<scribe> scribe: Len Charest

<scribe> scribeNick: lencharest

<johnarwe_> does msm have power, and/or will he be joining us?

<johnarwe_> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-sml/2008Dec/att-0030/20081211-sml-minutes.html

Approval of minutes from Dec 11

Resolution: Minutes approved

Action 208

John: Action is complete, will be closed

Action 209

MSM: W3 auto-generated namespace docs for the old/obsolete SML-related namespaces

<johnarwe_> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-sml/2008Dec/0038.html

MSM: Propose adding text to the auto-generated namespace docs declaring the namespaces to be obsolete/superseded

<johnarwe_> near the end, starting with NB, is an indented draft for "superseded"\

RESOLUTION: Update the old namespace docs with text similar to that in the above referenced mail message

<scribe> ACTION: MSM to draft updates to old namespace docs [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/12/18-sml-minutes.html#action01]

<trackbot> Created ACTION-210 - Draft updates to old namespace docs [on Michael Sperberg-McQueen - due 2008-12-25].

John: Propose updating current namespace docs to contain the text that the WG agreed to

<MSM> I see that strictly speaking what Kumar drafted was a 'namespace policy'. So perhaps the best action is to add the approved namespace policy to the current ns documents.

<MSM> draft policy provided 17 November at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-sml/2008Nov/0034.html

<johnarwe_> http://www.w3.org/ns/sml.html

<MSM> http://www.w3.org/ns/sml

<MSM> also resolves

RESOLUTION: Update the current namespace docs by appending the text re namespace policy that the WG has already approved

<johnarwe_> note: append was used in the colloquial sense of "incorporate", not the lteral programmer sense

RESOLUTION: Update the current namespace docs to accurately reflect the location of schema documents

<scribe> ACTION: MSM to update the current namespace docs by appending the text re namespace policy that the WG has already approved [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/12/18-sml-minutes.html#action02]

<trackbot> Created ACTION-211 - Update the current namespace docs by appending the text re namespace policy that the WG has already approved [on Michael Sperberg-McQueen - due 2008-12-25].

<scribe> ACTION: MSM to update the current namespace docs to accurately reflect the location of schema documents [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/12/18-sml-minutes.html#action03]

<trackbot> Created ACTION-212 - Update the current namespace docs to accurately reflect the location of schema documents [on Michael Sperberg-McQueen - due 2008-12-25].

John: Closing action 209

EPR ref scheme note

Kirk: Completed filling in bib reference info
... but having trouble with CVS

Len: Agrees to check in doc on behalf of Kirk

John: How will you convert Word doc to HTML?

Len: "Save as filtered HTML" in Word

MSM: Post-editing may be required to satisfy pubrules

Len: Volunteer to perform necessary post-conversion editing on both notes to satisfy pubrules

John: Do we want to review Word version of notes before conversion and editing?

Kirk: Propose that we perform conversion without additional review, will review HTML versions

RESOLUTION: Perform conversion of notes without additional review, will review HTML versions

<scribe> ACTION: lencharest to convert notes to HTML and satisfy pubrules [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/12/18-sml-minutes.html#action04]

<trackbot> Sorry, couldn't find user - lencharest

<scribe> ACTION: Len to convert notes to HTML and satisfy pubrules [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/12/18-sml-minutes.html#action05]

<trackbot> Created ACTION-213 - Convert notes to HTML and satisfy pubrules [on Len Charest - due 2008-12-25].

Bug 5492

No resolution

Prescribed behavior of SML-IF with no schema docs included

COSMOS has interpreted the spec contrary to the intent of the WG

Conclusion: text is ambiguous

John: Shall we draft new text to clarify the issue?

RESOLUTION: Add text to the SML-IF spec to clarify WG intent around this issue

Test case revisions

Cell formulas in feature-test-map sheet of XSLX spreadsheet

Ginny suggests that the cell formulas on the feature-test-map are incorrect.

Len: I looked at it, but I'm not the Excel guru you're looking for

John: Suggest asking Pratul for assistance

<johnarwe_> sample impl reports... http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-sml/2008Dec/0032.html

Feedback on draft implementation report

John: Looking at the content of the Feature Name column in SMLFeatureImplementationReport.html, it appears that some decisions from previous WG meetings have not yet been incorporated into the spreadsheet

Len: Volunteers to grovel the minutes and make the appropriate updates to the spreadsheet

John: SMLTestCaseImplementationResults.html reveals some inconsistencies in the spreadsheet
... Need consensus on rows where expected result is missing or inconsistent
... Also need to express multiple primary features in such a way that spreadsheet<->XML round-tripping is preserved
... or drop XSLX in favor of XML version of data

Next meeting

John: WG is in recess for 2 weeks

<johnarwe_> s/2/3/\

<johnarwe_> 3 weeks to jan 8, since jan 1 is a holiday for virtually all in us

This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.133  of Date: 2008/01/18 18:48:51  
Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/

Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00)

Succeeded: s/clear/ambiguous/
Succeeded: s/not ambiguous/ambiguous/
Succeeded: s/roundtrippin/round-tripping/
WARNING: Bad s/// command: s/2/3/\
Found Scribe: Len Charest
Found ScribeNick: lencharest
Default Present: +1.425.896.aaaa, johnarwe_, len, Kirk, MSM
Present: +1.425.896.aaaa johnarwe_ len Kirk MSM
Regrets: Sandy Ginny
Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-sml/2008Dec/0031.html
Got date from IRC log name: 18 Dec 2008
Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2008/12/18-sml-minutes.html
People with action items: len lencharest msm