Copyright © 2011 W3C® (MIT, ERCIM, Keio), All Rights Reserved. W3C liability, trademark and document use rules appl
These results document the interoperability of multiple implementations for the features of the API for Media Resources 1.0.
The goal, at this stage of development, is to demonstrate that every part of the API for Media Resources 1.0 specification can be and has been implemented. For this, each test must be passed by at least two implementations.
This matrix does cover all the API for Media Resources 1.0 features.
The public API 1.0 Implementation report was designed to validate the exit criteria of the API for Media Resources 1.0 specification.
The API 1.0 Implementation report is maintained by the Media Annotations Working Group.
Comments on this document should be sent to <public-media-annotation@w3.org>. The archive of public comments is available at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/
The following elements are considered features of the API:
The API is designed for both client- and server side implementations. Depending on whether the API is implemented in a user agent or plugin, or as a web service, different communication patterns are more appropriate. In the client side case, asynchronous access is typically preferred, while synchronous access is more appropriate for a web service. Thus the two version of the interface are not considered distinct features but different modes of access for the different use cases.
@@@@
API for Media Resource 1.0 is implemented in a large variety of products. Following is a non exhaustive list of products that support API 1.0, for information only.
The following are implementations of the API for Media Resource 1.0:
The following are applications using features of the Media Annotation Ontology:
This implementation report tested 2 separate API for Media Resource 1.0 implementations.
The data presented here is intended solely to be used as proof of API for Media Resource 1.0 implementability. It is only a snapshot of the actual implementation behaviors at one moment of time, this data is not intended to be used for assessing or grading the performance of any individual implementation.
The following table lists the API for Media Resource 1.0 implementations used to cover by the test results.
Company | Product | Version | Type | Platform |
---|---|---|---|---|
JOANNEUM RESEARCH Salzburg Research University of Passau |
@@@ | webservice | Windows XP | |
JOANNEUM RESEARCH |
@@@ | Browser extension | Windows XP | |
The Implementation results are presented into 2 different matrix covering all API for Media Resources 1.0 features:
@@@
Conclusion:
@@@ TBD On @@@ 2011 each test in the API 1.0 Test Suite has at least two passing implementations developed independently. Therefore the exit criteria mentioned inthe Status of this Document section of the API for Media Resources 1.0 Candidate Recommendation are fulfilled. @@@