<scribe> Scribe: Len Charest

<scribe> ScribeNick: lencharest

<johnarwe_> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-sml/2009Jan/att-0025/20090115-sml-minutes.html

Approval of minutes from 2009-01-15

RESOLUTION: Minutes approved

Action 215

<scribe> No progress, but updates to speadsheet have been made by others

John: Will close action 215

Action 210

MSM: Have draft wording for old namespace docs

<MSM> http://www.w3.org/2008/09/sml

<MSM> http://www.w3.org/2008/09/sml-if

MSM: Above URIs show current wording

Len: Change all occurences of 'namespaces' to 'namespace'

Otherwise, Group approves draft language

Where should schema docs live?

MSM: Webmaster put them under ns/ directory, along with namespace docs
... But I see no other schema docs in the ns/ directory
... Propose that we adopt policy of publishing "dated" schema URIs akin to the dated URIs for TRs

RESOLUTION: Dated schema URIs will be implemented

WG teleconference time going forward

John: Propose 12:30pm-1:30pm Eastern on Mondays starting with first meeting in Feb

RESOLUTION: WG teleconference will take place from 12:30pm-1:30pm Eastern on Mondays starting with first meeting in Feb

Bug 6443 - German message text

RESOLUTION: Text will be changed per description in bug text

John: Bug updated as editorial

Bug 6245 - SML locid example request from ITS Interest Group

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6245

Implementation report

<johnarwe_> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-sml/2009Jan/0041.html

Current rev of spreadsheet in CVS is 1.6

Ginny: derefNV is about testing smlfn:deref outside a validator; will we have an implementation

John: Depends on how we define the test
... One option is to say derefNV is not relevant for demonstration of implementation experience

Option two: change the definition of derefNV so that we don't need to test outside the context of a validator

Ginny: Focus of tests is on SML validators

John: Conclusion seems to be that derefNV is not relevant for SML interop

Kumar: SML spec section 4.2.7 has note adressing smlfn:deref and interop

MSM: There is value in separation of defn of smlfn:deref from SML validation; smlfn:deref is useful outside of validation
... reluctant to lose the derefNV feature

Ginny: Would COSMOS serve as an implementation of derefNV because of how smlfn:deref is implemented?

John: Yes
... We have consensus to update the spreadsheet as described by http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-sml/2009Jan/0022.html

Kumar will make change #1 -- adding a second expected results column to differentiate between implementations supporting the

feature and one for those not supporting it

<johnarwe_> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-sml/2009Jan/0047.html

John: Text re row 19 actually applies to row 16

Kumar: MS impl matches expected result for row 16

John: Re row 29 -- Multiple sml:uris means not a valid SML ref; should we remove the test case?

Kumar: suggest updating expected result instead

Ginny: If test is discarded, then create a test that specifically addresses non-root elements

<johnarwe_> http://dev.eclipse.org/viewcvs/index.cgi/org.eclipse.cosmos/tests/resource-modeling/org.eclipse.cosmos.rm.validation.tests/src/test-resources/deref/MultipleNonRoot.xml?root=Technology_Project&view=markup

<johnarwe_> <sml:uri>Courses#smlxpath1(/u:Courses/u:Course[2])</sml:uri>

John: There are many other tests that target non-root; shall we remove row 29?

MSM: Let's just mark it invalid

John: In the past, we've removed invalid tests
... For consistency, let's remove the test in row 29 (but preserve the row so that row numbers remain the same)
... Re row 76 --- need MS results

Kumar: MS results are 76 is false, 77 is true

John: Re 96-99 --- we should add remarks to suggest cosmos alter the tests so a non-supporting impl would find the model invalid
... How shall we define test pass? Percentage of tests where actual result equals expected result?

MSM: W3C has no rule on this

Transition to PR

MSM: We need a "clean" copy of the spec that is ready to publish at any time
... We need an estimate from the editors on when we will have a ready-to-publish draft

John: Shall we request transition to PR?
... Sandy has already said "yes"
... We have consensus

RESOLUTION: WG will request transition to PR status for SML and SML-IF specs

Ginny: Outstanding editorial changes will be made within a week

<johnarwe_> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-sml/2009Jan/0022.html

<johnarwe_> under "changes still needed"

<johnarwe_> all have 2x - (--) in front

This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.133  of Date: 2008/01/18 18:48:51  
Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/

Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00)

Succeeded: s/doc/docs/
Succeeded: s/interop/demonstration of implementation experience/
Succeeded: s/Sanday/Sandy/
Succeeded: s/Outsantding/Outstanding/
Found Scribe: Len Charest
Found ScribeNick: lencharest
Default Present: lencharest, johnarwe_, Sandy, Ginny_Smith, [Microsoft], MSM
Present: lencharest johnarwe_ Sandy Ginny_Smith [Microsoft] MSM
Got date from IRC log name: 22 Jan 2009
Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2009/01/22-sml-minutes.html
People with action items: 

WARNING: Input appears to use implicit continuation lines.
You may need the "-implicitContinuations" option.