W3C

- DRAFT -

Semantic Sensor Network Incubator Group Teleconference

22 Dec 2009

See also: IRC log

Attendees

Present
Holger, +1.206.662.aaaa, Arthur, krzysztof_j, michael, Manfred_DERI, kerry, +1.650.450.aadd
Regrets
Kevin, Oscar, Payam, Simon
Chair
Holger
Scribe
krzysztof_j

Contents


 

 

<trackbot> Date: 22 December 2009

<laurent_oz> Laurent just joined

<Holger> ScribeNick: krzysztof_j

<michael> I said my bit on the mailing list

kerry: use cases should overlap, structuring into modules may not be helpful

<laurent_oz> -1

<laurent_oz> +1

<Manfred_DERI> -1

<Holger> -1

<michael> -1

<kerry> -1

<Bermudez_Luis> -1

<scribe> ACTION: close module issue [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/12/22-ssn-minutes.html#action01]

<trackbot> Sorry, couldn't find user - close

<scribe> ACTION: laurent_oz to close module issue [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/12/22-ssn-minutes.html#action02]

<trackbot> Sorry, couldn't find user - laurent_oz

<Holger> http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/XGR/

kerry: extension for incubator group may be difficult to get

<scribe> ACTION: all to contribute to the (final) report [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/12/22-ssn-minutes.html#action03]

<trackbot> Sorry, couldn't find user - all

<Manfred_DERI> +q

manfred: could we define an outline and propose names

holger: check the reports at http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/XGR/ for inspiration
... next topic --> discussion on the basic concepts of the O&M ontology

<kerry> +q

michael reports on O&M ontology

<laurent_oz> +q

<michael> no can't hear you

<laurent_oz> Two meanings for sensor (cleared in email thread), process (cleared in email thread), and device (generic product vs. instrument)

+q

<michael> my sound keeps dropping out - anyone else???

<Manfred_DERI> sound quality is bad but no dropouts here

<laurent_oz> Terms I use are defined here: http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/ssn/wiki/SWE_terms

<Bermudez_Luis> +q

<Holger> my sound's fine

manfred: same for me

<Danh_DERI> same from my side

<kerry> i can't hear well enough

luis: vote on "systems and processes are not connected (in the ontology)"

<michael> +q

options

(1) Process <= System

<Manfred_DERI> +q

(2) System <= Process

(3) state nothing

(4) Process disjoing System

manfred: go for (3) for the moment

<Danh_DERI> +1 for (3)

<Holger> http://etherpad.com/zyMhasUHgf

holger: who agrees on (3)?

<Bermudez_Luis> +1

kerry: option 3 for the moment or as stable solution

<Holger> +1

<michael> +1

<Manfred_DERI> +1

<Arthur> +1

<kerry> +1

<david> +1

+1

<laurent_oz> +1 for (3)

<laurent_oz> Has anyone noticed my ideas on core ontology vs. presentation ontology? Can we do (4) in the core and keep (3) for the presentation ontology

<michael> +q

<Manfred_DERI> +q

=q

<Bermudez_Luis> +q

michael: human sensors = observers

=q

<Manfred_DERI> -q

<kerry> +q

<laurent_oz> Manfred question: do we need obsever?

manfred: sensing is a process and a sensor implements the process

<Manfred_DERI> +q

<Bermudez_Luis> +q

<kerry> -q

MAnfred: what is a AdHocObserver?

<michael> +q

<Danh_DERI> +q

<michael> +q

<kerry> i can'thear danh

<Bermudez_Luis> +q

<michael> +q

<Manfred_DERI> I am sorry, but I will have to drop out in 10min the latest

<Manfred_DERI> +q

michael: rename the class names ( we have too much connotations for the *terms/labels*)

holger: do we agree on the structure?

me: difficult to answer

<michael> +q

<kerry> +q

but then we need short definitions (at the moment these issues are distributed over many mails, maybe use the wiki for it?)

<Bermudez_Luis> +q

<Manfred_DERI> good idea

<michael> I think I'd try to remove Observer

<laurent_oz> +1 on having textual definitions *every time*

<michael> too many people had problems with it - I'll try to think of a better word

<Bermudez_Luis> simple stucture and definitions

<Manfred_DERI> +1

<michael> +1

<kerry> +1

<Danh_DERI> +

<kerry> next meeting!?

<Manfred_DERI> Merry X-mas to everyone!!

<Manfred_DERI> AN a Happy New Year!

<Danh_DERI> merry X-mas and happy new year

bye

<michael> Merry Cristmas ... ho ho ho

<laurent_oz> http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/ssn/wiki/Review_of_semantic_annotation_proposals

<kerry> and have a great holiday!

<kerry> bye

Summary of Action Items

[NEW] ACTION: all to contribute to the (final) report [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/12/22-ssn-minutes.html#action03]
[NEW] ACTION: close module issue [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/12/22-ssn-minutes.html#action01]
[NEW] ACTION: laurent_oz to close module issue [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/12/22-ssn-minutes.html#action02]
 
[End of minutes]

Minutes formatted by David Booth's scribe.perl version 1.135 (CVS log)
$Date: 2009/12/22 21:21:21 $

Scribe.perl diagnostic output

[Delete this section before finalizing the minutes.]
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.135  of Date: 2009/03/02 03:52:20  
Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/

Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00)

Found ScribeNick: krzysztof_j
Inferring Scribes: krzysztof_j

WARNING: No "Topic:" lines found.

Default Present: Holger, +1.206.662.aaaa, Arthur, krzysztof_j, michael, Manfred_DERI, kerry, +1.650.450.aadd
Present: Holger +1.206.662.aaaa Arthur krzysztof_j michael Manfred_DERI kerry +1.650.450.aadd
Regrets: Kevin Oscar Payam Simon
Found Date: 22 Dec 2009
Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2009/12/22-ssn-minutes.html
People with action items: all close laurent_oz

WARNING: Input appears to use implicit continuation lines.
You may need the "-implicitContinuations" option.


WARNING: No "Topic: ..." lines found!  
Resulting HTML may have an empty (invalid) <ol>...</ol>.

Explanation: "Topic: ..." lines are used to indicate the start of 
new discussion topics or agenda items, such as:
<dbooth> Topic: Review of Amy's report


[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]