<trackbot> Date: 28 April 2009

<scribe> Scribe: mphillip

<scribe> Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-soap-jms/2009Apr/0045.html

<Roland> http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/tracker/actions/pendingreview

Actions

Roland: Messages sent to originators for action 83 and responses received confirming that actions are complete

close action 83

close action-83

<trackbot> ACTION-83 Close email thread on LC comments 7,8,9 closed

<Roland> http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/tracker/actions/open

Derek: Action 68 will be made an FAQ - no progress to date

Roland: On action 73 we still have the question of whether to change the jndi property prefix

Eric: We are still waiting for confirmation from Harald

Roland: Should we go ahead with the change anyway?

Eric: Last note to Harald said that we would make the change, but asked if it clarified anything
... Will send another note to Harald. We will not change anything unless Harald confirms that it would clarify the specification significantly
... Will aim to send note by end of today

Roland: That is the last candidate editorial update which remains
... Would like to be in position to transition to Candidate Recommendation
... Need a spec. which incorporates all last call comments
... We should resolve to go to candidate recommendation at the end of the week

Mark: So we would need a decision on whether we make the prefix change or not before then

Amy: You can make editorial changes once in Candidate Recommendation stage

Roland: Any disagreement on moving to Candidate Recommendation (CR)?

Eric: Agreed, subject to a response from Harald
... ...so we should be in a position to change status next Tuesday

Amy: We can resolve to go to CR once we have answered the last question

Resolution: We will transition to CR regardless of whether the prefix change is made or not the
... We will transition to CR regardless of whether the prefix change is made or not the

RESOLUTION: We will transition to CR regardless of whether the prefix change is made or not

URI Spec

Roland: Eric will chase the prefix change with Harald

Eric: No progress on getting to RFC
... Will send another note asking what we need to do next to get the RFC completed

Testing

<Roland> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-soap-jms/2009Apr/0036.html

Phil: Went through checking the test cases to see whether they matched any other assertions, and found a couple of assertions which were covered already by test cases

Roland: The remaining issues are WSDL coverage
... The wording of the conformance assertions has changed since the test assertions document was generated ( http://dev.w3.org/2008/ws/soapjms/testcases/assertions/assertions.html )

Phil: We should regen. the document each time the spec. changes

Roland: Need to think about how we satisfy the CR requirements - for each assertion to be covered by at least two implementations

Phil: Could be tricky - an implementation may not cover all the assertions - some are optional

Roland: Right, but there still needs to be two implementations

Eric: If IBM does not implement the WSDL support, how can an alternative implementation interoperate with an IBM hosted service?

Mark: Should the assertions table include a 'prescription' column to say if assertions are mandatory?

Roland: Will look through the assertions to see if wording can be clarified to make this clearer

This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.135  of Date: 2009/03/02 03:52:20  
Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/

Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00)

Found Scribe: mphillip
Inferring ScribeNick: mphillip
Default Present: +1.919.663.aaaa, alewis, Roland, Phil, Derek, +0196270aabb, mphillip, eric, Peter_Easton
Present: +1.919.663.aaaa alewis Roland Phil Derek +0196270aabb mphillip eric Peter_Easton
Regrets: Yves
Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-soap-jms/2009Apr/0045.html
Found Date: 28 Apr 2009
Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2009/04/28-soap-jms-minutes.html
People with action items: