ISSUE-37
Simplified c14n for signing versus more general c14n, e.g. not produce compliant xml document
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- Rqmts (XML Security Use Cases and Requirements)
- Raised by:
- Scott Cantor
- Opened on:
- 2008-07-29
- Description:
If the canonicalization is the last transform before the data is passed into a signature process to be hashed, the output of the canonicalization doesn't need to be xml. This could help performance because the dataset being passed into the signature process could be size optimized.
- Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- 2009-03-31 Minutes for Approval (from edsimon@xmlsec.com on 2009-04-03)
- Agenda: Distributed Meeting 2009-03-31 (from frederick.hirsch@nokia.com on 2009-03-30)
- Agenda: Distributed Meeting 2009-03-24 v2 (resend) (from frederick.hirsch@nokia.com on 2009-03-23)
- Agenda: Distributed Meeting 2009-03-24 v2 (from Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com on 2009-03-23)
- Agenda: Distributed Meeting 2009-03-24 (resend) (from Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com on 2009-03-22)
- Agenda: Distributed Meeting 2009-03-24 (from Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com on 2009-03-22)
- Agenda: Distributed Meeting 2009-03-17 (resend) (from frederick.hirsch@nokia.com on 2009-03-11)
- Agenda: Distributed meeting 2009-03-17 (from Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com on 2009-03-11)
- Requirements as Issues (XML Signature and Canonicalization V Next Requirements) (from gerald.edgar@boeing.com on 2009-03-09)
- Action: A need to address requirements listed as Issues (from gerald.edgar@boeing.com on 2008-09-22)
- Meeting record: 2008-07-29 (from tlr@w3.org on 2008-08-12)
- Draft minutes for Jul 29 meeting (from cantor.2@osu.edu on 2008-07-31)
Related notes:
2009-03-31 16:08:59: Closed: C14N is not required. As a result "simplified" is not required either. [Gerald Edgar]
Display change log
