<trackbot> Date: 24 February 2009

<scribe> Scribe:peaston

<Roland> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-soap-jms/2009Feb/0019.html

<scribe> Chair:Roland

Actions

<Roland> http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/tracker/actions/open

<Derek> http://dev.w3.org/2008/ws/soapjms/testcases/

<Roland> http://dev.w3.org/2008/ws/soapjms/testcases/assertions/assertions.html

Close: Action-53

close action-53

<trackbot> ACTION-53 Provide testcase(s) in properties area closed

<Roland> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-soap-jms/2009Feb/0017.html

<Roland> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-soap-jms/2009Feb/0020.html

discussing Action 64 topic reply to name

phil: this is a corner case perhaps not specify

<Phil> I think that was eric, not phil :)

: Re:ACTION-62 Make a proposal to clarify the wording and scope of the (221) jndiContext Parameter property)

: Re:ACTION-62 Make a proposal to clarify the wording and scope of the (221) jndiContext Parameter property)

this is a corner case perhaps not specify

roland: we should specify the jndi case
... if you use jndi ignore topicReplyTo

<Roland> Dongbo question: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-soap-jms/2009Feb/0008.html

eric: hesitant to add topicReplyTo to wsdl

derek: could we just use it in the URI
... could have a reply to type

eric: do we have a conflict if wsdl and URI are inconsistent
... we could leave this in the URI spec

roland: what about error conditions

mphillips: just take the first one in the URI is there are conflicts

eric: there are a bunch of error cases

derek: make statements about what is ignored versus errors if the URI has conflicting R2 specs

<scribe> ACTION: derek to redraft words re replyTo and topicReplyTO [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/02/24-soap-jms-minutes.html#action01]

<trackbot> Created ACTION-67 - Redraft words re replyTo and topicReplyTO [on Derek Rokicki - due 2009-03-03].

<Roland> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-soap-jms/2009Feb/0022.html

discuss jndiContextParameters proposal act 62

roland the security principal may be contraversial otherwise ok

peter will pick another property

Act 66 Additional Robust In-Only MEP

<Roland> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-soap-jms/2009Feb/0018.html

<Roland> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-soap-jms/2009Feb/0021.html

amy: Robust In-Only designed with JMS in mind

I muted

roland: we could fully specify it or specify it as other meps like RIO are not prohibited

eric: or do nothing note that we have to consider security concerns of NOT being rebust

amy roland etc: additional MEPS allowable is good

roland: do we state this in the spec i.e. other MEPS ok

derek: if we don't define RIO fully could be interpop issues

eric: is RIO a SOAP MEP ? should check

amy: SOAP WG only defined SOAP/HTTP perhaps SOAP/email
... RIO is being implemented getting traction

roland: this is a significant addition i.e. time spec tests etc
... adding an MEP may reset the W3C process

phil: what about next rev

eric: how about a non-normative appendix ?
... RIO has JMS QOS implications
... non-normative section(appendix) would be a step in the right direction

roland: Q1 do we want a normative section ?

all: no

roland: any volunteers for a non-normative section ?

all: generally restrained response

<scribe> ACTION: derek to draft words on what you can do with non-normative MEPs like RIO [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/02/24-soap-jms-minutes.html#action02]

<trackbot> Created ACTION-68 - Draft words on what you can do with non-normative MEPs like RIO [on Derek Rokicki - due 2009-03-03].

This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.133  of Date: 2008/01/18 18:48:51  
Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/

Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00)

Found Scribe: peaston
Inferring ScribeNick: peaston
Default Present: alewis, Roland, +1.708.246.aaaa, Phil, Derek, peaston, eric, mphillip
Present: alewis Roland +1.708.246.aaaa Phil Derek peaston eric mphillip
Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-soap-jms/2009Feb/0019.html
Found Date: 24 Feb 2009
Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2009/02/24-soap-jms-minutes.html
People with action items: derek

WARNING: Input appears to use implicit continuation lines.
You may need the "-implicitContinuations" option.