<Yves> trackbot, start telcon

<trackbot> Date: 24 March 2009

<mphillip> Scribe: mphillip

Actions

http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/tracker/actions/open

<Roland> http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/tracker/actions/72

Roland: Incorporated Derek's changes into spec.

<Roland> latest version: http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2008/ws/soapjms/soapjms.html?content-type=text/html;%20charset=utf-8

Derek: Looks good

Roland: Will write back to Dongbo on TopicReplyTo

close action-72

<trackbot> ACTION-72 Incorporate Derek's text into spec. closed

Derek: No progress on http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/tracker/actions/68

Roland: No progress seen from Eric on http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/tracker/actions/70
... No progress from Peter on http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/tracker/actions/71
... Any thoughts on http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/tracker/actions/73 ?

I couldn't get excited about changing to a hyphenated naming convention

Roland: Nor could I. We will discuss further when Eric is on the call.

<Roland> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-soap-jms/2009Feb/0008.html

Last call commenbts

Roland: Dongbo's comments on the wording that a conforming implementation MUST implement the IRI specification

ACTION Roland to examine the wording of the conformance requirements section

<trackbot> Created ACTION-74 - Examine the wording of the conformance requirements section [on Roland Merrick - due 2009-03-31].

Roland: Believe that action 72 satisfies Dongbo's second point
... Her last point is how an implementation would reject a "queue" or "topic" URI if it does not support those variants

<Roland> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-soap-jms/2009Jan/0020.html

ACTION Phil to look at Dongbo's last point - what should an implementation do if it does not support a URI variant

<trackbot> Created ACTION-75 - Look at Dongbo's last point - what should an implementation do if it does not support a URI variant [on Phil Adams - due 2009-03-31].

Roland: Last link refers to issue raised by Derek on inconsistencies with the spelling of "NON_PERSISTENT"

Derek: This has not be fixed in the specification yet

<scribe> ACTION: Roland to change the Binding specification to use "NON_PERSISTENT" in 5 places where we use "NONPERSISTENT" [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/03/24-soap-jms-minutes.html#action01]

<trackbot> Created ACTION-76 - Change the Binding specification to use \"NON_PERSISTENT\" in 5 places where we use \"NONPERSISTENT\" [on Roland Merrick - due 2009-03-31].

<scribe> ScribeNick: Mark

This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.135  of Date: 2009/03/02 03:52:20  
Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/

Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00)

Succeeded: s/Phil/Peter/g
Found Scribe: mphillip
Inferring ScribeNick: mphillip
WARNING: No scribe lines found matching previous ScribeNick pattern: <Mark> ...
Found ScribeNick: Mark
WARNING: No scribe lines found matching ScribeNick pattern: <Mark> ...
ScribeNicks: Mark, mphillip

WARNING: No "Present: ... " found!
Possibly Present: Derek Peter Roland SW_RIF ScribeNick W3C_AC WS_SOAP-JM XML_ET-TF Yves active minutes mphillip next others rmerric scheduled start to trackbot
You can indicate people for the Present list like this:
        <dbooth> Present: dbooth jonathan mary
        <dbooth> Present+ amy


WARNING: Replacing previous Regrets list. (Old list: Eric)
Use 'Regrets+ ... ' if you meant to add people without replacing the list,
such as: <dbooth> Regrets+ +, Amy


WARNING: Replacing previous Regrets list. (Old list: +, Amy, Erix, Eric)
Use 'Regrets+ ... ' if you meant to add people without replacing the list,
such as: <dbooth> Regrets+ Eric, Amy

Regrets: Eric Amy
Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-soap-jms/2009Mar/0020.html
Found Date: 24 Mar 2009
Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2009/03/24-soap-jms-minutes.html
People with action items: roland

WARNING: Input appears to use implicit continuation lines.
You may need the "-implicitContinuations" option.