See also: IRC log
<trackbot> Date: 10 March 2009
Hello
<scribe> Scribe: peaston
<eric> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-soap-jms/2009Mar/0010.html
<eric> Peter, is that the mail you're referring to?
Including the standard JNDI property java.naming.referral to disable (ignore) JNDI provider referrals.
<soapjms:jndiContextParameter name=" java.naming.referral " value="ignore" />
Heres the change:
Including the standard JNDI property java.naming.referral to disable (ignore) JNDI provider referrals.
<soapjms:jndiContextParameter name=" java.naming.referral " value="ignore" />
Close: Action-62
close Action-62
<trackbot> ACTION-62 Make a proposal to clarify the wording and scope of the (221) jndiContext Parameter property) closed
<eric> Email from Phil: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-soap-jms/2009Feb/0009.html
close Action-65
<trackbot> ACTION-65 Clarify for content Type closed
<scribe> ACTION: Phil to come up with revised URI scheme pass for review next week [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/03/10-soap-jms-minutes.html#action01]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-69 - Come up with revised URI scheme pass for review next week [on Eric Adams - due 2009-03-17].
Per http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-soap-jms/2009Feb/0009.html above
Eric property should be specified as "text/xml" - "must" vs "should"
Eric: should be specified as "multipart/related". same must but there could be mime type parms
Amy: be precise about it say the
content type value must ....
... precise definition ct header has value plus
parms
<scribe> ACTION: Phil take another pass of the Content Type wording [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/03/10-soap-jms-minutes.html#action02]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-70 - Take another pass of the Content Type wording [on Phil Adams - due 2009-03-17].
Also bit about removing parens
<eric> Email under discussion: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-soap-jms/2009Mar/0012.html
<eric> Last call item: LC06 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-soap-jms/2009Jan/0008.html
<eric> Do we believe that Peter's email addresses the concern?
<scribe> ACTION: peaston to incorporate latest act 65 wordings in spec and email original Last Call commentor [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/03/10-soap-jms-minutes.html#action03]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-71 - Incorporate latest act 65 wordings in spec and email original Last Call commentor [on Peter Easton - due 2009-03-17].
<eric> Phil's revision: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-soap-jms/2009Mar/0014.html
Phil has just resent Content-Type discussion act 70
Peter,Eric ensure CT value appears
sorry !
Eric MUST vs must
Phil will send another email
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.133 of Date: 2008/01/18 18:48:51 Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00) Succeeded: s/Phil/Eric/ Succeeded: s/Phil/Eric/ Succeeded: s/Phil/Eric/ Found Scribe: peaston Inferring ScribeNick: peaston Default Present: +1.919.663.aaaa, alewis, +1.512.286.aabb, Phil, +1.650.846.aacc, eric, Peter_Easton Present: +1.919.663.aaaa alewis +1.512.286.aabb Phil +1.650.846.aacc eric Peter_Easton Found Date: 10 Mar 2009 Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2009/03/10-soap-jms-minutes.html People with action items: peaston phil WARNING: Input appears to use implicit continuation lines. You may need the "-implicitContinuations" option.[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]