Zakim IRC Bot: On the phone I see kasei, AxelPolleres, SteveH, +49.911.973.4.aadd, OlivierCorby, bglimm, MattPerry, +1.603.897.aahh ←
14:02:01 <Souri> zakim, aahh is me
Souripriya Das: zakim, aahh is me ←
14:02:03 <Zakim> +Souri; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +Souri; got it ←
14:02:03 <NicoM> Zakim, +49.9 is me
Nico Michaelis: Zakim, +49.9 is me ←
14:02:05 <Zakim> +NicoM; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +NicoM; got it ←
14:02:09 <SteveH> bglimm, are you us�ing the London number? the other one doesn't work at all, as far as I can see
Steve Harris: bglimm, are you us�ing the London number? the other one doesn't work at all, as far as I can see ←
14:02:23 <AxelPolleres> scribe: OlivierCorby
(Scribe set to Olivier Corby)
14:02:27 <bglimm> +44.203.318.0479 that's what I use
Birte Glimm: +44.203.318.0479 that's what I use ←
14:02:33 <bglimm> As in the agenda
Birte Glimm: As in the agenda ←
14:02:35 <AxelPolleres> agenda: http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Agenda-2010-08-17
14:02:49 <SteveH> bglimm, yeah. that's the one I connected on
Steve Harris: bglimm, yeah. that's the one I connected on ←
14:02:53 <kasei> Zakim, who is talking?
Gregory Williams: Zakim, who is talking? ←
14:03:00 <kasei> very loud
Gregory Williams: very loud ←
14:03:00 <bglimm> Zakim, mute me
Birte Glimm: Zakim, mute me ←
14:03:00 <Zakim> bglimm should now be muted
Zakim IRC Bot: bglimm should now be muted ←
14:03:01 <AxelPolleres> regrets: Nicholas Humfrey, AndyS
14:03:04 <Zakim> kasei, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: AxelPolleres (33%), bglimm (50%)
Zakim IRC Bot: kasei, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: AxelPolleres (33%), bglimm (50%) ←
14:03:19 <bglimm> I just muted, I think I have a noisy line
Birte Glimm: I just muted, I think I have a noisy line ←
14:04:31 <Zakim> +Sandro
Zakim IRC Bot: +Sandro ←
14:04:42 <Zakim> +Chimezie_Ogbuji
Zakim IRC Bot: +Chimezie_Ogbuji ←
14:04:44 <AxelPolleres> PROPOSED: Approve minutes at http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/meeting/2010-08-10
PROPOSED: Approve minutes at http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/meeting/2010-08-10 ←
14:05:13 <Zakim> +pgearon
Zakim IRC Bot: +pgearon ←
14:05:16 <AxelPolleres> RESOLVED: Approve minutes at http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/meeting/2010-08-10
RESOLVED: Approve minutes at http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/meeting/2010-08-10 ←
14:05:40 <AxelPolleres> topic: comment by TBL
14:05:44 <Zakim> + +1.617.245.aaii
Zakim IRC Bot: + +1.617.245.aaii ←
14:05:49 <AxelPolleres> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2010Aug/0004.html
Axel Polleres: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2010Aug/0004.html ←
14:05:51 <Zakim> +??P34
Zakim IRC Bot: +??P34 ←
14:05:53 <AlexPassant> Zakim, ??P34 is me
Alexandre Passant: Zakim, ??P34 is me ←
14:05:53 <Zakim> +AlexPassant; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +AlexPassant; got it ←
14:06:30 <AxelPolleres> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2010JulSep/0227.html
Axel Polleres: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2010JulSep/0227.html ←
14:07:31 <OlivierCorby> 1st point about linked data
1st point about linked data ←
14:07:51 <LeeF> Should we take these one at a time for group discussion?
Lee Feigenbaum: Should we take these one at a time for group discussion? ←
14:08:21 <AxelPolleres> lee, yup, let'chime summarise first
Axel Polleres: lee, yup, let'chime summarise first ←
14:09:59 <LeeF> k
Lee Feigenbaum: k ←
14:10:27 <AxelPolleres> 1) One point is that, mostly, this is a book about how to implement a
Axel Polleres: 1) One point is that, mostly, this is a book about how to implement a ←
14:10:27 <AxelPolleres> linked data when you have an existing SPARQL server. This is clearly a good idea..
Axel Polleres: linked data when you have an existing SPARQL server. This is clearly a good idea.. ←
14:10:27 <AxelPolleres> That could be expressed in the abstract.
Axel Polleres: That could be expressed in the abstract. ←
14:11:42 <AxelPolleres> Chime: how can we refere to LinkedData /design issues doc... since it's not a spec
Chimezie Ogbuji: how can we refere to LinkedData /design issues doc... since it's not a spec [ Scribe Assist by Axel Polleres ] ←
14:11:57 <OlivierCorby> Relevance of linked data wrt to this doc ?
Relevance of linked data wrt to this doc ? ←
14:12:14 <LeeF> I don't personsally share Tim's view, but I also don't have any objections to this view (so yeah, I agree with Chime and Axel)
Lee Feigenbaum: I don't personsally share Tim's view, but I also don't have any objections to this view (so yeah, I agree with Chime and Axel) ←
14:12:51 <LeeF> I view it as a lightweight, higly portable way to work with RDF data, that's it
Lee Feigenbaum: I view it as a lightweight, higly portable way to work with RDF data, that's it ←
14:12:58 <LeeF> s/higly/highly
Lee Feigenbaum: s/higly/highly ←
14:13:26 <AxelPolleres> ACTION: chime to add a statement reflecting TL-1 point 1) in the http-rdf-update
ACTION: chime to add a statement reflecting TL-1 point 1) in the http-rdf-update ←
14:13:26 <trackbot> Created ACTION-294 - Add a statement reflecting TL-1 point 1) in the http-rdf-update [on Chimezie Ogbuji - due 2010-08-24].
Trackbot IRC Bot: Created ACTION-294 - Add a statement reflecting TL-1 point 1) in the http-rdf-update [on Chimezie Ogbuji - due 2010-08-24]. ←
14:13:49 <LeeF> (BTW, my regrets next week - on vacation)
Lee Feigenbaum: (BTW, my regrets next week - on vacation) ←
14:14:27 <OlivierCorby> 2. direct vs indirect graph manipulation
2. direct vs indirect graph manipulation ←
14:14:49 <AxelPolleres> "I would prefer 4.2 be couched as "Graph Mirroring". This echoes the way many web sites
Axel Polleres: "I would prefer 4.2 be couched as "Graph Mirroring". This echoes the way many web sites ←
14:14:49 <AxelPolleres> (and FTP sites) mirror another's contents, and may even provide enhanced access, while not being authoritative.
Axel Polleres: (and FTP sites) mirror another's contents, and may even provide enhanced access, while not being authoritative. ←
14:14:49 <AxelPolleres> "
Axel Polleres: " ←
14:15:59 <AxelPolleres> Axel: Graph Mirroring is a use case, but not the only one, we should make that clear in the response.
Axel Polleres: Graph Mirroring is a use case, but not the only one, we should make that clear in the response. [ Scribe Assist by Axel Polleres ] ←
14:16:29 <AxelPolleres> Chime: hostname/authority was maybe not clear, maybe just needs some rewording
Chimezie Ogbuji: hostname/authority was maybe not clear, maybe just needs some rewording [ Scribe Assist by Axel Polleres ] ←
14:16:30 <chimezie> ".. it is often the case (with HTTP graph URIs in particular) that the server associated with the hostname is not the same as the server managing the identified RDF knowledge (as a result of a change in domain name ownership, for instance), the host server is not available, or the URI is not dereferencable"
Chimezie Ogbuji: ".. it is often the case (with HTTP graph URIs in particular) that the server associated with the hostname is not the same as the server managing the identified RDF knowledge (as a result of a change in domain name ownership, for instance), the host server is not available, or the URI is not dereferencable" ←
14:17:58 <AxelPolleres> Chime: general tenor of the mail, is that Tim unerstand the whole document as one use case we have in mind.
Chimezie Ogbuji: general tenor of the mail, is that Tim unerstand the whole document as one use case we have in mind. [ Scribe Assist by Axel Polleres ] ←
14:18:27 <AxelPolleres> sandro: maybe easier, if we respond and try to find some concrete suggestions we can take on board.
Sandro Hawke: maybe easier, if we respond and try to find some concrete suggestions we can take on board. [ Scribe Assist by Axel Polleres ] ←
14:19:13 <AxelPolleres> "I'd note that it may be useful to have a way of saying that. A simple P label could do."
Axel Polleres: "I'd note that it may be useful to have a way of saying that. A simple P label could do." ←
14:19:42 <AxelPolleres> this sentence not really understandable, maybe ask for clarification.
Axel Polleres: this sentence not really understandable, maybe ask for clarification. ←
14:20:21 <AxelPolleres> "so instead of
Axel Polleres: "so instead of ←
14:20:21 <AxelPolleres> http://example.com/rdf-graphs/employees?graph=http%3A//www.example.org/other/graph
Axel Polleres: http://example.com/rdf-graphs/employees?graph=http%3A//www.example.org/other/graph ←
14:20:22 <AxelPolleres> why not
Axel Polleres: why not ←
14:20:22 <AxelPolleres> http://example.com/rdf-graphs/www.example.org/other/graph
Axel Polleres: http://example.com/rdf-graphs/www.example.org/other/graph ←
14:20:22 <AxelPolleres> or
Axel Polleres: or ←
14:20:22 <AxelPolleres> http://example.com/rdf-graphs/employees/other/graph
Axel Polleres: http://example.com/rdf-graphs/employees/other/graph ←
14:20:24 <AxelPolleres> "
Axel Polleres: " ←
14:20:36 <SteveH> we need the http/https/urn scheme in there I think
Steve Harris: we need the http/https/urn scheme in there I think ←
14:21:06 <AxelPolleres> Should we mention both alternatives? I.e. explicityle ecourage masking
Axel Polleres: Should we mention both alternatives? I.e. explicityle ecourage masking ←
14:21:06 <AxelPolleres> the "?" URIs and adding a section that explains why that might be
Axel Polleres: the "?" URIs and adding a section that explains why that might be ←
14:21:07 <AxelPolleres> useful?
Axel Polleres: useful? ←
14:21:21 <pgearon> I'd like to see ? as an option
Paul Gearon: I'd like to see ? as an option ←
14:21:38 <kasei> +1 pgearon
Gregory Williams: +1 pgearon ←
14:21:46 <SteveH> yeah
Steve Harris: yeah ←
14:21:47 <AxelPolleres> tim wrote: "A rewrite rule on the server can of course turn this into the "?" form internally and the CGI apparatus fired up as a result."
Axel Polleres: tim wrote: "A rewrite rule on the server can of course turn this into the "?" form internally and the CGI apparatus fired up as a result." ←
14:22:28 <pgearon> Many implementations are servlet based, and ? is much easier there
Paul Gearon: Many implementations are servlet based, and ? is much easier there ←
14:22:29 <SteveH> rewrite rules aren't that bothered about ?s
Steve Harris: rewrite rules aren't that bothered about ?s ←
14:22:43 <SteveH> pgearon, really? even with PUT?
Steve Harris: pgearon, really? even with PUT? ←
14:22:50 <NicoM> for non static graphs, having proxies not cache anything may be a good thing
Nico Michaelis: for non static graphs, having proxies not cache anything may be a good thing ←
14:23:11 <LeeF> are proxies that don't cache ? URIs behaving as per spec or are they being naughty?
Lee Feigenbaum: are proxies that don't cache ? URIs behaving as per spec or are they being naughty? ←
14:23:16 <AxelPolleres> Axel: Should we explicitly mention the rewrite option in the doc?
Axel Polleres: Should we explicitly mention the rewrite option in the doc? [ Scribe Assist by Axel Polleres ] ←
14:23:18 <pgearon> SteveH: for me, sure. I'd expect that JS based implementations would prefer ? as well
Steve Harris: for me, sure. I'd expect that JS based implementations would prefer ? as well [ Scribe Assist by Paul Gearon ] ←
14:23:26 <AxelPolleres> Chime: wouldn't hurt, can think aobut some text.
Chimezie Ogbuji: wouldn't hurt, can think aobut some text. [ Scribe Assist by Axel Polleres ] ←
14:23:37 <SteveH> pgearon, not really, you have to write your own parser either way
Steve Harris: pgearon, not really, you have to write your own parser either way ←
14:25:03 <AxelPolleres> points 4) 5) ...
Axel Polleres: points 4) 5) ... ←
14:25:56 <AxelPolleres> chime: maybe we should ask back for clarification whether there's specific text he had in mind.
Chimezie Ogbuji: maybe we should ask back for clarification whether there's specific text he had in mind. [ Scribe Assist by Axel Polleres ] ←
14:26:05 <AxelPolleres> sandro: quicker if we propose text
Sandro Hawke: quicker if we propose text [ Scribe Assist by Axel Polleres ] ←
14:26:09 <AxelPolleres> chime: ok
Chimezie Ogbuji: ok [ Scribe Assist by Axel Polleres ] ←
14:27:31 <AxelPolleres> "...that THE DEFAULT GRAPH OF THE QUERY IS THE ONE IN THE HTTP REQUEST.
Axel Polleres: "...that THE DEFAULT GRAPH OF THE QUERY IS THE ONE IN THE HTTP REQUEST. ←
14:27:31 <AxelPolleres> Obvious really, but people can miss it."
Axel Polleres: Obvious really, but people can miss it." ←
14:28:52 <AxelPolleres> chime: last TC we need to clarify protocol interaction in general. we can put that in the response
Chimezie Ogbuji: last TC we need to clarify protocol interaction in general. we can put that in the response [ Scribe Assist by Axel Polleres ] ←
14:29:00 <AxelPolleres> ... ongoing issue
Axel Polleres: ... ongoing issue ←
14:29:37 <AxelPolleres> Axel: last point 6) on MS-Author-Via header
Axel Polleres: last point 6) on MS-Author-Via header [ Scribe Assist by Axel Polleres ] ←
14:29:57 <AxelPolleres> Chime: some idea, but not sure what he had in mind
Chimezie Ogbuji: some idea, but not sure what he had in mind [ Scribe Assist by Axel Polleres ] ←
14:30:06 <AxelPolleres> ... ask back for clarification.
Axel Polleres: ... ask back for clarification. ←
14:30:36 <AxelPolleres> ACTION: Chime to draft response for TL-1
ACTION: Chime to draft response for TL-1 ←
14:30:36 <trackbot> Created ACTION-295 - Draft response for TL-1 [on Chimezie Ogbuji - due 2010-08-24].
Trackbot IRC Bot: Created ACTION-295 - Draft response for TL-1 [on Chimezie Ogbuji - due 2010-08-24]. ←
14:31:44 <Zakim> - +1.617.245.aaii
Zakim IRC Bot: - +1.617.245.aaii ←
14:31:53 <AxelPolleres> topic: issues to be postponed
14:32:58 <AxelPolleres> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/issues
Axel Polleres: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/issues ←
14:34:06 <SteveH> yes, it was stuff that was left over
Steve Harris: yes, it was stuff that was left over ←
14:34:10 <SteveH> we did it by hand IIRC
Steve Harris: we did it by hand IIRC ←
14:34:16 <SteveH> by we, I mean other people :)
Steve Harris: by we, I mean other people :) ←
14:34:26 <chimezie> Zakim, mute me
Chimezie Ogbuji: Zakim, mute me ←
14:34:26 <Zakim> Chimezie_Ogbuji should now be muted
Zakim IRC Bot: Chimezie_Ogbuji should now be muted ←
14:35:14 <Zakim> +Lee_Feigenbaum
Zakim IRC Bot: +Lee_Feigenbaum ←
14:35:24 <AxelPolleres> "alternative limit per resource" http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2010JulSep/0194.html
Axel Polleres: "alternative limit per resource" http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2010JulSep/0194.html ←
14:35:28 <LeeF> the issues list was very much done by hand
Lee Feigenbaum: the issues list was very much done by hand ←
14:35:38 <LeeF> zakim, huh?
Lee Feigenbaum: zakim, huh? ←
14:35:38 <Zakim> I don't understand your question, LeeF.
Zakim IRC Bot: I don't understand your question, LeeF. ←
14:35:43 <LeeF> the issues list was very much done by hand
Lee Feigenbaum: the issues list was very much done by hand ←
14:36:47 <pgearon> +1 for not touching it right now
Paul Gearon: +1 for not touching it right now ←
14:36:51 <AxelPolleres> ISSUE: Treatment of "alternative limit per resource" http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2010JulSep/0194.html
ISSUE: Treatment of "alternative limit per resource" http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2010JulSep/0194.html ←
14:36:51 <trackbot> Created ISSUE-61 - Treatment of "alternative limit per resource" http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2010JulSep/0194.html ; please complete additional details at http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/track/issues/61/edit .
Trackbot IRC Bot: Created ISSUE-61 - Treatment of "alternative limit per resource" http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2010JulSep/0194.html ; please complete additional details at http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/track/issues/61/edit . ←
14:37:29 <AxelPolleres> query syntax for algebra operators http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2010JulSep/0193.html
Axel Polleres: query syntax for algebra operators http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2010JulSep/0193.html ←
14:38:12 <AxelPolleres> ISSUE: shall there be more concise query syntax for all algebra operators http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2010JulSep/0193.html
ISSUE: shall there be more concise query syntax for all algebra operators http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2010JulSep/0193.html ←
14:38:12 <trackbot> Created ISSUE-62 - Shall there be more concise query syntax for all algebra operators http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2010JulSep/0193.html ; please complete additional details at http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/track/issues/62/edit .
Trackbot IRC Bot: Created ISSUE-62 - Shall there be more concise query syntax for all algebra operators http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2010JulSep/0193.html ; please complete additional details at http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/track/issues/62/edit . ←
14:38:52 <AxelPolleres> axel: ISSUE-62 related to the open issue around assignment.
Axel Polleres: ISSUE-62 related to the open issue around assignment. [ Scribe Assist by Axel Polleres ] ←
14:39:55 <SteveH> why are these being created as ISSUES?!
Steve Harris: why are these being created as ISSUES?! ←
14:41:14 <pgearon> SteveH, perhaps AxelPolleres means that it's a known limitation of the language?
Paul Gearon: SteveH, perhaps AxelPolleres means that it's a known limitation of the language? ←
14:42:29 <AxelPolleres> PROPOSED: close ISSUE-61 with the understanding that we leave treatment of such queries for a coming WG
PROPOSED: close ISSUE-61 with the understanding that we leave treatment of such queries for a coming WG ←
14:44:49 <AxelPolleres> PROPOSED: close ISSUE-61 and ISSUE-62 with the understanding that this is out of scope of the current WG
PROPOSED: close ISSUE-61 and ISSUE-62 with the understanding that this is out of scope of the current WG ←
14:45:01 <AxelPolleres> close ISSUE-61
Axel Polleres: close ISSUE-61 ←
14:45:01 <trackbot> ISSUE-61 Treatment of "alternative limit per resource" http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2010JulSep/0194.html closed
Trackbot IRC Bot: ISSUE-61 Treatment of "alternative limit per resource" http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2010JulSep/0194.html closed ←
14:45:10 <AxelPolleres> close ISSUE-62
Axel Polleres: close ISSUE-62 ←
14:45:10 <trackbot> ISSUE-62 Shall there be more concise query syntax for all algebra operators http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2010JulSep/0193.html closed
Trackbot IRC Bot: ISSUE-62 Shall there be more concise query syntax for all algebra operators http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2010JulSep/0193.html closed ←
14:45:41 <pgearon> +q
Paul Gearon: +q ←
14:45:49 <pgearon> q-
Paul Gearon: q- ←
14:46:49 <AxelPolleres> Axel: so, postponed issue will only be those which we really can't close.
Axel Polleres: so, postponed issue will only be those which we really can't close. [ Scribe Assist by Axel Polleres ] ←
14:47:02 <AxelPolleres> .... this way we don't put any burden to a future WG.
Axel Polleres: .... this way we don't put any burden to a future WG. ←
14:47:53 <AxelPolleres> topic: mark SPARQL update member submission
14:49:29 <AxelPolleres> Axel: sandro, can we add a disclaimer on the member submission?
Axel Polleres: sandro, can we add a disclaimer on the member submission? [ Scribe Assist by Axel Polleres ] ←
14:49:53 <AxelPolleres> Sandro: as long as we check with submitters, and find sensible wording, that should be fine.
Sandro Hawke: as long as we check with submitters, and find sensible wording, that should be fine. [ Scribe Assist by Axel Polleres ] ←
14:50:33 <AxelPolleres> Axel: What we're looking for is a text similar to the OWL1 docs...
Axel Polleres: What we're looking for is a text similar to the OWL1 docs... [ Scribe Assist by Axel Polleres ] ←
14:51:02 <AlexPassant> I wrote a simple proposal on the list
Alexandre Passant: I wrote a simple proposal on the list ←
14:51:42 <AlexPassant> just need to s/Wroking Draft/REC when we switch to rec.
Alexandre Passant: just need to s/Wroking Draft/REC when we switch to rec. ←
14:51:43 <AxelPolleres> Sandro: Alex' wording needs to be updates, that would be a problem
Sandro Hawke: Alex' wording needs to be updates, that would be a problem [ Scribe Assist by Axel Polleres ] ←
14:51:49 <AlexPassant> but I'm open to other proposals
Alexandre Passant: but I'm open to other proposals ←
14:52:13 <AxelPolleres> ACITON SteveH to suggest a wording for a disclaimer text for the SPARQL update member submission
Axel Polleres: ACITON SteveH to suggest a wording for a disclaimer text for the SPARQL update member submission ←
14:52:27 <AxelPolleres> ACTION: member:SteveH to suggest a wording for a disclaimer text for the SPARQL update member submission
ACTION: member:SteveH to suggest a wording for a disclaimer text for the SPARQL update member submission ←
14:52:27 <trackbot> Sorry, bad ACTION syntax
Trackbot IRC Bot: Sorry, bad ACTION syntax ←
14:52:45 <AxelPolleres> ACTION: steveH to suggest a wording for a disclaimer text for the SPARQL update member submission
ACTION: steveH to suggest a wording for a disclaimer text for the SPARQL update member submission ←
14:52:45 <trackbot> Created ACTION-296 - to suggest a wording for a disclaimer text for the SPARQL update member submission [on Steve Harris - due 2010-08-24].
Trackbot IRC Bot: Created ACTION-296 - to suggest a wording for a disclaimer text for the SPARQL update member submission [on Steve Harris - due 2010-08-24]. ←
14:52:52 <AxelPolleres> topic: AOB?
14:53:04 <Zakim> -Chimezie_Ogbuji
Zakim IRC Bot: -Chimezie_Ogbuji ←
14:53:05 <Zakim> -Lee_Feigenbaum
Zakim IRC Bot: -Lee_Feigenbaum ←
14:53:06 <Zakim> -bglimm
Zakim IRC Bot: -bglimm ←
14:53:06 <Zakim> -MattPerry
Zakim IRC Bot: -MattPerry ←
14:53:08 <Zakim> -AlexPassant
Zakim IRC Bot: -AlexPassant ←
14:53:09 <Zakim> -Sandro
Zakim IRC Bot: -Sandro ←
14:53:10 <Zakim> -SteveH
Zakim IRC Bot: -SteveH ←
14:53:10 <Zakim> -AxelPolleres
Zakim IRC Bot: -AxelPolleres ←
14:53:12 <Zakim> -kasei
Zakim IRC Bot: -kasei ←
14:53:13 <AxelPolleres> hearing none, adjourned
Axel Polleres: hearing none, adjourned ←
14:53:13 <Zakim> -OlivierCorby
Zakim IRC Bot: -OlivierCorby ←
14:53:24 <Zakim> -pgearon
Zakim IRC Bot: -pgearon ←
14:53:27 <Zakim> -NicoM
Zakim IRC Bot: -NicoM ←
14:53:37 <AxelPolleres> rrsagent, make records public
Axel Polleres: rrsagent, make records public ←
14:54:12 <Zakim> -Souri
Zakim IRC Bot: -Souri ←
14:54:14 <Zakim> SW_(SPARQL)10:00AM has ended
Zakim IRC Bot: SW_(SPARQL)10:00AM has ended ←
14:54:16 <Zakim> Attendees were +44.186.528.aaaa, kasei, +44.186.528.aabb, AxelPolleres, +44.208.439.aacc, +49.911.973.4.aadd, +33.4.92.38.aaee, SteveH, OlivierCorby, +1.603.897.aagg, bglimm,
Zakim IRC Bot: Attendees were +44.186.528.aaaa, kasei, +44.186.528.aabb, AxelPolleres, +44.208.439.aacc, +49.911.973.4.aadd, +33.4.92.38.aaee, SteveH, OlivierCorby, +1.603.897.aagg, bglimm, ←
14:54:19 <Zakim> ... +1.603.897.aahh, MattPerry, Souri, NicoM, Sandro, Chimezie_Ogbuji, pgearon, +1.617.245.aaii, AlexPassant, Lee_Feigenbaum
Zakim IRC Bot: ... +1.603.897.aahh, MattPerry, Souri, NicoM, Sandro, Chimezie_Ogbuji, pgearon, +1.617.245.aaii, AlexPassant, Lee_Feigenbaum ←
Formatted by CommonScribe
This revision (#1) generated 2010-08-23 18:10:34 UTC by 'apollere2', comments: None