W3C

Mobile Web Best Practices Working Group Teleconference

25 Sep 2008

Agenda

See also: IRC log

Attendees

Present
DKA, Francois, jeffs, achuter, abel, miguel, Sangwhan_Moon
Regrets
Kai, SeanP, Bruce, David_Storey, Jo, hgerlach, rob, Sangwhan, Manrique, dom, yeliz, adam, Bryan
Chair
DKA
Scribe
francois, DKA

Contents


MobileOK Basic Tests

Francois: good news on MobileOK Basic tests. Google homepage is now MobileOK (thanks, Adam!)
... Last point before moving to PR - https certificate - the way we handle invalid certificates. Following the comments from the security context working group. Jo has proposed some text to the security context working group. Suggest we take a resolution to say this text is fine provided that sec context working group agrees.

<francois> Jo's reply to WSC WG

DKA: Don't think we need a resolution yet.

Francois: yes - we will wait for comments back from sec context wg and then wait for next revision form Jo and then take a resolution.

DKA: OK.

DKA: really good news that Google's mobileOK again!

F2F notes if any

<DKA> http://docs.google.com/Doc?docid=dd3jk8v_128gb3xp5hq&hl=en

DKA: The current draft is just a series of topics.
... I think I have an action pending to update that.
... Any comments?

francois: no real comment. Question about the phone thing?

DKA: yes. We're going to need it, because Bryan won't be there and needs to dial in.
... On the "joint meetings" part:
... WebApps WG is working on Widgets.
... It's all about packaging things and security.

<jeffs> +1 on that "Mobile widgets discussion with WebApps working group" idea, good to have explicit more-or-less seamless coord between them and us

DKA: We could work with them to establish that they reference MWABP as guidelines to write content for the Widgets.
... I don't expect we spend too much time on that.

francois: anyone talked to WebApps yet?

DKA: not yet. Give me an action

<scribe> ACTION: Dan to write to WebApps to see if we could hold a joint meeting during TPAC F2F [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/09/25-bpwg-minutes.html#action01]

<trackbot> Created ACTION-851 - Write to WebApps to see if we could hold a joint meeting during TPAC F2F [on Daniel Appelquist - due 2008-10-02].

MWABP Issues (277-280)

DKA: wonder if we should move on on that without the editors.

francois: probably not, especially since there's an editorial meeting tomorrow

Comments on widgets 1.0 Requirements

DKA: Bryan sent a note

-> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-bpwg/2008Sep/0087.html Bryan's comments on the comments

francois: yes, from what I understood, he's going in the same direction we just mentioned.
... and suggest that we forget about the comments we previously sent because WebApps is mostly concerned about packaging.
... we could use MWABP as guidelines to write the content.

DKA: Yes. I don't think we should expect too much, but that's a good idea.

DKA: We'll see that at the TPAC

francois: Should we resolve on the reply from WebApps to state we're fine with it?

PROPOSED RESOLUTION: BPWG acknowledges the reply from Web Apps WG to the comments it sent about the Widgets 1.0 Requirements specification.

PROPOSED RESOLUTION: BPWG accepts the reply from Web Apps WG to the comments it sent about the Widgets 1.0 Requirements specification.

+1

<jeffs> +1

<abel_> +1

<DKA> +1

<Sangwhan_Moon> +1

RESOLUTION: BPWG accepts the reply from Web Apps WG to the comments it sent about the Widgets 1.0 Requirements specification.

<jeffs> +1

Alan's comments on MWABP

DKA: Alan, unless you have anything to add, I suggest we skip this topic.

DKA: Let's just record that the group needs to consider Alan's comments. We're likely to address them tomorrow during the editorial meeting. Any comment to Alan's comments should be sent ASAP.

alan: one comment about ARIA which could help mobile web applications.
... A lot of work is going into ARIA.
... The TPAC would be a good opportunity to have informal talks with PFWG to see how important it could be for our document

alan's suggest text (ACTION-790)

DKA: So, that's actually what you were talking about, Alan
... I was referring previously to your other comments.
... We're going to consider these comments in the editorial meeting tomorrow.

-> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-bpwg/2008Sep/0080.html Alan's comments on MWABP

-> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-bpwg/2008Sep/0081.html Alan's comments for ACTION-790

<Sangwhan_Moon> zakim unmute me

Sangwhan introduction

Sangwhan: [introducing himself]
... from Opera Software.

DKA: Welcome to the group, we'll appreciate your helping us out. Our biggest piece of work is MWABP right now, about "great" mobile web applications.

<Sangwhan_Moon> (waves back)

DKA: Any expertise would be appreciated.
... ok, let's drop the call for today. Feel free to join the editorial meeting tomorrow.

[call adjourned]

Summary of Action Items

[NEW] ACTION: Dan to write to WebApps to see if we could hold a joint meeting during TPAC F2F [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/09/25-bpwg-minutes.html#action01]
 
[End of minutes]

Minutes formatted by David Booth's scribe.perl version 1.133 (CVS log)
$Date: 2008/09/25 15:00:18 $