ISSUE-218: For canonical xml 2.0 is eliminating inclusive c14n an issue for xml:base etc (which use cases are impacted), and should QName aware be mandatory

For canonical xml 2.0 is eliminating inclusive c14n an issue for xml:base etc (which use cases are impacted), and should QName aware be mandatory

State:
CLOSED
Product:
Raised by:
Opened on:
2010-11-16
Description:
Related Actions Items:
No related actions
Related emails:
  1. 2.0 Issues - status? (from Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com on 2011-01-03)
  2. ISSUE-218: For canonical xml 2.0 is eliminating inclusive c14n an issue for xml:base etc (which use cases are impacted), and should QName aware be mandatory (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2010-11-16)

Related notes:

[fjh]: see http://www.w3.org/2008/xmlsec/Drafts/c14n-20/#sec-Canonicalization-Parameters, also ISSUE-221

8 Mar 2011, 16:08:06

Display change log ATOM feed


Chair, Staff Contact
Tracker: documentation, (configuration for this group), originally developed by Dean Jackson, is developed and maintained by the Systems Team <w3t-sys@w3.org>.
$Id: 218.html,v 1.1 2017/01/10 16:24:49 carine Exp $