See also: IRC log
fd: thanx for the updated doc, jo updated the text in the appendices but didn't follow the actions exactly
<francois> ACTION-815?
<trackbot> ACTION-815 -- Andrew Swainston to write some text for CT Appendix B.4 -- due 2008-07-29 -- OPEN
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/track/actions/815
rob: let's just close the actions then
<francois> Close ACTION-815
<trackbot> ACTION-815 Write some text for CT Appendix B.4 closed
<francois> ACTION-816?
<trackbot> ACTION-816 -- Sean Patterson to write some text for CT Appendix B.2 -- due 2008-07-29 -- PENDINGREVIEW
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/track/actions/816
<francois> Close ACTION-816
<trackbot> ACTION-816 Write some text for CT Appendix B.2 closed
<francois> ACTION-817?
<trackbot> ACTION-817 -- Robert Finean to write some text for CT Appendix B.5 -- due 2008-07-29 -- PENDINGREVIEW
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/track/actions/817
<francois> Close ACTION-817
<trackbot> ACTION-817 Write some text for CT Appendix B.5 closed
<francois> ACTION-818?
<trackbot> ACTION-818 -- François Daoust to write some text for CT Appendix B.3 -- due 2008-07-29 -- PENDINGREVIEW
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/track/actions/818
<francois> Close ACTION-818
<trackbot> ACTION-818 Write some text for CT Appendix B.3 closed
fd: probably could do with more examples but that can wait till after LC
<francois> HTTPS note
<francois> ACTION-819?
<trackbot> ACTION-819 -- Jo Rabin to add a note per resolution on CT 3.3.6.3 on end to end security -- due 2008-07-29 -- PENDINGREVIEW
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/track/actions/819
fd: any comments?
<francois> Close ACTION-819
<trackbot> ACTION-819 Add a note per resolution on CT 3.3.6.3 on end to end security closed
fd: then let's close the action
fd: this section was added in the
latest draft based on text by me - a minor comment is that we
use the term server and so it needs to be adjusted
... wanted to have a conformance section that follows the
guidelines - two products that can claim conformance to the
guidelines
seanP: problem with the word server?
fd: not a problem, it's just that
the conformance statement says "origin server" and the
statements all just say "server"
... so it needs amendment
... other comments?
fd: jo you acknowledged the typos sean and i submitted
<francois> Rev 1m announcement
<francois> Rev 1n announcement
fd: no other comments?
... so let's take the resolution
... on the remaining issues
<francois> PROPOSED RESOLUTION: re. ISSUE-242, allow/disallow lists fit in "heuristics of various kinds" in 4.1.5.2. Do not mention allow/disallow lists explicitly on the grounds that we do not want to prescribe how a CT-proxy works internally.
fd: ref ISSUE-242
+1
<francois> +1
<rob> +1
<SeanP> +1
RESOLUTION: re. ISSUE-242, allow/disallow lists fit in "heuristics of various kinds" in 4.1.5.2. Do not mention allow/disallow lists explicitly on the grounds that we do not want to prescribe how a CT-proxy works internally.
<francois> PROPOSED RESOLUTION: re. ISSUE-242, mention Administrative arrangements as out of scope in a non-normative appendix
+1
<SeanP> +1
<francois> +1
<rob> +1
RESOLUTION: re. ISSUE-242, mention Administrative arrangements as out of scope in a non-normative appendix
<francois> Close ISSUE-242
<francois> PROPOSED RESOLUTION: the CT TF resolves to ask the main body of the Best Practices Working to publish revision 1n of the Content Transformation Guidelines as a Last Call Working Draft
jo: I'll attend to the typos noted and produce a draft 1o later today or early tomorrow
<francois> PROPOSED RESOLUTION: the CT TF resolves to ask the main body of the Best Practices Working to publish revision 1n of the Content Transformation Guidelines amended based on typos raised by Sean and Francois as a Last Call Working Draft
PROPOSED RESOLUTION: the CT TF resolves to ask the main body of the Best Practices Working to publish revision 1o (typos corrected version of 1n) of the Content Transformation Guidelines as a Last Call Working Draft
<rob> +1
<francois> +1
<SeanP> +1
+1
RESOLUTION: the CT TF resolves to ask the main body of the Best Practices Working to publish revision 1o (typos corrected version of 1n) of the Content Transformation Guidelines as a Last Call Working Draft
[Sounds of wild cheering]
<francois> remaining opened actions
fd: [runs quickly through outstanding actions]
<francois> ACTION-811?
<trackbot> ACTION-811 -- François Daoust to send a summary of the pagination note (3.1.4) to the mailing-list -- due 2008-07-22 -- PENDINGREVIEW
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/track/actions/811
<francois> Close ACTION-811
<trackbot> ACTION-811 Send a summary of the pagination note (3.1.4) to the mailing-list closed
fd: I don't have a clear view,
suggest we wait
... there will be work to done on LC Comments
... probably the TF will have to handle
... and need CR exit criteria
... and the Landscape document to tidy up
... need a test suite
rob: don't keep the Tuesday call just because of me
fd: we will see how it goes
depending on the work of the group
... don't need a call next week
jo: I think we should request closure of TF as we have done what we were asked and the year is up, and so on
fd: I just think that we should wait to see how many comments we get
jo: OK, you are the boss (on this one!)
fd: I am not trying to keep the TF open because I like chairing of course ...
seanp: I think we should keep the tuesday time slot for now
fd: if we find we don't have much
to do then let's shut it down
... cancel next week, except if we get anything back from the
WG
... plus no call on the the 12 and 19 August
+1 to no calls
<francois> PROPOSED RESOLUTION: no call on 5/12/19 August
<francois> +1
+1
<SeanP> +1
RESOLUTION: no call on 5/12/19 August
fd: jo, you'll announce the new draft 1o, right?
jo: yes, sure
fd: [slaps TF on the back!]
-- Adjourned --