MW4D IG Call

 

 

<MiraS> +Mira

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-mw4d/2009Oct/0020.html

<kiwanja> hey steph - keep getting kicked out of the conference call. will keep trying...

<kiwanja> put in the 6493# and it hangs up. :(

ken, what is the problem ?

<kiwanja> get kicked out after entering the code. just hangs up on me....

<kiwanja> will keep trying

using the uk number ?

<kiwanja> yeah

<kiwanja> will try mobile. been using skype

http://www.w3.org/2008/MW4D/docs/roadmapv2.htm

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-mw4d/2009Oct/0020.html

<MiraS> no q's

http://www.w3.org/2008/MW4D/docs/roadmapv2.htm

http://www.w3.org/2008/MW4D/docs/roadmapv2.htm#head-692f59f051018ae2523ab3853fd72fa80fe78aab

<Renjish> 4th section

<Renjish> and also in the exec summary

<raphael> Last parag. of Content and Infrastructure, you use "channel"

<raphael> 4 times

<raphael> I agree with Steph

<raphael> we should be less techno oriented

<raphael> enabling more people to "access" the doc

<raphael> Maybe we could say somewhere that "bearer" could be used too, for channel

<raphael> in brackets

<raphael> it's the content / container concept, no?

resolution: adding a channel and putting defintion as bearer at the first appearance

<scribe> ACTION: steph to fix the bearer :channel and proof-read [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/10/29-mw4d-minutes.html#action01]

<Adesina> ok

<MiraS> ok

<raphael> +1

steph: people happy with the doc . any objection ?

ken: no objection

<Renjish> no objection

adesina: no objection

<raphael> no objection

<MiraS> no objection

Resolution: MW4D group agreed to move to the publication of the roadmap

<raphael> Next call, Nov. 9. ok with me - what time?

<scribe> ACTION: stephane to start discussion on the mailing-list on the next charter [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/10/29-mw4d-minutes.html#action02]

<MiraS> ok with me too

<Renjish> ok. Thanks

<raphael> thanks

<kiwanja> thanks, steph

thank to you !