See also: IRC log
<scribe> scribe: Len Charest
<scribe> scribeNick: lencharest
<johnarwe_> does msm have power, and/or will he be joining us?
Resolution: Minutes approved
John: Action is complete, will be closed
MSM: W3 auto-generated namespace docs for the old/obsolete SML-related namespaces
MSM: Propose adding text to the auto-generated namespace docs declaring the namespaces to be obsolete/superseded
<johnarwe_> near the end, starting with NB, is an indented draft for "superseded"\
RESOLUTION: Update the old namespace docs with text similar to that in the above referenced mail message
<scribe> ACTION: MSM to draft updates to old namespace docs [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/12/18-sml-minutes.html#action01]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-210 - Draft updates to old namespace docs [on Michael Sperberg-McQueen - due 2008-12-25].
John: Propose updating current namespace docs to contain the text that the WG agreed to
<MSM> I see that strictly speaking what Kumar drafted was a 'namespace policy'. So perhaps the best action is to add the approved namespace policy to the current ns documents.
<MSM> draft policy provided 17 November at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-sml/2008Nov/0034.html
<MSM> also resolves
RESOLUTION: Update the current namespace docs by appending the text re namespace policy that the WG has already approved
<johnarwe_> note: append was used in the colloquial sense of "incorporate", not the lteral programmer sense
RESOLUTION: Update the current namespace docs to accurately reflect the location of schema documents
<scribe> ACTION: MSM to update the current namespace docs by appending the text re namespace policy that the WG has already approved [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/12/18-sml-minutes.html#action02]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-211 - Update the current namespace docs by appending the text re namespace policy that the WG has already approved [on Michael Sperberg-McQueen - due 2008-12-25].
<scribe> ACTION: MSM to update the current namespace docs to accurately reflect the location of schema documents [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/12/18-sml-minutes.html#action03]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-212 - Update the current namespace docs to accurately reflect the location of schema documents [on Michael Sperberg-McQueen - due 2008-12-25].
John: Closing action 209
Kirk: Completed filling in bib
... but having trouble with CVS
Len: Agrees to check in doc on behalf of Kirk
John: How will you convert Word doc to HTML?
Len: "Save as filtered HTML" in Word
MSM: Post-editing may be required to satisfy pubrules
Len: Volunteer to perform necessary post-conversion editing on both notes to satisfy pubrules
John: Do we want to review Word version of notes before conversion and editing?
Kirk: Propose that we perform conversion without additional review, will review HTML versions
RESOLUTION: Perform conversion of notes without additional review, will review HTML versions
<scribe> ACTION: lencharest to convert notes to HTML and satisfy pubrules [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/12/18-sml-minutes.html#action04]
<trackbot> Sorry, couldn't find user - lencharest
<scribe> ACTION: Len to convert notes to HTML and satisfy pubrules [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/12/18-sml-minutes.html#action05]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-213 - Convert notes to HTML and satisfy pubrules [on Len Charest - due 2008-12-25].
COSMOS has interpreted the spec contrary to the intent of the WG
Conclusion: text is ambiguous
John: Shall we draft new text to clarify the issue?
RESOLUTION: Add text to the SML-IF spec to clarify WG intent around this issue
Ginny suggests that the cell formulas on the feature-test-map are incorrect.
Len: I looked at it, but I'm not the Excel guru you're looking for
John: Suggest asking Pratul for assistance
<johnarwe_> sample impl reports... http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-sml/2008Dec/0032.html
John: Looking at the content of the Feature Name column in SMLFeatureImplementationReport.html, it appears that some decisions from previous WG meetings have not yet been incorporated into the spreadsheet
Len: Volunteers to grovel the minutes and make the appropriate updates to the spreadsheet
SMLTestCaseImplementationResults.html reveals some
inconsistencies in the spreadsheet
... Need consensus on rows where expected result is missing or inconsistent
... Also need to express multiple primary features in such a way that spreadsheet<->XML round-tripping is preserved
... or drop XSLX in favor of XML version of data
John: WG is in recess for 2 weeks
<johnarwe_> 3 weeks to jan 8, since jan 1 is a holiday for virtually all in us
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.133 of Date: 2008/01/18 18:48:51 Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00) Succeeded: s/clear/ambiguous/ Succeeded: s/not ambiguous/ambiguous/ Succeeded: s/roundtrippin/round-tripping/ WARNING: Bad s/// command: s/2/3/\ Found Scribe: Len Charest Found ScribeNick: lencharest Default Present: +1.425.896.aaaa, johnarwe_, len, Kirk, MSM Present: +1.425.896.aaaa johnarwe_ len Kirk MSM Regrets: Sandy Ginny Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-sml/2008Dec/0031.html Got date from IRC log name: 18 Dec 2008 Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2008/12/18-sml-minutes.html People with action items: len lencharest msm[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]