W3C

- DRAFT -

Weekly Forms WG Teleconference

25 Feb 2009

Agenda

See also: IRC log

Attendees

Present
unl, prb, John_Boyer, Nick_van_den_Bleeken, Leigh_Klotz, wiecha, Steven, ebruchez
Regrets
MarkB
Chair
John
Scribe
Leigh

Contents


 

 

<John_Boyer> scribe: Leigh

<John_Boyer> scribenick: klotz

<John_Boyer> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-forms/2009Feb/0085.html

<John_Boyer> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-forms/2009Feb/0056.html

<nick> leigh can you create an action to update the testcase?

<John_Boyer> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-forms/2009Feb/0019.html

RESOLUTION: For http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-forms/2009Feb/0056.html we fix the test case and defer possible changes to processing of lazy-authoring empty instances to XForms 1.2.

<scribe> ACTION: Leigh Klotz to answer http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-forms/2009Feb/0019.html with the discussion from the minutes. [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/02/25-forms-minutes.html#action01]

<trackbot> Created ACTION-514 - Klotz to answer http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-forms/2009Feb/0019.html with the discussion from the minutes. [on Leigh Klotz, Jr. - due 2009-03-04].

http://xformstest.org/2009-02-25.txt

RESOLUTION: We re-visit http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-forms/2009Feb/0082.html and http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-forms/2009Feb/0062.html for XForms 1.2.

<John_Boyer> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-forms/2009Feb/0023.html

<nick> leigh: can it be that there is no action For http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-forms/2009Feb/0056.html we fix the test case and defer possible changes to processing of lazy-authoring empty instances to XForms 1.2.

<nick> for the record : Namespace Nodes Each element has an associated set of namespace nodes, one for each distinct namespace prefix that is in scope for the element (including the xml prefix, which is implicitly declared by the XML Namespaces Recommendation XMLNAMES) and one for the default namespace if one is in scope for the element.

RESOLUTION: We accept implementation feedback for XForms 1.1 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-forms/2009Feb/0023.html

<scribe> ACTION: John Boyer to amend XForms 1.1 in accordance with http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-forms/2009Feb/0023.html to change insert, delete, and setvalue to say that they ignore changes to namespace nodes and root nodes. [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/02/25-forms-minutes.html#action02]

<trackbot> Sorry, amibiguous username (more than one match) - John

<trackbot> Try using a different identifier, such as family name or username (eg. jkugelma, jboyer)

RESOLUTION: The Forms WG sees value in the November TPAC and many members plan to attend.

<nick> my AC-rep isn't comming

<Steven> http://www.w3.org/Member/Meeting/2009ac/March/Overview.html

<John_Boyer> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-forms/2009Feb/0048.html

<John_Boyer> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-forms/2009Feb/0074.html

<scribe> ACTION: John Boyer to amend XForms 1.1 for xforms-link- and xforms-version- exceptions to say that we don't expect the UI to be running, nor action handlers to fire, as discussed at the Feb 2009 / Google / Mountain View F2F [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/02/25-forms-minutes.html#action03]

<trackbot> Sorry, amibiguous username (more than one match) - John

<trackbot> Try using a different identifier, such as family name or username (eg. jkugelma, jboyer)

<nick> other test of event() http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/Forms/Test/XForms1.1/Edition1/Chapt07/7.11/7.11.2/7.11.2.a.xhtml

RESOLUTION: We drop test 7.11.2.b because there is another test of the event function and this test is erroneous.

<nick> (using insert event context info)

<scribe> ACTION: Nick van den Bleeken to drop XForms 1.1 test 7.11.2.b [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/02/25-forms-minutes.html#action04]

<trackbot> Created ACTION-515 - Van den Bleeken to drop XForms 1.1 test 7.11.2.b [on Nick Van Den Bleeken - due 2009-03-04].

<scribe> ACTION: John Boyer to remove xforms-link-error from XForms 1.1 [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/02/25-forms-minutes.html#action05]

<trackbot> Sorry, amibiguous username (more than one match) - John

<trackbot> Try using a different identifier, such as family name or username (eg. jkugelma, jboyer)

<nick> leigh you also enter the actions in your minutes?

<scribe> ACTION: Nick van den Bleeken to remove xforms-link-error tests XForms 1.1 [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/02/25-forms-minutes.html#action06]

<trackbot> Created ACTION-516 - Van den Bleeken to remove xforms-link-error tests XForms 1.1 [on Nick Van Den Bleeken - due 2009-03-04].

nick yes I am copying and pasting from the minutes.

<nick> ok, tnx, I process your minutes to extract the actions

<scribe> ACTION: John Boyer to remove resource-uri example from event function in XForms 1.1. [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/02/25-forms-minutes.html#action07]

<trackbot> Sorry, amibiguous username (more than one match) - John

<trackbot> Try using a different identifier, such as family name or username (eg. jkugelma, jboyer)

Summary of Action Items

[NEW] ACTION: John Boyer to amend XForms 1.1 for xforms-link- and xforms-version- exceptions to say that we don't expect the UI to be running, nor action handlers to fire, as discussed at the Feb 2009 / Google / Mountain View F2F [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/02/25-forms-minutes.html#action03]
[NEW] ACTION: John Boyer to amend XForms 1.1 in accordance with http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-forms/2009Feb/0023.html to change insert, delete, and setvalue to say that they ignore changes to namespace nodes and root nodes. [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/02/25-forms-minutes.html#action02]
[NEW] ACTION: John Boyer to remove resource-uri example from event function in XForms 1.1. [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/02/25-forms-minutes.html#action07]
[NEW] ACTION: John Boyer to remove xforms-link-error from XForms 1.1 [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/02/25-forms-minutes.html#action05]
[NEW] ACTION: Leigh Klotz to answer http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-forms/2009Feb/0019.html with the discussion from the minutes. [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/02/25-forms-minutes.html#action01]
[NEW] ACTION: Nick van den Bleeken to drop XForms 1.1 test 7.11.2.b [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/02/25-forms-minutes.html#action04]
[NEW] ACTION: Nick van den Bleeken to remove xforms-link-error tests XForms 1.1 [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/02/25-forms-minutes.html#action06]
 
[End of minutes]

Minutes formatted by David Booth's scribe.perl version 1.133 (CVS log)
$Date: 2009/02/25 17:16:44 $

Scribe.perl diagnostic output

[Delete this section before finalizing the minutes.]
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.133  of Date: 2008/01/18 18:48:51  
Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/

Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00)

Found Scribe: Leigh
Found ScribeNick: klotz

WARNING: No "Topic:" lines found.

Default Present: unl, prb, John_Boyer, Nick_van_den_Bleeken, Leigh_Klotz, wiecha, Steven, ebruchez
Present: unl prb John_Boyer Nick_van_den_Bleeken Leigh_Klotz wiecha Steven ebruchez
Regrets: MarkB
Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-forms/2009Feb/0085.html
Got date from IRC log name: 25 Feb 2009
Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2009/02/25-forms-minutes.html
People with action items: bleeken boyer den john klotz leigh nick van

WARNING: Input appears to use implicit continuation lines.
You may need the "-implicitContinuations" option.


WARNING: No "Topic: ..." lines found!  
Resulting HTML may have an empty (invalid) <ol>...</ol>.

Explanation: "Topic: ..." lines are used to indicate the start of 
new discussion topics or agenda items, such as:
<dbooth> Topic: Review of Amy's report


[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]