See also: IRC log, previous 2009-05-19
<Ralph> some history of Zakim
RESOLVED to accept minutes of the May 19 telecon: http://www.w3.org/2009/05/19-swd-minutes.html
ACTION: Sean send notice to the list when Appendix C is ready for review [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/05/19-swd-minutes.html#action04] [DONE]
ACTION: Ralph to raise issue-214 with RDFa TF [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/05/05-swd-minutes.html#action01] [CONTINUES]
ACTION: Guus to prepare the request for PR [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/05/19-swd-minutes.html#action07] [DONE]
-> PR request
TomB: status?
Antoine: content is ready, nothing to change
... only thing to change is the status section and the links
Ralph: this version is intended to be a WD or a Note?
TomB: last week we proposed to publish SKOS
Primer as a Note at the time the final SKOS REC is published
... we still have a couple of meetings before that
TomB: there is a similar resolution for the
SKOS UC
... which is the status?
<Antoine> http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/SKOS/usecases/ucr-20090428.html
Antoine: exactly the same as the Primer from the process perspective
<edsu> Clay++
<Clay> edsu++
<Ralph> Three cheers for Clay and Ed
TomB: congrats to edsu and Clay for the lcsh
<Antoine> :me +1 :-)
<Clay> Antoine++
TomB: any comments on how it was received? any discussion relevant to the WG?
Clay: getting a lot of feedback on the UI
... also on concept coordination
edsu: I would like to talk with ralph about the
details of moving to new domain
... right now URLs are redirecting permanently to the new ones
<edsu> Antoine++
Clay: thank you also to Antoine
<Ralph> [I'm not seeing http://id.loc.gov/authorities/ cited yet from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Library_of_Congress_Subject_Headings ]
ACTION: Sean to complete implementation report by 19th [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/05/05-swd-minutes.html#action05] [DONE]
SKOS Implementation report -> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2009May/0070.html
TomB: redirection pages
Ralph: I asked Ian Jacobs about the preferred term: superseeded version
TomB: redirections for the SKOS Mapping vocab spec and Quick guide
Antoine: the only issue to deal with is branding, see agenda
PROPOSED change references to "SKOS 2008" to read "SKOS 2009" in the redirection pages in legacy SKOS core specifications
TomB: any discussion? (no objections)
RESOLUTION: change references to "SKOS 2008" to read "SKOS 2009" in the redirection pages in legacy SKOS core specifications
Ralph: I'm already changing the references
TomB: wikipedia page on SKOS is outdated
... i don't think we can assign actions to do anything about that
... this is one of the last telecons of the group, no time to track an action
on this
Ralph: allow access for Alistair
... Antoine also has access
TomB: what happens if they cannot update it?
Ralph: we don't have any special process for
this
... if there is someone else in the community that volunteers to help, how we
proceed?
... usually decision by the team and the editors
Antoine: maybe we should add a note at the bottom
Ralph: I don't like adding a note at the bottom
at the page, candidates must ping us instead
... anyway if the current maintainers cannot update it anymore, a note can be
added then asking for help
TomB: scope of that page mainly on activities under w3c umbrella, with external links to the community
<Ralph> +Guus
Ralph: will fix the typo with the mailing list in the status section
berrueta: maybe someone sent messages to the wrong mailing list?
Ralph: will double check the archives
ACTION: Ben review RDFa Use Cases and propose transition to Group Note [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/09/30-swd-minutes.html#action02] [CONTINUES]
Ralph: reports on last week telecons, see
minutes -> http://www.w3.org/2009/05/28-rdfa-minutes.html
... TF discussing whether lauching a XG or IG to carry on the technical
discussion and being a forum to answer questions from the community on RDFa
deployment
... discussing priorities for technical work
TomB: we should have this published as a
Note
... we need to move http://berrueta.net/recipes-20090407/
to W3C space
... which are the changes?
berrueta: slight change on the Apache directives
<Ralph> diffs from editor's draft
TomB: the change is small enough without a new review
RESOLVED to publish update of Recipes WG Note:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2009Apr/0017.html
Guus: I agree
ACTION: Ralph to review the revised Recipes draft [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/12/02-swd-minutes.html#action15] [DROPPED]
ACTION: Ralph to publish http://berrueta.net/recipes-20090407/ as a WG Note [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/06/02-swd-minutes.html#action07]
Ralph: (about action on Wordnet) we don't want to miss it, but it is not realistic to expect it done
ACTION: Ralph/Diego to work on Wordnet implementation [of Recipes implementations] [recorded in [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/06/02-swd-minutes.html#action08] [DROPPED]
http://www.w3.org/2008/01/22-swd-minutes.html#action20]
TomB: we have it in the minutes notes anyway
... there was some discussion on the list about content negotiation
... any comments? (no)
TomB: we have an ED, it was our intention to
publish a Note
... there are some issues and notes in the text
berrueta: i suggest to get it published as WD, even without fixing the open issues
TomB: we should try to publish it in W3C
space
... can Ralph move it out of the wiki into WG space
... ?
Ralph: strange to publish an initial draft at the end of the WG
<Guus> +1 for input to RDFa outreach
Ralph: we can move it to WG space as a ED
edsu: +1
ACTION: Ralph post his comments on the editor's draft of the metadata note [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/11/25-swd-minutes.html#action03] [DROPPED]
Guus: how we make it officially?
Ralph: no special process is required (WG space
is not /TR space)
... just removing it from the wiki attachment
Guus: fine with that
ACTION: Ralph to move current ED of the RDFa metadata note from wiki to WG space [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/06/02-swd-minutes.html#action10]
Guus: we need some telecons to get testimonials and feedback from AC reps
<Ralph> regrets for 16 June
Guus: I'm at risk for next telecon
TomB: next telecon Jun 23
Ralph: charter extension for a couple of weeks
<edsu> seanb++
<Ralph> Three cheers for Sean !
Guus: thanks to seanb for impl report
<Ralph> +Diego
Ralph: thank you to Tom and guus for leading us forward
<TomB> Meeting is adjourned.
[adjourned]