See also: IRC log
<joakim> scribe: Florian
<joakim> http://www.w3.org/2009/04/28-mediaann-minutes.html
scribe for next meeting: PA
next meeting 19.05. (same time)
<joakim> F2F 4 in Stockholm 25-26 June
<veroniqueM> I will be at a conference at these dates, I will not be able to attend, sorry!
<joakim> http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/track/actions/open
agenda (a) F2F in Stockholm (logistics)
agenda (b) reviewing the action items
ACTION-43 for Thierry: not at the irc
ACTION-47 for Werner: ongoing
ACTION-94 for Joakim
Joakim: wants to close ACTION-94 (allready discussed)
ACTION-101 for Felix
Veronique: Felix still waiting for publishment of the draft (ongoing)
ACTION-102 for Veronique (open)
<tobias> btw: I now got my CVS account
ACTION-109 for David: working on it (open)
close ACTION-110
<trackbot> ACTION-110 Double check the next F2F meeting date for other complicated things closed
ACTION-111 for Felix
Veronique: published a new link
on the mailing list concerning the topic
... suggests to send the link not via the mailing list but
personally
<joakim> http://dev.w3.org/2008/video/mediaann/mediaont-req/mediaont-req.html
<veroniqueM> Felix has sent a link to the updated version of the UC and Req document on the list
agenda (c) status of the UC & Req document
Joakim: the new version was not published
agenda (d) initial draft of the Ontology for Media Entity 1.0
Wonsuk: currently mapping table
is missing
... recieved initial draft from Veronique and Victor commented
this
http://dev.w3.org/2008/video/mediaann/mediaont-req/mediaont-req.html
oh sorry
http://dev.w3.org/2008/video/mediaann/mediaont-1.0/mediaont-1.0.html
Joakim: few formats are missing in the document
<joakim> Gotten: MediaRss, TXfeed, Youtube, VRA, MPEG7, SMTP, CableLabs
Wonsuk: wants to contact the editors of the missing formats
Joakim: new deadline for this friday (15.05.09)
<joakim> veronique?
Tobias: what should the editors do
Joakim: make a final mapping for the missing formats (somehow in one column)
close ACTION-94
<trackbot> ACTION-94 Talk about the liaison with the WebApps WG about their document "The Media Object Specification" and relation with our API. closed
Veronique: suggests to contact
the editors directly
... to be sure that they will get it till next friday
<veroniqueM> and not via the mailing list, as they did not react previously to the calls on the list
<joakim> Missing: ID3v2, iTunes, QT, SearchMnkey, LOM, EXIF, MIX, FRBR, TV-Anytime, EBU,
<tbrger> I suppose this action was distributed initially at the F2F which not all of us attended; so therefore the calls to the list were not recognized properly; mabye.
<veroniqueM> probably, yes
think so, too
<veroniqueM> still, a direct contact might be more efficient :)
<tbrger> I think so, too :-)
you are right veronique
Victor: currently not reviewing
any formats
... will choose one
Veronique: wanted to know if victor is in charge of FRBR
Joakim: now we need the final version, not volunteers
Victor: offers the review till friday
Veronique: definition section is
wrong
... needs an update
... also the introduction should be longer
... media entity not so cryptic
Joakim: reviews the introduction
Veronique: section 4.2.1 should be reviewed
Victor: reviews 4.2.1
Veronique: reviews the terminology part (2.1)
<victor> I have provided a first review to section 4.2.1 (in a Word sent to the email list)
<joakim> I agree - lets coordinate with FRAGGROUP
Werner: wants to know what to do
with the terminology (fix it in this document, or in another
draft)
... reffering to fragment group?
<pchampin> +1 for aligning vocabulary with Media Fragment
+1
<veroniqueM> +1
<wonsuk> +1
<joakim> can we give an action to someone to sort the key terms with media frag?
think so
<veroniqueM> well, I can see that in the terminology section
<victor> +1
<joakim> key terms, for example: entity?
<joakim> resource, representation
Werner: we can not avoid miss understandment without definition
Veronique: select one definition for our terms
PA: ambiguity can not be completly avoided
Veronique: fragment group is talking about ressources in contrast to MAWG
Joakim: proposed entity because it is either a ressource or a representation
Veronique: entity is the most
neutral term
... still ambiguous
Joakim: Action in order to identify the most important key words
Veronique: in charge of section 4
<veroniqueM> I will revise the terminology
Joakim: florian makes a first
version and than Veronique makes a review
... according to section 2.1
Wonsuk: when will the review be fininshed?
florian: till monday
<joakim> Wonsuk: How about you get all updates before sunday night?
<joakim> Wonsuk: How about you get all updates before sunday night?
monday would be better ;)
Joakim: tranform the mapping table will take 2-3 days
Victor: how is the contribution passed
+1 @ Veronique
shall i open actions? or will you do it joakim?
Wonsuk: tells how to contribute
<victor> perfect.
<scribe> ACTION: Joakim to review the introduction of Ontology for Media Entity 1.0 [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/05/12-mediaann-minutes.html#action01]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-113 - Review the introduction of Ontology for Media Entity 1.0 [on Joakim Söderberg - due 2009-05-19].
<scribe> ACTION: Florian reviewing section 2.1 of Ontology for Media Entity 1.0 (with the Fragment Group) [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/05/12-mediaann-minutes.html#action02]
<trackbot> Sorry, couldn't find user - Florian
<scribe> ACTION: florian reviewing section 2.1 of Ontology for Media Entity 1.0 (with the Fragment Group) [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/05/12-mediaann-minutes.html#action03]
<trackbot> Sorry, couldn't find user - florian
<joakim> : Zakim, ??P4 is me
<scribe> ACTION: florian reviewing section 2.1 of Ontology for Media Entity 1.0 (with the initial document of the Fragment Group) [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/05/12-mediaann-minutes.html#action04]
<trackbot> Sorry, couldn't find user - florian
<scribe> ACTION: Victor review of section 4 of Ontology for Media Entity 1.0 [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/05/12-mediaann-minutes.html#action05]
<trackbot> Sorry, couldn't find user - Victor
<scribe> ACTION: florian reviewing section 2.1 of Ontology for Media Entity 1.0 (with the initial document of the Fragment Group) [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/05/12-mediaann-minutes.html#action06]
<trackbot> Sorry, couldn't find user - florian
<scribe> ACTION: veronique reviewing section 2.1 of Ontology for Media Entity 1.0 (with the initial document of the Fragment Group) [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/05/12-mediaann-minutes.html#action07]
<trackbot> Sorry, couldn't find user - veronique
<scribe> ACTION: victor review of section 4 of Ontology for Media Entity 1.0 [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/05/12-mediaann-minutes.html#action08]
<trackbot> Sorry, couldn't find user - victor
<joakim> http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/wiki/MediaOntology
<scribe> ACTION: veroniqueM reviewing section 2.1 of Ontology for Media Entity 1.0 (with the initial document of the Fragment Group) [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/05/12-mediaann-minutes.html#action09]
<trackbot> Sorry, couldn't find user - veroniqueM
sorry...trackbot doesn?t know us ;) (veronique, victor, me)
we should try not to forget the action
yes it is
perhaps because i?m a scribe-beginner
sry
Werner: brosweable version of the mapping table would be good, but much work
<joakim> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2009Apr/0085.html
Werner: two minor properties
which are missing
... design question if they should be seperate elements
... tag line type of title (but is part of many other
formats)
<joakim> it's an asssociated resource, not the actual item
<joakim> PA: solve this by having a relation: "associated resource"
<pchampin> an intermediate solution would be that the API provide the "original" relation
Joakim: how to collect this attributes in the feature?
<pchampin> e.g. "the value for ma:relation is "thmb.png", and the original relation is exif:thumbnail"
Joakim: section in the current version?
Werner: tries to collect the
terms of the discussion and the mailing list
... makes sense to sort out these candidates
<scribe> ACTION: Werner add a Wiki Page for Candidates [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/05/12-mediaann-minutes.html#action10]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-114 - Add a Wiki Page for Candidates [on Werner Bailer - due 2009-05-19].
<wonsuk> +1 for joakim
<tobias> I also sent some comments regarding the properties beginning of May: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2009May/0000.html
Veronique: let the industry review our elements
<victor> ok
Joakim: postpone the API discussion for the next telecon#
<veroniqueM> be proactive to get feedback from the industry
<wonsuk> bye~~
<joakim> i think that shoudl be it
<joakim> please send a link of the minutes to the mailing lsit :-)
<joakim> list
ok, but i have not enough rights to look at is
-is+it
but i?ll send it
could you please open the last actions?
the first action was for victor to review section 4 and the second was for me two provide a new version of section 2.1 to veronique in order to review it
i was not able to open them
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.135 of Date: 2009/03/02 03:52:20 Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00) Succeeded: s/wwe/we/ Succeeded: s/accoridng/according/ Succeeded: s/daysw/days/ Found Scribe: Florian Inferring ScribeNick: florian WARNING: No "Topic:" lines found. Default Present: pchampin, +46.1.07.19.aaaa, +43.316.876.aadd, veroniqueM, wbailer, florian, wonsuk Present: pchampin +46.1.07.19.aaaa +43.316.876.aadd veroniqueM wbailer florian wonsuk Regrets: JP Felix WARNING: No meeting title found! You should specify the meeting title like this: <dbooth> Meeting: Weekly Baking Club Meeting Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2009May/0041.html Got date from IRC log name: 12 May 2009 Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2009/05/12-mediaann-minutes.html People with action items: florian joakim veronique veroniquem victor werner WARNING: No "Topic: ..." lines found! Resulting HTML may have an empty (invalid) <ol>...</ol>. Explanation: "Topic: ..." lines are used to indicate the start of new discussion topics or agenda items, such as: <dbooth> Topic: Review of Amy's report[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]