See also: IRC log, previous 2008-09-02
PROPOSED to accept minutes of the last telecon 2008-08-26
RESOLUTION: Minutes from August 26 accepted.
Next meeting 30 September 2008 1500 UTC.
ACTION: SKOS Reference editors to send mail asking for feedback from users [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/09/02-swd-minutes.html#action06] [CONTINUES]
ACTION: Sean to add a request for implementations to the mail asking for feedback [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/09/02-swd-minutes.html#action07] [CONTINUES]
ACTION: Alistair to update the history page adding direct link to latest version of rdf triple [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/06/17-swd-minutes.html#action01] [CONTINUES]
Ed nothing to add to SKOS
Tom: No actions
??: RDFa is a proposed reccomendation
<edsu> !!
scribe: Yahoo search monkey (a platform to
build applic and add search experiences)
... they supported RDFa
... so possible to extract RDFa from search results
... really good RDFa support in Search monkey
Tom: comment on microformats?
Ben: issue is that new RDFa can be seen as an
opportunity
... RDFa has a consistent syntax, which is a strong point for users
... in general collab with microformats is going well
??: can you use RDfa with microformats?
<JeremyCarroll> JeremyCarroll = JeremyCarroll
Ben: RDFa gives the syntax
??: HTML 4 and 5 will mention microformats?
Ben: maybe not
... collaboration with microformats are too young
ACTION: Ralph/Diego to work on Wordnet implementation [of Recipes implementations] [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/01/22-swd-minutes.html#action20] [CONTINUES]
Tom: request from XHTML2 chairs
... Jeremy proposed a text
ACTION: Jeremy to review Curie syntax doc by Sep 05 [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/08/19-swd-minutes.html#action12] [DONE]
Jeremy: after completed the review an issue came up
<JeremyCarroll> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Sep/0030
<JeremyCarroll> Problem is CURIE and RDFa have a different reading on "xmlse"
<JeremyCarroll> Suggest add review with comment: "We trust that the comment
<JeremyCarroll> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Sep/0030
<JeremyCarroll> is addressed by the normal process"
ACTION: Jeremy to send a review to XHTML2 with comments [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/09/16-swd-minutes.html#action06]
??: disagreement on interpretation on CURIE and RDFa
scribe: in RDFa not possible to declare prefix (?)
<JeremyCarroll> Question is whether xmlse is or is not a legal prefix
<JeremyCarroll> Ben: in RDFa cannot declare this prefix
<JeremyCarroll> Jeremy: both documents should the same thing, and they should say so clearly