See also: IRC log
<trackbot> Date: 10 February 2009
<Roland> Scribe: bhakti
<Roland> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-soap-jms/2009Feb/0006.html
<Roland> http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/tracker/actions/pendingreview
close Action 63
<Roland> close action-63
<trackbot> ACTION-63 Respond to dongbo to say that the spec has been clarified re: IRI scheme jndi requirement closed
Derek: Do not mention for queue or topic replyTo in spec in new spec which seems to be different from old spec
<Roland> "topicReplyToName" parameter
<scribe> ACTION:Derek clarify spec about topic replyToName [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/02/10-soap-jms-minutes.html#action01]
Derek: for asynchronous approach have another thread handling the error message
Roland: should discuss more about it
<scribe> ACTION:Derek to bring up the additional MEP [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/02/10-soap-jms-minutes.html#action02]
Roland: comment on JMS URI but seems in good shape
Phil: It is not the SOAP JMS spec to dictate the values used in contentType
<scribe> ACTION:Phil clarify for content Type [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/02/10-soap-jms-minutes.html#action03]
<Yves> trackbot, start telcon
<trackbot> Meeting: SOAP-JMS Binding Working Group Teleconference
<trackbot> Date: 10 February 2009
<Yves> ACTION: Derek clarify spec about topic replyToName [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/02/10-soap-jms-minutes.html#action04]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-64 - Clarify spec about topic replyToName [on Derek Rokicki - due 2009-02-17].
<Yves> ACTION Phil clarify for content Type
<trackbot> Created ACTION-65 - Clarify for content Type [on Phil Adams - due 2009-02-17].
Roland: Reviewing Dongbo's comments
<Roland> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-soap-jms/2009Jan/0015.html
<Yves> ACTION Derek to bring up the additional MEP
<trackbot> Created ACTION-66 - Bring up the additional MEP [on Derek Rokicki - due 2009-02-17].
Roland: inconsistency between sec 2.2 and 3.4.5
Derek: maybe there is a problem we may need to clarify
<scribe> ACTION:Derek to send email to clarify on precendence [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/02/10-soap-jms-minutes.html#action05]
<Roland> LC10 - http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-soap-jms/2009Jan/0020.html
Derek: In SOAP JMS binding spec we do not have underscores to make it NON_PERSIStENT
Derek: sec 2.2.2 deliveryMode should be NON_PERSISTENT
Phil: add package name before DeliveryMode
<scribe> ACTION:Derek changed required for section 2.2.2 [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/02/10-soap-jms-minutes.html#action06]