See also: IRC log
MS: objective is to get consensus on publishing
<squillace> response from CI: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-ert/2009Jan/0012.html
MS: tried to generalize abstract
... and refine in later sections
CI: we start talking about content rather than
pointers
... maybe need to focus more on the pointers aspect
MS: remove definition and just talk about pointers?
CI: or move to the end of the abstract
SAZ: like the approach of explaining that we
are talkng about different types of content, then to go into pointers
... but maybe too much detail and definition
... note that the abstract will also be reviewed by others as part of the
publication process
MS: what do we need for status of the document?
SAZ: status of the document should always be
the "living breathing" part of the document
... it should explain what the purpose of this draft is, and what we expect
from the reader
<scribe> ACTION: msquillac to update Abstract and Status of the Document [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/01/28-er-minutes.html#action01]
<trackbot> Sorry, couldn't find user - msquillac
<scribe> ACTION: msquilla to update Abstract and Status of the Document [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/01/28-er-minutes.html#action02]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-71 - Update Abstract and Status of the Document [on Michael Squillace - due 2009-02-04].
<scribe> ACTION: shadi to look into CVS access for editors [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/01/28-er-minutes.html#action03]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-72 - Look into CVS access for editors [on Shadi Abou-Zahra - due 2009-02-04].
MS: namespace?
SAZ: will have to be 2009
<scribe> ACTION: carlosI to replace http://www.w3.org/2008/pointers with http://www.w3.org/2009/pointers [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/01/28-er-minutes.html#action04]
<trackbot> Sorry, couldn't find user - carlosI
<carlosI> ACTION: ciglesia to replace http://www.w3.org/2008/pointers with http://www.w3.org/2009/pointer [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/01/28-er-minutes.html#action05]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-73 - Replace http://www.w3.org/2008/pointers with http://www.w3.org/2009/pointer [on Carlos Iglesias - due 2009-02-04].
MS: some pointers should be abstract
... must adapt the language accordingly
CI: agree but may be difficult to express semantically
http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/EARL10/WD-EARL10-Schema-20081126#TestMode
SAZ: will need careful wording
CI: then RFC keywords loose their meaning if we can't put definitive restricitons
SAZ: think the issue is using the keywords to
express application-specific restrictions
... but to keep this separate from the semantics
MS: should we frame issue as a question?
SAZ: suggest adding an editor note to section
1.2 that we are looking into the use of the keywords
... but publish the document as-is
<scribe> ACTION: ciglesia add editor's note to section 1.2 about revising the use of keywords [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/01/28-er-minutes.html#action06]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-74 - Add editor's note to section 1.2 about revising the use of keywords [on Carlos Iglesias - due 2009-02-04].
<scribe> ACTION: ciglesia to remove section 2.3.4 [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/01/28-er-minutes.html#action07]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-75 - Remove section 2.3.4 [on Carlos Iglesias - due 2009-02-04].
<scribe> ACTION: ciglesia to rename compound pointer [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/01/28-er-minutes.html#action08]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-76 - Rename compound pointer [on Carlos Iglesias - due 2009-02-04].
MS: in 2.4.2, does it means that tools have to process Content-in-RDF?
SAZ: no, only this one property
<scribe> ACTION: ciglesia rename ptr:pointer to ptr:groupPointer [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/01/28-er-minutes.html#action09]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-77 - Rename ptr:pointer to ptr:groupPointer [on Carlos Iglesias - due 2009-02-04].
RESOLUTION: to publish Pointer-in-RDF as a first public working draft, with the changes discussed
deferred
next meeting: Wednesday 4 February