W3C

- DRAFT -

SOAP-JMS Working Group weekly meeting

19 Aug 2008

See also: IRC log

Attendees

Present
alewis, bhakti, derek, peaston, eric, phil
Regrets
Chair
eric
Scribe
peaston

Contents


 

 

<eric> zakim what conferences?

<Phil> IBM is Phil

<eric> Agenda for meeting: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-soap-jms/2008Aug/att-0021/00-part

<eric> scribe: peaston

Action item review

Action 19 Awaiting Roland

<trackbot> Sorry, couldn't find user - 19

Action 19 Awaiting Roland

<trackbot> Sorry, couldn't find user - 19

Regarding Action 19 Awaiting Roland

Regarding Action 22 Outstanding

<eric> item from mailing list: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-soap-jms/2008Aug/0019.html

eric: raises question about is WS-Addressing being discussed adequately, no disent from group

<scribe> ACTION: phil to present test case message examples with additions styled after peter's suggestions [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/08/19-soap-jms-minutes.html#action01]

<trackbot> Created ACTION-24 - Present test case message examples with additions styled after peter's suggestions [on Phil Adams - due 2008-08-26].

all items from last meeting 19,21,22,23 still open

phil: common request for TextMessage

<eric> Glen's email on the subject: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-soap-jms/2008Aug/0011.html

phil: should we support TextMessage as an option in addition to BytesMessage, BytesMessage addresses binary data etc

we would need to make restrictions on use cases

eric: for these reasons probably dont want to standardise

<scribe> ACTION: phil to look at wording that might allow vendor to use TextMessage and not break specifications [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/08/19-soap-jms-minutes.html#action02]

<trackbot> Created ACTION-25 - Look at wording that might allow vendor to use TextMessage and not break specifications [on Phil Adams - due 2008-08-26].

Need to consider IETF IRI scheme pending expiry when roland returns

Summary of Action Items

[NEW] ACTION: phil to look at wording that might allow vendor to use TextMessage and not break specifications [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/08/19-soap-jms-minutes.html#action02]
[NEW] ACTION: phil to present test case message examples with additions styled after peter's suggestions [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/08/19-soap-jms-minutes.html#action01]
 
[End of minutes]

Minutes formatted by David Booth's scribe.perl version 1.133 (CVS log)
$Date: 2008/08/19 16:39:36 $

Scribe.perl diagnostic output

[Delete this section before finalizing the minutes.]
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.133  of Date: 2008/01/18 18:48:51  
Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/

Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00)

Succeeded: s/hwen/when/
Found Scribe: peaston
Inferring ScribeNick: peaston
Default Present: Phil, Derek, eric, Bhakti, Peter_Easton, alewis
Present: alewis bhakti derek peaston eric phil
Got date from IRC log name: 19 Aug 2008
Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2008/08/19-soap-jms-minutes.html
People with action items: phil

WARNING: Input appears to use implicit continuation lines.
You may need the "-implicitContinuations" option.


[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]